Mummy, what's wrong with that man? 
He's just expressing himself, no need to be worried, dear.
Actually, I think it's fairly awesome that he does that. He obviously doesn't have issues with his body - or anything else for that matter; the video is a reply to an epic flamewar - of Seiferific proportions, and actually tone as well, and he went and posted photos of him and his wife, his address and phone number as well. I think he might have been making fun of the asshat's accusations about how easy it is to attack - or in this case 'attack' - people anonymously.
You can read the whole thing
here. There's 1000+ posts of it, though.
Actually, while reading that, I became ever so slightly suspicious that our Seifer and Stuart Campbell are one and the same person.
As for that NSFW girl, I would hit it, based on what I can see.
As would I. Again and again. And again. Like the fist of an angry God.
I suspect, however, that she's at least 35. Firstly, she was brought up in a conversation about how people can incorrectly guess someone's age, secondly, there's a chance that some shooping was going on and thirdly, the photo emphasises her legs and hides her hands. Legs tend to stay young looking for longer than most other body parts, whilst hands are notorious for giving away a woman's age. Her torso looks like she might not be as young as she first appears, although it might be that she is muscular or her ribs are visible, which complicates matters. Oh, and I've just noticed that since she's standing in that position, we can't tell whether her breasts are saggy or not.
Yeah, it would be interesting to see what people would guess without the premise that kinda gives it away.
So very true; hands are usually a dead giveaway.
And no, not saggy. That's however most likely due to the fact that they have been touched by a surgeon. OTOH, supposedly that's the only part of her that has been artificially improved.
As for shooping; almost certainly, it's a photoshoot for a magazine - all of them are very much of 'the spoon is a lie'-stuff; you won't find an unretouched one anywhere, no matter how old or young the person is. I think movie premieres are the best indication of this, normally you see the actresses and actors either in a movie - where their make-up has been done by a horde of professionals, or in magazines, where they are also shooped to look good. The candids from the red carpet quite often show that the reality can be quite different. Then again, a bad photograph can make anyone look bad, so it works both ways. In this particular case it probably does help hide her age, but I'd say that the situation is quite fair in the sense that
everyone gets shopped in these things.
Anyway, enough babbling... meet
Amparo Grisales (both links NSFW!). She's 50. Yes, fifty years old. Born in '56, the photos are from a '07 magazine.
How does that make you feel, kids?
