Messages

101

General Discussion / Re: Final Fantasy 7 for PS4 Announced

« on: 2014-12-10 13:56:06 »

If there is one thing we cant do really well yet it is field and world scripting. We have the means like MR but we dont have new dungeons or quests yet. Sure there are some edits like the Aeris patch or the script changes I had to make for single player combat and also more demanding stuff in the overhauls for the PC version but there is still very little new content. More changing what we have.

I made a small quest for psx where a new enemy appears in the isle of the round cave, those chosen theme plays, a new reward is given when defeating him and the wanderer in call gives you something for the loot.

It was quite simple to do but just changing the scripts and dialogues and designing a new enemy already took extremely much time regarding how small this “quest“ was.


What I wanna say is that if there was something sensible they could do with a rerelease that would be extra content like the stuff from Dawn of Souls. New dungeons on the worldmap, new enemies with new models in them, new superbosses, some new weapons etc..Stuff like this takes long for us to do but would be a cake for Square...We could fight Sapphire weapon in some underwater cave or so.

102

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-12-10 11:28:18 »

About 0.4% of the world's population is supposed to be infected with HIV. I don't think this prevented the world from being overrun.

103

General Discussion / Re: Final Fantasy XV (new TGS trailer)

« on: 2014-12-09 23:29:00 »

I see Spiro, don't disappoint us then  Oh and I had no idea that nomura also did directing before, I thought people are just mixing up the drawer and the guy who writes the character development. Thx for clearing that up.

104

General Discussion / Re: Final Fantasy XV (new TGS trailer)

« on: 2014-12-09 19:10:39 »

Actually Nomura's job as character designer is based on the graphics not on the storyline.

105

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-12-09 10:09:17 »

That's my version, too and for the same reasons. On the witnesses, the part where people claim seeing a quiet, small plane is pretty hard to argue with for someone trying to defend the presence of passenger flights on 9/11. How likely is it that only a single person mistakes a roaring coloss like a boeing which is flying unusually close to him at high speed for something that is smaller than it is? The opposite would make sense but not this.

@Covarr I do not want to offend anyone but I generally stopped giving too much on this. No matter what people argue about suddenly all arguments are invalid because someone saw everything with his own eyes and more exact than any official report. Especially on 9/11, how many people were at the wtc during the impact? A few thousands? I must have met every single one of them.

Again not calling anyone a liar but it is no prove to me either if someone appears and saw everything, that always happens.

106

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-12-08 14:51:14 »

People like you are the reason nothing gets done about anything. You're too busy making up imaginary problems in a fake reality so you can apply nonsolutions to them instead of actually helping people in the real world. The terrorists won that day, and you're not helping.

I do not see anyway why believing that it was the government with help of planes means you are helping people while denying the planes makes you a bad person. We are just having different opinions that is all. And I seriously do not know what Shard's position is as he explains in his first post that the steel tower could not collapse according to the official version and said multiple times that he expects the government to be involved.


There are only 3 footages that were broadcast live on nbc, fox and cnn. All of those have terrible mistakes in them like the nose coming out on fox. Thus I dont believe in planes, that simple. All amateur footage was published much later than the official stuff.

107

General Discussion / Re: Final Fantasy XV (new TGS trailer)

« on: 2014-12-08 13:55:06 »

Wow, this really looks amazing. I hope they get proper fps, this looks very demanding

108

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-12-08 12:51:49 »

@Shard

You misunderstood me, I was even referring to what eyewitnesses said. I only say that not all of them report seeing a boeing that hit the towers. Just because there were thousands of people does not automatically mean that they all support what you say but you always refer to them as though they did. I wanted to write “You just think it's clear they all saw the boeing as there were so many people present but...“

As I have written many people who were around were not identifying an airliner but spoke about seeing a small plane or jet or even a missile.  Many people also reported seeing no plane at all.

http://www.septemberclues.info/faq_4.shtml
 (of course this tiny bit proves nothing but you never gave proof for the eyewitnesses who support your points at all)


You say that the presence of the passenger flights is proven by the presence of thousands of witnesses. You say no boeing being there would cause trouble because of witnesses. However, there is no official proof that thousands of statements are reporting this. There were many people but you can not know what they all saw and heared but still refer to them as though you do. The presence of an object that is considerably smaller than a passenger flight is absolutely possible and maybe even no plane at all. At least there was surely no airliner flying around.

And as I said before I wonder what your version is. What do you believe is what happened? You know the towers had to be brought down with powerful explosives but still think terrorists did it with airplanes at the same time? It makes no sense at all.

109

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-12-08 03:47:19 »

@Shard

I really wonder what you are thinking!?
Spending a page explaining that the government lies about 9/11 which I spend little time talking about on this topic as you and others did the job explaining that the detonation was surely not just heated fuels, we even discussed the motives, and still you post dramatic nonsense like “terrorists won that day“ -.-

Realizing the government is miles away from telling you what happened how can you still be so blind to be believing them? Military reasons, political reasons, financial reasons THAT is 9/11, nothing more. Oil, NSA, TSA, Patriot Act, all of this crap. Even the most weird conspiracy theory no matter how stupid has more proof and sense than the ridiculous hoax the govs were spreading. And you still believe terrorists are to blame, do you still not get the reasons for 9/11? And how much the administration, in a perverted way, actually benefitted from the events?

And one more thing on the planes: The problems you mention do not exist at all. The newscast footages that were brought live is what I kept mentioning in every single post I made and kept telling you to investigate and comment on which of course you never did hoping to lie about them once I'm out. All you did was pathetically defending the Hazarkhani video which is surely the worst video editing in history.

I think I directed you to nbc chopper 4 about 300 times without any success and still you believe you know what an argument is.

The only interesting footage of those “30 proves“(which is a compilation video of how NOT to fake records) is the newscast footages as faking 30 or 400 low res strawberries videos is a work of an hour. And those live videos unlike you say do not show planes. Fox chopper has the alleged “plane's“ nose flying out of the building, nbc chopper shows an object that can hardly be recognized and if it is not edited, is still considerably smaller than an airliner and the disparities in contrast, lighting and sharpness between the plane layer and the actual video on the cnn Hazarkhani footage or the naudet video of the first impact is most laughable.

Also saying that the trajectory path of the “planes“ on all those videos of wtc2 impact from different angles were properly synchronized is a pure lie that shows a lack of research. Sticking only to nbc for instance, one must ask why the evening news report that was also spread in other countries(I was never able to see the actual live footage in my country on 9/11 ) is so bad compared to the live footage. It is contained in the 43 angles video posted on the previous page and shows the buildings from the exact same angle and position as the live cast. Except the whole background is removed to make it seem different, instead of the hudson river etc. there is blue nonsense and some terribly rendered black jet approaching the towers on a different path than the small moving object that can be seen during the live broadcast.

Why would you do this? Chosing a bad quality shot that strangely has no surrounding whatsoever and a n incoherent plane path instead of the good quality live shot which is also contained in the 43 angles video on the last page  and which can easily be found searching nbc chopper 4?

I tell you why, as this live video was not clear. The lie about airplanes had to be spread rapidly so rather take bad rendering than a serious footage that requires discussion. Even today people like you make it so easy as you can not tell the difference between an actual filmed plane and a terribly bad job of editing.

On fox news chopper you get a very wide view  of ny before the impact on the wtc2 where the plane MUST be visible. But it ain't there, it appears out of nowhere, melts into the steel tower without physics and its nose flies out of the other side.

The thousands of eyewitnesses you mention are the next lie. You just think it is clear they all saw,the boeing as there must have been so many people present but if you do your research you find out it is wrong. There is no official statement whatsoever as no witness ever had to make a proper report on a lawcourt. You have no idea what people were actually seeing and hearing.

What I have found out is that only a minority of witnesses that were asked by reporters actually identified an airliner. Most people said that they saw a small plane or maybe a missile or a jet. People who were seeing AND hearing a plane during the impact and identifying  a passenger flight when it hit are almost not existent. Mentioning some witnesses who do so with proper proof may be a good idea before having “thousands of witnesses“ on one's side that surely nobody questions. Are they like the harley guy I linked who called the place “ground zero“ few minutes after the impact??

San Francisco airport had no single relative of the alleged passengers arrive when the 9/11 hoax was published on the news. I even read that passenger lists documented by the airlines have incoherent numbers and certain names appear multiple times on different planes. I do not have evidence at hand but the fact that nobody was waiting at airports for their family can easily be researched. United airlines even gave an official statement:

“We informed the families of the passengers that their relative must have died on the plane.“
Sure, calling hundreds of people whose number they can not have “Please do not arrive on our airport as your relative didn't make it“.

Very credible....there were no people as there were no airliners and fake passenger lists.


And what about wtc6 and wtc7? They were eradicated, how? If it was terrorists with stolen airliners what destroyed those buildings? There is not even debris in wtc6 but the whole interior is completely gone. Who has the ability to plan a controlled destruction of all wtc buildings and have any research or comission lead nowhere? Terrorists packing the whole towers with explosives/thermite for months?

No. Only the government could do that. And they did.


Edited an unclear formulation.

110

Completely Unrelated / Re: Final Fantasy VII Most Wanted Remake in Japan. Sony Lists Favorite PlayStation g

« on: 2014-12-06 23:16:06 »

Heh, no relax my friend. If there was a bad wording it was mine of course. I was intentionally exagerating a bit, thus the smilie I wrote it as chaoscontrol just complained about the blurry textures so I was like, “don mind about it and try the emulator“ because that one is pretty good. You know on modding it is just that chosing which version to play is much more arguable than on ff7. I only meant that ff8 does not yet have those must-have mods that would never work on psx so when people complain about the steam release one may surely recommend epsxe especially with requiem.

111

Completely Unrelated / Re: Final Fantasy VII Most Wanted Remake in Japan. Sony Lists Favorite PlayStation g

« on: 2014-12-06 20:08:18 »

This is not disrespectful at all, people are also modding the psx version and the best patch so far is requiem which does not exist on pc. It is just the case that ff8 pc does not yet have the advantages over the psx version as ff7 does.

Why does the pc version have to be superior and saying it wasn't would be disrespectful? I did not say modding is in vain but both versions get modded and the psx version has advantages. The only thing that is really better than psx as for now is roses and wine but those textures are another example for things epsxe does better.

Even now I am still playing and thus spending much time with modding the psx version of ff7 and I do have my reasons.

112

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-12-06 15:16:18 »

Actually I said I'd leave it as it is but there is little more to say:

@Leonhart: Sorry if I talked to easily about this. Some video fakery is just so bad that I must laugh but I do not think the incident is actually any funny. Sorry, i'll try with some more respect.

@Goth: I can understand if you find my posts stupid but do not think I made no research. I was studying many videos and articles from the other side, people like you who try to debunk any kind of weird conspiracy  theory and the moment somebody shows me a photograph or a video where one can clearly identify a boeing passenger flight I'm gonna buy their story. Without a doubt.

Unfortunately this is not possible. I know every single video about the impact, none of the ones included in your 43angles compilation was new to me and none proves the presence of a boeing plane. Just some terrible resolution private videos and the only ones with a little quality show some entirely black monstrum without any kind of similarity to a boeing. If you look at the footage where the plane flies by the crane and you stop right before it hits you get a quite good and large image of the plane. Never ever is this a passenger flight. Not even form and shape match it, plus it is completely black without any windows, logos etc. Like all those videos are. It is either edited or at least no usual airliner.

The only footage in this video that looks authentic is the one I posted myself earlier and that is the nbc newscast from chopper 4. This one also does not show a plane anywhere. That small thing approaching the towers is much too small and also does not have any shape like a plane. On your compilation you can blame the resolution but this video exists in much better quality on the net. Search it, view it and you see everything but no plane. This thing is at best about 30-40 feet in size.

113

Completely Unrelated / Re: Final Fantasy VII Most Wanted Remake in Japan. Sony Lists Favorite PlayStation g

« on: 2014-12-06 14:57:47 »

Why not just play it over epsxe 1.9 with perfect sound and full hd resolution?

114

Completely Unrelated / Re: Final Fantasy VII Most Wanted Remake in Japan. Sony Lists Favorite PlayStation g

« on: 2014-12-06 12:40:55 »

I must say that I find rereleases much more appropriate for Square games than remakes. I like nostalgic games but with colorless NES graphics and 8 bit music even I do have my limits so I just like the games to be polished a little but nothing else. FF3 3d remake was already to much in my eyes but the FF1 dos remake for ios is really excellent. Nicer graphics, remastered music, easy controls but exactly the same game it used to be. That's good work.

115

Completely Unrelated / Re: Final Fantasy VII Most Wanted Remake in Japan. Sony Lists Favorite PlayStation g

« on: 2014-12-02 19:56:44 »

Because the game did not change at all and the graphics is better in pcsx2.

That's Japan, they want the games to look like advent children, ffx is way too static. They actually like Lightning...

116

Gameplay / Re: FFVII Modded item question (Lost Wing Overhaul)

« on: 2014-11-28 00:35:01 »

Hehe, those are just traces left during the modding. When lostwing edited the Kernel he may have just renamed some slots he does not use for whatever reason. Of course you are not supposed to have an item called “Kush mota f$!@“ Haha why would you add something like that ^^

Using cheats you can of course get anything that actually is not in the game or the mod.

117

Completely Unrelated / Re: Where is the Black materia?

« on: 2014-11-25 15:50:41 »

Sure but by now the compilation has more components than just AC. I also don't take all those plots too seriously but isn't it strange that those writers never left a word about the materia?

Oh and I must say that Sephiroth potentially coming back  and Jenova poisoning the lifestream was something about AC that I found quite plausible due to the circle of nature and the way lifestream is described in the original game.

118

Completely Unrelated / Where is the Black materia?

« on: 2014-11-25 13:32:02 »

What happened to it after the events of the original game? We saw the white one drop into the water but what happened to the black one? There is no trace of either one in advent children or anything else I've seen, why were the remnants not after it? Where did it go anyway?

To me it looked like Sephiroth had it so when he was reincarnated in AC with all his stuff his sword etc., why not with the black materia? It even looked like he kinda merged with it, would he not cast another meteor as soon as he was back?

Or are holy/meteor spells that can only be used once?

119

Troubleshooting / Re: Extending the integral value (approx. 65535) to 99999+

« on: 2014-11-25 02:29:54 »

Yeah that is true of course. I admit I should've put more emphasis on the “rewrite the whole battle system“ part. I wasn't trying to imply that it could be done by editing 3 offsets or so, just including that it is technically possible. And that it is I'm sure.

120

Troubleshooting / Re: Extending the integral value (approx. 65535) to 99999+

« on: 2014-11-24 23:36:08 »

As this is qhimm, I guess you are talking ff7?

First of all, the displayed damage is 16 bit but holding negatives so we can go up to 2^15 -1 which is 32767.

Now extending this is technically possible, there are multiple variables of different size holding the damage during the calculation. With a strong missing score shot the game must be able to handle several hundred thousands of damage which it is, on psx the threshold for base damage goes as far as 2^18, on PC, though I'm no expert for the port, should be even more.

Now the tough one is altering the code. One has to change the memory assignment for the specific battle routines to make it use larger variables for the whole calculation. That should be damn. hard and afaik require a pretty complete rewrite of the battle system.

For starters take memory dumps to get to the files needed to execute the damage calculation. If you rock you will find the correct code, disassemble it, rewrite it, make the rest work with it, repack and release.

I don't see that happening though

121

Graphical / Re: Swapping cloud's field model (also his animation)

« on: 2014-11-21 10:50:56 »

That's a superb idea. It should be no problem to have Tifa's animations for the worldmap only. Grab Tifa's model in kimera and replace her body parts with Aeris' equivalents.

122

Graphical / Re: Swapping cloud's field model (also his animation)

« on: 2014-11-20 11:22:10 »

You can always test anything. Use Blackchocobo to edit your save file to your liking. You can drop your character in any field such as calm or chocobo farm or you can raise your stats to defeat the zolom. It is also possible to just run over the swamp without fighting the zolom. Saving and reloading helps with this as the zolom's position is not stored in the save file

123

Gameplay / Re: FF7 PSX Mass ISO update (SOLVED)

« on: 2014-11-20 04:34:31 »

Please don't necromance threads for no reason. There is a Mass ISO update tool made by lasyan3 which is reported to work pretty well.

124

Graphical / Re: Swapping cloud's field model (also his animation)

« on: 2014-11-20 04:26:02 »

The worldmap is split in parts but the model that is loaded is always the same one. There is none for Aeris but you can simply replace the model of Cloud and standard animations. Of course some worldmap animations like chocobo will not work properly but who cares. If you do you can also just copy Aeris body parts over Cloud's skeleton in kimera.

On PSX we have a WORLD folder, is there no such thing on PC? The model should be easy to find.

125

Gameplay / Re: change limit break for another one?

« on: 2014-11-19 17:51:39 »

Oh yeah sorry for that. Sometimes I just refer to the psx formats as Im used to work with them. Forget what I wrote about the battle models, on PC they do not contain animations. You must look into the files containing animations.