Messages

126

Gameplay / Re: change limit break for another one?

« on: 2014-11-18 23:02:57 »

Enemies use to have multiple attack animations. They have custom attacks instead of the regular commands that players use and more than one attack may be a physical blow. What you have to do is get the name of the attack whose animation you want for the attack command, then you open SCENE.BIN in proudclod and look up which animation this is using. Locate the scene containing the correct enemy, click the tab for animations/formations and note the animation ID that is used.

Now you must only find the first attack animation inside the lzs file and then you must only count. Note that animation ID 00 will not have to be animation 0 from the .lzs model as this contains all the standard animations like standing, receiving damage etc...I do not know what order they have but as the dying animationis also referred to here the ID may be correct after all.

Ultimately you must know which of Vincent's animationsthat you replaced was the one for attacking. Once you got all the information you can swap it for the animation of the desired enemy attack.

127

Graphical / Re: Swapping cloud's field model (also his animation)

« on: 2014-11-18 15:29:40 »

Minigames are still a mystery. On the PSX the bike Cloud is inside MINI/H_Kawai.BIN but I do not know if such a file exists for PC. The snowboard model hasn't been located on either platform it seems to be loaded from space or something.

128

Q-Gears / Re: Q-Gears Field Module - Midgar Conversion Project

« on: 2014-11-18 01:10:20 »

Tom and Akari. I am extremely impressed with your knowledge and abilities. I really need to sit down and understand this project. I really am in the dark on what Q-Gears is.

I also find this extremely impressive! As far as I understand it qgears is a selfmade executable that will run ff7 from the extracted files found on the psx ISO. That eliminates the need to play some pc port or using an emulator. Just extracting all the files, scripts, models and fields and qgears runs it like a pro

At least that is the target and the progress seems very good so far. Keep it up guys

129

Gameplay / Re: change limit break for another one?

« on: 2014-11-18 00:45:43 »

Yeah you can do it in libre by changing the animation ID to an empty one like the one you will find on Vincent's limits. Also you can change the effects of the limit there so it actually does something. It could also change status or add the hero drink property.

It depends on the limit, though. Some are Kernel controlled, others are controlled in libre. The mnu has priority but it does not cover all attacks and effects. For instance Cloud's Finishing Touch is defined in libre to kill all targets but has a special property letting it deal damage if the enemy is immune to that. Now where is this damage defined?

In the kernel you will find a copy of Finishing Touch that deals damage and is called by the special property of the original one. So altering FT basically is done in libre but when the condition is kept the FT that is done on enemies immune to death is inside the Kernel.

All I wanna say is that you may have to use wallmarket as well.

130

Gameplay / Re: change limit break for another one?

« on: 2014-11-17 22:06:27 »

You could just alter the limit in libre to change stats or something.

131

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-16 19:40:40 »

Possible that it is a resolution glitch. Still I find the plane to look very constructed and unreal actually

Well, whatever you believe I think it is always good to question your version and research again. I'm currently doing the same. I'm still sure that the cnn vid is fake but that may have multiple reasons.

Anyway I'm outta here. Whatever course this will have I just have more fun getting back to modding than making up weird conspiracy lol

The thing is I just can not deny what my eyes tell me and I always found all those planes to look rendered, hence I can't buy the governmental version and go searching for evidence. Have fun guys ^^

132

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-16 14:59:24 »

@Shard
They made a mistake because they had to rush. Now I'll give you the point that you said that I am basing a lot on a single clip that's true

But that's just because you said it wasn't fake. I thought it was a clear fake and then I planned to go on with other videos(you still haven't commented the nbc chopper, why even argue if you can't explain that?) but you really take that shaded low res 3d model for reality so it gets longer than I wanted it to.

Why the mistake happens is actually not important but at 0:23 the wtc  building is in front of the right wing of the plane so it must be a 3D plane. Doesn't happen with a real one.

Now on your question, what if I spoke the truth and the plane was 3D rendered and faked? Well this means that any other video of that impact is likely be faked as well. Imagine there was a real boeing flying into the tower. Then all videos that have the explosion should cover that, right? So if a video has the explosion/smoke etc. perfectly synchronized with all other videos it MUST also show the real plane right?

Unless you say the whole thing is animated but that is really hard to do. At least in a few hours. So it is more likely that the original of a video that shows no plane during the impact instead of a fake one probably didn't have any plane at all. Or something smaller like a missile that is hidden behind it.

The reason I came up with that last idea is just because all videos that look very fake are very well synchronized. And that is very hard to do in a few hours. No one has the time to create some 3D simulation that covers all plane perspectives from any point precisely. So I assumed that there must be some guideline which also minimalizes the effort of drawing the plane.

Again on the nbc live footage. I linked it in my first post, probably you better do the research yourself. It is the nbc chopper 4, searching this will give you numerous results. None of those show a plane, though. How? Why? The only thing that can hardly be recognized is a very small object flying towards the tower. Some say it is faked and didn't appear in the live shot. Others say it is a small missile or so but it is sure no boeing.

So that fits quite nicely does it not?

133

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-16 10:35:54 »

Yeah it's getting to the point where people are just ignoring facts and ignoring evidence. This isn't going to go anywhere useful.

True, I was bringing evidence to you and you ignored it. You ignored that the nbc chopper 4 I linked in my first post here shows no plane. You ignored that the cnn video I linked multiple times is full of rendering errors. You think just because you made up an absurd explanation how the wing could get behind the red building you have facts?

I examined the video further and found many more glitches with the wing inside the smoke. The most obvious one is at 0:23. The  right wing is behind the fassade of the tower! You may have to play/stop 0:22-0:23 two or three times to see it and you will eventually see how the white boarder of the wtc is completely in front of the airplane's wing. Have fun ignoring that and closing the thread.

http://youtu.be/LSDfbm8OhCg

134

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-16 02:14:54 »

Sure xD

135

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-15 20:26:45 »

@Kaldarasha

Yeah, that's very well possible. There are many possibilities but the cnn footage is definately a lie just like the clarke or the fox chopper broadcast where the nose comes out lol.

What do you think about the police car I mean it isn't important but another hint that all media broadcasts were in the hand of the conspiracy. Maybe someone having fun?? I mean how does a backward playing police car come into a news cast?

I mean this isn't like a technical mistake someone really made quite an effort to cut that car in just the car layer playing backwards :O It's not someone riding backwards like hell fast there is a car cut in which is playing backwards, the sirenes spin the wrong direction.

Why would anyone do this? Probably having fun while no planes had to be smacked into broadcasts?

http://youtu.be/0Yl0K6kC4B4

136

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-15 18:35:48 »

@Shard

Are you trolling me? Well first of all, you can believe what you like and it is not a problem to me. For me the cnn is a clear 3d model I can tell what an animated plane looks like and I assume most people would agree.

Anyways, of course I was talking about the slow motion again why suddenly the first video ?
You didn't find the absolutely incorrect relation between the size of the plane and its position in the room with the wing disappearing funny so I just give you the next position in the video where the cgi rendering has a mistake.

Here is the video again:

http://youtu.be/LSDfbm8OhCg

At 0:26 the top of the left wing is behind some background building, examine 0:25-0:28. It is the same mistake happening with the red building. Comparing the size of the red  building and the plane you should already be able to tell that the plane must be far in the foreground. If you say that the plane must be behind the building that is just one more clue for poor rendering. The plane would have to be much smaller.

Anyways, at 0:26 the building that the wing disappears behind is clearly in the background. Also I suggest you do some research, there's a lot more wrong with the cnn broadcast. Also the angle and view should be impossible, I saw someone reconstructing in on google earth and there wasn't even a clear sight. The cnn is a cgi joke.

137

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-15 16:09:57 »

@Shard

Did you even watch the slomo at 0:26-0:27 where the wing disappears again behind a wtc structure that is far in the background? The red building is the first thing that works but as arguing is near impossible with someone without a 3 dimensional imagination lets just skip the red building and talk about 0:26-0:27.

138

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-15 11:40:11 »

@Shard
You are not serious are you? Try a slow motion:

http://youtu.be/LSDfbm8OhCg

If you seriously believe that this is a true video you probably believe anything that's on tv. Everything about this is wrong and ridiculous. Do you seriously believe the plane's wing can suddenly be behind that building while  the body is clearly in front? If the plane approached the tower from the angle you say it could never hit the tower the way it did.

Also stop at 0:26. If you really believe the wing can go behind the red building how did it go behind the tower structure at 0:27?? I hope you see it now ..

Also what is this black striped plane supposed to be? A boeing does not look like that. And then the impact...Try physics, if an obiect hits something there is a force going back against that body like when you hit the wall with your fist.

But there is no impact at all. The plane remains in perfect condition being half stuck in the buttertower which also does not take any damage at all. It does not even get slower. It is the most ridiculous video on the net and even most people who deny the theory that there were no planes at all still agree that this is a fake plane.

You really don't get very far calling this a true video.

139

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-15 01:41:06 »

The reasons for 9/11 were simple.

1. Gold
2. War

There were probably over 100 billion dollars in form of treasures underneath the towers. Only about 200 million was found, see here: http://youtu.be/F5eHk9xYEJg

Also thanks to wikileaks there is tons of pager data recorded that mentions the airplanes hitting the towers before 9/11. It was all prepared.

Another reason why they did it was to justify whatever they wanna do. War on Iraq, NSA spying the whole world...

140

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-15 01:09:51 »

Wow actually by now people have quite some progress with this topic and can stop calling everything a pure speculation.

1st of all, the second airplane hit never happened, at least no boeing hit wtc2, that is a fact. For the first one there is no proof but for the second one there definately is, lets start with the cnn broadcast of the second hit:


http://youtu.be/kct2DgQQN5w

Gimme a break isn't this laughable? Well I won't bother discussing how silly the plane just melts in the tower and disappears but look at the left wing at around 8 seconds. It it behind the building in the background so the plane is edited into the video.

Scary, is it not? CNN doing a broadcast of edited material? Why would they do this? The rest of the video is very well synchronised with other views on the scene just a plane was put into it. But why? There are 2 possibilities: There was no plane at all or there was something else hitting the tower.

Looking at the broadcast of nbc we can definately say that option 2 is the case, look for yourself.

http://youtu.be/5wF74zTLjNg

This is the footage that nbc cast live when the second hit happened. At around 1:50 you can see an object flying towards the tower. Whatever that is is the reason why the cnn footage was edited to me it looks like a missile or some small jet or something but definately it is no boeing.

Most people never saw this because later at the day when nbc broadcast a replay of this footage it is edited and looks totally different and at least as ridiculous as the cnn video. The whole background with the hudson river is just blue and totally missing and an airplane suddenly comes from the side although the live footage I just showed you has no airplane in it at all. There is this small missile thing coming from the south and suddenly it explodes but no planes.
 
Now that you are aware of this, how much are you believing the first airplane? Actually in a talk show I learned that only about 20% of the people who were interviewed that day right when it happened said that they saw an airplane, they only saw it later on tv.

And amongst the witnesses who were broadcast are cool guys like this:


http://m.youtube.com/?gl=DE&hl=de#/watch?v=aldyfSFjOFc

That is an actor. Even if the similarity to the crisis actor ffom LAX does not convince you, just hear what he says. “Then the building collapsed, mostly due to structional failure as the fire was too intense“, cmon who talks like that? If you listen to the whole interview of this harley guy you will hear him say “ground zero“.

He calls it ground zero just like a few minutes after the impact? Lier

Anyway I have more and that will give you nightmares



http://m.youtube.com/?gl=DE&hl=de#/watch?v=0Yl0K6kC4B4

There is a backwards driving police car in this live broadcast. Someone was doing a huge effort for this pointless video edit, the guys who faked all the footage obviously allowed themselves some fun. The background of the video is playing in real time while the layer with the police car is playing backwards. Lol

141

Completely Unrelated / Re: The truth and other lies...

« on: 2014-11-14 16:28:22 »

It's crazy that there are seriously still people who believe that planes hit the towers. If that happened, why was there a need to fake media broadcasts with 3D model planes added to them?

There's a handful of media broadcasts that look SO ridiculous they are obvious fakes. There is no impact at all, the planes don't take any damage or even get slower. They just melt into the tower like it was made of sugar. It looks so pathetic I can't believe people buy this.

A plane made of lightweight Aluminium cutting through tons of steel, yeah right.

142

General Discussion / Re: “Welcome to Square Enix”

« on: 2014-11-13 15:06:39 »

And I hope you sneak over to the archives and get some ISO documentation of the old ff games for us 

143

FF7 Tools / Re: [FF7PC/PSX] Field Editor - Makou Reactor (1.6.2)

« on: 2014-11-11 18:55:03 »

What do you mean by ghost texts? When I delete the command to display a certain dialogue it is gone from the texts section after saving and reloading.

144

FF7 Tools / Re: [FF7PC/PSX] Field Editor - Makou Reactor (1.6.2)

« on: 2014-11-10 23:38:15 »

Strange, did you try inserting the new field file using cdprog? As long as your file is only slightly larger than the original one it will still fit into the sector.

Mostly that is the safest way to go. Extract your whole FIELD directory using cdmage, then mod the directory using MR and finally insert the modded files in cdprog, that's 100%.

Another issue when using a different method like Hack7 or MassIsoupdate is increasing the ISO size. As I know that you are creating mods you should know that it is pretty tricky to have the image size increased as you can't make small ppfs anymore.

For MR this may be a small bug in the save ISO function.

145

FF7 Tools / Re: [FF7PC/PSX] Field Editor - Makou Reactor (1.6.2)

« on: 2014-11-10 23:14:34 »

MR auto deletes unused text, so if you create new dialogue but never call upon it in a field script the dialogue will just be erased.

146

Completely Unrelated / Re: Ehrgeiz Ffvii brawler for ps1? Heard of it?

« on: 2014-11-09 16:04:07 »

Sure, it's crap.

147

Troubleshooting / Re: Final Battle against Sefirot (bug inside)

« on: 2014-11-07 05:05:37 »

Ah it is the formation type controlling that model, I see. I was already suspecting this when I said “it's scripted“ as you said Cloud is not in the battle. He may be in the party but the formation does not place him but HRCloud instead which is why nobody is mentioned in the Limit Break message.

Oh yeah, Sephiroth is scripted to die even if Cloud misses or deals 0 damage which can only be achieved by modding/hacking/cheating.

Anyway I also wonder how he gets a new camera. I always wondered that as the camera is defined on the attack. Is there 2 omnislashs?

148

Scripting and Reverse Engineering / Re: Shortened Summon Animations

« on: 2014-11-06 23:38:22 »

This is surely not gonna happen. The animation scripts we can modify do not go deeper than just calling an animation like Tera Flare. If you want to cut that you must hex edit the actual animation data and I'm sure nobody here, neither on PC nor on PSX knows those well. At least not well enough to perform such a precise adjustment.

149

Troubleshooting / Re: Final Battle against Sefirot (bug inside)

« on: 2014-11-06 23:34:57 »

I think you don't get what NFITC1 was talking about. It says “Cloud Limit break“ if cloud.lzs is being loaded just because the party slot is filled by him. We don't have cloud.lzs loaded, though. Now if you change the target model that does not change the scripts of course it is not about the 3D model, it is for whatever reason why cloud.lzs is not loaded as usual.

Now you said the party is Cloud-empty-empty. Still I believe that the Cloud we control is a newly created character like some random enemy standing on our side. Did you find field commands erasing all of cloud's materia before the fight, adding omnislash, disabling item command, adding counter 100%??

I'm sure we are not controlling Cloud, this whole battle is scripted probably in the respective scene file. That way the game easily controls limit bar and atb with ease, this is just theater.

150

Gameplay / Re: Does anyone have the wallmarket values for Holy Materia?

« on: 2014-11-06 23:28:08 »

In my mods I usually use Diamond Beam animation for holy. That really is most fitting and looks really good, the animation index is FE.