lol You're going on as if we are all imagining the 49 people killed in a gay club by a Muslim,
Ahem, I assume you have read stories by real news sources too, not just the alternative ones?
To me it seems more like it was done either by a jilted lover, or someone with really fern
ing serious issues. BTW, I haven't checked, but I'm pretty sure that these deadly-serious-foaming-at-the-mouth-jihadists actually can't be gays. You do understand that the perpetrator is believed to be a semi-regular patron of the said club?
or virtually all Muslim countries being undemocratic,
And do you know what is going to fix them? Same thing that fixed Christian countries; time and secularism. It will take time. A lot of time - we are talking about 100 to 200 years. And no, you can't make it faster.
But you can make it hell of a lot slower by antagonizing them.
You know what? I don't care for American Exceptionalism, nor for Manifest Destiny. But there is one really, insanely good thing US has done for the whole world. Their entertainment. It will slowly but surely take over the entire world. Do you understand how commonplace satellite dishes are in Iran? Do you understand that you are not supposed to own one there? Do you understand that just about every Best Korean with means watches South Korean TV - something that is probably punishable by having your testimacles cut off, and fed to you?
or all 10 countries that support death for gays being Muslim,
I think I just told you the same thing, didn't I?
or the 100s dead in France, or the dead in Belgium, or the mass rapes in Sweden and Germany, or the terror attacks in Germany—and everything else that is going on... all perpetrated by Muslims.
Mass rapes you mention of seem to be mostly figment of sick right wing imagination AFAIK, as for the terror attacks; that is very unfortunate, but what you want is not going to fix them. It is going to escalate them, instead. Maybe you have noticed that ISIS is celebrating Trump's decisions. Maybe you haven't. Maybe the alternative news haven't carried that fact. As they say in CS; Terrorists win. Trump just gave them what they wanted - leader, or "leader", of the free world, yielding to their terror.
It doesn't matter what you think (if you aren't just back to your old trolling ways, which would be so sad),
No! Your punctuation is all wrong, you have to say it like this; You are trolling, SO SAD!
There, now it sounds like something out of Trump's Twitterfeed.
the electorate have spoken. America doesn't want what the left is selling, which is mass rape and death at the hands of a brutal and intolerant religious ideology called Islam. It isn't listening to you
It's not a good time to believe what you do, because your way is on the way out. All across the West, we're going back to the Right. There is nothing you can do about it. And insulting people won't work anymore. Got anything else?
Hahah. You have no idea. No idea at all.
Keep personal attacks out of this thread. I'm impressed we've made it this far before the first one, but this is the only warning I'm giving, and it applies to everyone. Next one from anyone at all and I'm locking the thread. Y'all can disagree with each other as much as you want, but please remain civil. ~Covarr
It was just a figure of speech, if I want to insult, I'm way more capable than that.
Nah, seriously, sorry, sorry.
No-one is even arguing about the number of refugees. It's irrelevant. The number of terror attacks by those arrivals is important - and the religious ideology they share. I await his rebuttal to Shapiro (It won't happen). If even one mass murder occurs because we let in 100,000 asylum seekers, it is one too many.
One too many? So... if a native Englishman - a single one - commits a mass murder, you are going to ban them all? Well, I actually think that has happened, but you might not remember it, or maybe you are just in denial. How about the ban? You could all run into the ocean, or something, I guess.
Surely you are not applying different standards to different people? I think you claimed not to be a racist... I think
Also, he does not cite a source.
Oh, for fern
s' sake, dude. How often do you recall me making claims that I can't back up?http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/refugees-and-asylees-united-stateshttp://www.redcross.org.uk/What-we-do/Refugee-support/Refugee-facts-and-figureshttp://www.migri.fi/download/64990_Tp-hakijat_2015.pdf?6d4a98eee845d488
(can't read that? Well, that's too tough, ain't it?)
Furthermore, it isn't just "asylum seekers" - it's the immigration policy too. The UK voted for Brexit largely because it is fed up of mass immigration (largely from Muslim countries). So, Jari just conveniently cuts out the millions that have been allowed into Europe by ignoring immigration.
By all means, find the numbers. I really can't be arsed to. But I'd bet that Germany has most of them.
And looking at his list again, he deliberately dodges Germany and other countries that have taken in a net of over 1.5 million Syrian refugees. Way to go on the selective use of stats to bolster a non existent argument.
Dude. Can't you read? You are not that
much like Trump, surely?
PS. Not to mention that Germany accepts more than you could ever imagine
That's just "Holy fern
, I'm arguing with idiots, I can't be bothered to find the actual figures", if you didn't understand it the first time.
I am discussing Europe as a whole, not just the UK or Finland. So why he's even using a few countries as some sort of argument is beyond me. I think it's just to push his own narrative rather than look at the wider scope of things. Trump didn't formulate his travel ban based on the goings-on of Britain and Finland. He did so looking at the whole of the Middle East, Europe, and Israel.
HAHAH. HAHAHAHAHAHAH. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. Dude. Bannon. Dude, seriously. And he formulated it just by looking at his own, deepest, darkest desires.
Also, as stated on a video I posted, the list of terror linked countries was compiled by the Obama administration. Obama banned Iraqi refugees for 6 months. I didn't see anyone jumping around waving their hands in hysteria then. It's just a ludicrous attempt by the Left to sow discord and create havoc.
There are several sources that will explain the difference between Obama's "ban" and Trump's ban. Feel free to find them. Hint; actual, actionable threat is one of them. Other might be not
asking your advisors "How do I ban muslims, and make it look legal?"... and then having the said advisor blurt that out on live TV. I seriously think that Rudy just might really be demented - as in actually really, not just as in liberal joke. Just a word of warning; they are actualy facts, not the alternative ones.
Is this enough, or do we want more?
What do you think, am I going to read Jihad Watch or Breitbart? Take a guess. While you are doing that, I'd suggest finding an actual, at least remotely respectable sources.
It's not even all about terrorism, it's about the less brighter ones not integrating properly due to 3rd world culture, carving out ghettos due to excessively high numbers, committing "casual" crimes that get covered up and always voting for d*ckheads so the rest of us get brought down. The last reason being why they are brought in in the first place.
Right. Now that you have stated that the refugees/immigrants/whatever are less brighter, please produce proof of your own brightness. I consider that highly relevant for making such a judgment. I'll post a scan of my Mensa membership-card right after that, if you want.
And we don't want them to either. More need banning. The whole system needs to be improved. It won't stop all terrorism, but at least it will be massively reduced in the long run and you won't end up looking like Europe - the laughing stock of the Milky Way.
Would you like to ban Norwegians while you are at it? They have a beautiful country, and they are annoyingly well off, there's a reason enough. Ah, they also have this dude called Breivik, killed 77 people, most of them kids. Surely enough reason to ban them. Or... not? He's one of your kind, after all.
Or all Americans, perhaps? Maybe just Timothy McVeigh? Or are you too young to remember? 168 killed, over 680 injured. He wasn't one of your kind, but a terrorist he was.