Hey, no prob sl1982. To tell the truth, even though the pic shows nudity, it's some kind of artistic photograph that I didn't feel was against the rules. I'm even surprised imageshack took it out. I mean, in my country (France), tits are no big deal, and even though the girl was naked, you couldn't see between her legs. Plus, she had some very small breasts which were hardly vulgar / sexually-oriented in any way. And she looks very pure. I don't see how anyone could have found this picture offensive, but heh, to each his/her own. And if it's to "protect children", this is just stupid. As I said, not only didn't this pic show anything significant, but there's nothing sexual in it. Children know better than most guys what boobies look like... ...But I know prude America has different views on this.
Anyway I hope the woman on your desktop finds herself in the near future a ham sandwich
Normally I'd agree with you. I'm also disturbed by women who are too skinny, and can't count the number of times when I thought that a certain woman should eat more hamburgers. But the girl you saw on my desktop is just beautiful. This skinny-ness suits her perfectly, and she's not skinny enough to show what's under her skin (ie. bones, blood vessels & muscles - yuck ) . And her face...
Anyway, promised, I won't do it again. So you guys won't be able to see my drawings either
(because yes, I am a perv and proud to be
)