Qhimm.com Forums

Off-topic forums => Completely Unrelated => Topic started by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-23 17:58:50

Title: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-23 17:58:50
Actually planes are more unsafe than cars.  I know you have been led to believe otherwise but aviation uses hours and distance you travel and not the journey number.  By journey number this is the death toll:

Deaths per billion journeys
Bus: 4.3
Rail: 20
Van: 20
Car: 40
Foot: 40
Water: 90
Air: 117
Bicycle: 170
Motorcycle: 1640

You are 3X more likely to die on plane.


<< reply to guy on other page.

I think it's quite hypocritical of you to complain about people manipulating statistics when you are doing exactly the same thing yourself, most likely because you like to be contrarian just for the sake of it.

One of the things that sets plane journeys apart from car journeys is that the former are nearly always much longer. Now I know what you're thinking: "BAWWW, plane accidents usually happen at take-off or landing!". That doesn't matter, because car crashes don't usually happen when the car is being started or parked. There's an increased risk of minor accidents at this time, but it isn't when most of the accidents happen. Therefore, the chance of death in a plane doesn't increase much as the journey becomes longer, but the chances of death in a car increases dramatically, to the point where car journeys that last more than a certain amount of time become much more dangerous than plane journeys. These longer journeys, which have a higher risk, are the only ones that are comparable to flights, since these are the only times when one might be unsure as to whether it's better to go by car than plane.

I suggest you think about why these statistics are useful. Your amazing revelation that you're less likely to die in a car trip to the shops than on a long-haul flight to Jakarta does not help someone who is, for example, thinking of the best way to get from New York to Los Angeles. Sure, the average flight has a greater chance of death than the average car ride, but the car ride you'd be taking is not an average one. The flight you'd be taking is an average one, and has an average chance of resulting in death. For any journey that it is appropriate to take by plane, you're many times more likely to die in a car ride than you are on a flight, and that is why planes are regarded as safer.

And while we're at it...

Where did you get those statistics from, Seifie-kun? You are aware that not all countries have equally safe roads or equally safe airspace. If these are British statistics, I suggest you bear in mind that British roads are exceptionally safe by global standards. That death rate per journey might be very different in one of those countries where road laws are seen more as friendly suggestions than actual laws. That is to say, anywhere below 50° latitude north. Most of the world's population lives in these dangerous places, where the sun and heat turn road rage into road madness, and every journey is a game of Russian roulette.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-23 22:51:57
I think it's quite hypocritical of you to complain about people manipulating statistics when you are doing exactly the same thing yourself, most likely because you like to be contrarian just for the sake of it.

I don't think deaths by journey number is as unfair as death by miles travelled or hours travelled, and nor do the insurers.  No stat is perfect I made that clear but planes are not as safe as car in terms of deaths.  That's a statistical fact.  You sound quite irritated, perhaps you like to believe you are all hunky dory when on a plane ;)  I also didn't manipulate the stats as I didn't compile them, professionals did.

Stats are here:

http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/square/ca14/ALYCIDON%20RAIL/INFORMED%20SOURCES%20ARCHIVE/INF%20SRCS%202000/Informed%20Sources%2010%202000.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_safety#cite_note-38

It doesn't matter how you slice it, planes are not "the safest", at best they are "as safe" (and even that's in major dispute).  That's all.

Quote
Finally there is my preferred parameter, or rather the one I find most meaningful as I climb on a train. Fatalities per 100million or billion journeys, or its inverse, one fatality per so many journeys

This is, I think, (and readers may disagree) how risk is perceived at the moment of travel. Am I likely to survive this train journey, flight, drive and so on?

Railtrack certainly disagrees and argues that the passenger thinks in terms of making the same journey, that is travelling the same distance, in different ways. Hmm, but statistics show, for example, that a majority or car accidents happen within three miles of home, for example.

So, I still prefer journeys as the parameter. And on this basis, the DETR figures show buses and coaches at 4.3 per billion journeys, rail at 20, car at 40, air at 117 and motor bikes and mopeds at 1,640.

But I think (though readers may disagree), that the risk of death expressed one in so many journeys is more easily grasped.

Now, statistics such as those in the Table are riddled with inconsistencies. For example, as shown above, the rail figures cover falls at stations and passenger trespass. Coach and air don't include people standing too close to the runway, wing walking on 747s or falling down the escalator in the bus station.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-23 23:28:27
I don't think deaths by journey number is as unfair as death by miles travelled or hours travelled, and nor do the insurers.  No stat is perfect I made that clear but planes are not as safe as car in terms of deaths.  That's a statistical fact.  You sound quite irritated, perhaps you like to believe you are all hunky dory when on a plane ;)  I also didn't manipulate the stats as I didn't compile them, professionals did.

How hilarious. I sound irritated? Perhaps that's because I can see you being a hypocrite and manipulating statistics in a very brazen fashion. I wonder whether you have a fear of flying that you're trying to justify? FYI, I hardly ever fly, so don't try to use that against me.

And how on Earth can you thing that deaths by journey is less unfair when the journeys are so incomparable? Unless, you're extremely rich, you only use planes for extremely long journeys; it's not fair to compare them to shorter journeys made by car. It's only fair to compare like with like. By your logic, we might say that husbands are more dangerous than lions. After all, people who have ever had a husband are more likely to be killed by their husbands than people who have met lions are to be killed by said lions. But then, encounters with lions tend to be much more fleeting, so they are not always comparable.

Oh, and that little factoid you bolded about car accidents usually happening near the home? That's because most car journeys are only to places very near the home. Trips to the shop and school runs are much more common than cross-country treks. If I were a betting man, I'd wager that the longer a journey goes on, the more chance there is of a fatal accident, particularly when driver fatigue comes into play, as it does with longer drives. If there are 100million 1km journeys and 1million 500km journeys (we're getting into plane range here), and 10000 deaths in 1km journeys and 1000 in 500km journeys, does that mean that 500km journeys are safer? Certainly, there are fewer death in such journeys. But there are ten times as many deaths per journey.

And as I suspected, it was a British source. You know that for most countries, those car death figures would be much higher, right? Perhaps even higher than the per journey figure for planes.

Anyway, you seem to be hilariously missing the point of the article. Or at least, of tat section of the article. It was about how using one set of figures rather than the others can allow someone with mendacious intent to make one form of transport seem safer or more dangerous. And that's just what you've done! You've picked the data set that suited your prejudice (the least appropriate data set, seeing as planes are only used for longer journeys) and have used it mendaciously.

And finally (phew, I'm making a lot of paragraphs like this!). Those statistics are only for one year. Given the nature of plane deaths, being rare events that happen in clusters, data from just one year is very unreliable.

Of course, I don't plan on convincing you. We all know that when Seifer makes up his mind about something, he never changes it. That part of Seifer will never change. I just plan on exposing your fallacious reasoning lest others be seduced by it.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-24 02:37:27
I don't quite understand how I can be manipulating stats that I did not compile LOL
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-24 17:01:11
I don't quite understand

No. I don't think you ever will.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Armorvil on 2011-03-24 21:44:45
I don't quite understand

No. I don't think you ever will.

What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good. I think this would be a good time to stop going in that direction, KM. But it's only my opinion.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-24 21:57:13

What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good.

That depends on how one defines "good".
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-24 22:25:54

What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good.

That depends on how one defines "good".

Well lets see your definition of good. Because if you keep antagonizing him I am sure that you are not going to find it good by any definition of yours.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-24 23:07:22

What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good.

That depends on how one defines "good".

Well lets see your definition of good. Because if you keep antagonizing him I am sure that you are not going to find it good by any definition of yours.

Quick question:

When did pointing out the flaws in someone's argument become "antagonizing" him?

I hope that question won't be regarded as antagonism.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-24 23:13:11
The question is fine, the implication that he is not intelligent enough to understand what you are saying is not.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-24 23:17:10
The question is fine, the implication that he is not intelligent enough to understand what you are saying is not.

He have me no choice! Look at the post I quoted, and ask yourself how anyone could resist that obvious comeback. He just left himself  w i d e  open to that one.

Anyway, that was a single post. There's no need to act like it was a continuous stream of provocation, which is what seems to be going on here.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-24 23:22:01
Oh come on, do you think I am stupid? You almost always argue the opposite side of a point just to stir things up. Especially when he is involved. There is a word for that you know... trolling? I seem to remember you discussing it before.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-24 23:33:03
Oh come on, do you think I am stupid? You almost always argue the opposite side of a point just to stir things up. Especially when he is involved. There is a word for that you know... trolling? I seem to remember you discussing it before.

Actually, I gave the opposite side because what he was saying was extremely misleading. Wrong, if you will.

I only troll people if they deserve it. If I had agreed with what he was saying, I would have had no reason to troll him.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-24 23:39:41
No one deserves trolling. Attack his arguments if you feel the need to. Leave the attacking of the person out of it.

I think I have said enough on the matter.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jari on 2011-03-25 05:16:53
The question is fine, the implication that he is not intelligent enough to understand what you are saying is not.

Truth can be a painful thing. :D

Case in point; you are now doing exactly what Seifie-kun demanded of me - acting as his personal damage control team. He makes a booboo - not that rare of an incidence, considering that he is stupid, and prone of making it lot worse, because he is an asshat.

Like I said... truth. It can hurt.

But do carry on, I find this most amusing. :D


Oh come on, do you think I am stupid? You almost always argue the opposite side of a point just to stir things up. Especially when he is involved. There is a word for that you know... trolling? I seem to remember you discussing it before.

So, it's now called trolling to disagree with an idiot who has issues?

Or are you suggesting that Kudi-chan is not right? If not - and I hope you aren't, because he obviously is - are you suggesting that disagreeing with Seifie-kun is trolling? Or perhaps you are suggesting that speaking the truth about Seifie-kun's behaviour is trolling?

Because it certainly looks like you are doing one of those things.


No one deserves trolling. Attack his arguments if you feel the need to. Leave the attacking of the person out of it.

How about you do the same?


PS. And I thought that no more LULZ could come from this thread, after the stupidest interpretation of statistics... well, ever. I was wrong, oh so wrong. This is great. ;D
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-25 05:39:27
Figures you would show up Jari.

The question is fine, the implication that he is not intelligent enough to understand what you are saying is not.

Truth can be a painful thing. :D

Case in point; you are now doing exactly what Seifie-kun demanded of me - acting as his personal damage control team. He makes a booboo - not that rare of an incidence, considering that he is stupid, and prone of making it lot worse, because he is an asshat.

I am not 'Seifie-kun's' damage control team. I have a problem with anyone who wishes to attack another person on here. Argue with whatever point you wish but start attacking people directly and i have a problem.

Like I said... truth. It can hurt.

But do carry on, I find this most amusing. :D

I am glad you are enjoying yourself. Wouldn't want to bore you.

Oh come on, do you think I am stupid? You almost always argue the opposite side of a point just to stir things up. Especially when he is involved. There is a word for that you know... trolling? I seem to remember you discussing it before.

So, it's now called trolling to disagree with an idiot who has issues?

Or are you suggesting that Kudi-chan is not right? If not - and I hope you aren't, because he obviously is - are you suggesting that disagreeing with Seifie-kun is trolling? Or perhaps you are suggesting that speaking the truth about Seifie-kun's behaviour is trolling?

Because it certainly looks like you are doing one of those things.

I shouldn't need to explain trolling to you Jari. You know exactly what it is.


No one deserves trolling. Attack his arguments if you feel the need to. Leave the attacking of the person out of it.

How about you do the same?

I have attacked no one. I have warned, but feel free to spin things whichever way you like.

PS. And I thought that no more LULZ could come from this thread, after the stupidest interpretation of statistics... well, ever. I was wrong, oh so wrong. This is great. ;D
[/quote]
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Cupcake on 2011-03-25 05:48:17
Goddamnit Jari, can't you just fucking drop it already?

Same goes for you Kudi, you're becoming more and more of an insufferable asshole by the day.

I mean really, we're not a large community, is it so goddamn hard to not hate each other?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-25 06:08:19
Goddamnit Jari, can't you just f*cking drop it already?

Same goes for you Kudi, you're becoming more and more of an insufferable ahole by the day.

I mean really, we're not a large community, is it so goddamn hard to not hate each other?

 :x

Everyone best drop this now.

Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jari on 2011-03-25 06:18:06
Figures you would show up Jari.

Hey, you can call me your conscience if you want. :-P


I am not 'Seifie-kun's' damage control team. I have a problem with anyone who wishes to attack another person on here. Argue with whatever point you wish but start attacking people directly and i have a problem.

If you say so. :) I admit, that is lot more realistic scenario than existence of a higher power - God if you will - and lots of people believe that, too. :)


I shouldn't need to explain trolling to you Jari. You know exactly what it is.

Hmmmm. Apparently it's one of the alternatives I pointed out then, since I don't see you disapproving them. :P


I have attacked no one. I have warned, but feel free to spin things whichever way you like.

O RLY? You sure you ain't picking on Kudi-chan, because he stepped on someone's toes? Someone who... let me guess, in one way or another was the first to come crying for mommy? I doubt he'd use the word "demand" again, that would have been bit too rich even for him, though. :)

Answer me this; do you seriously think that implying driving to be safer than flying based on that particular statistic is not stupid?

And if it is stupid, is it wrong to point out the person doing so is, in fact, stupid?

BTW, I do wonder why the statistics seem to have disappeared from Seifie-kun's post. :D This is totally unprecedented behavior! I have never seen anything like this from him! Must be the little grey aliens abducting text from his posts! :P


Goddamnit Jari, can't you just f*cking drop it already?

Same goes for you Kudi, you're becoming more and more of an insufferable ahole by the day.

I mean really, we're not a large community, is it so goddamn hard to not hate each other?

 :x

Everyone best drop this now.

Afraid of something, are we? :D

Anyway, I have things to do and places to be. Ta-ta for now. :)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Cupcake on 2011-03-25 06:25:27
Goddamnit Jari, can't you just f*cking drop it already?

Same goes for you Kudi, you're becoming more and more of an insufferable ahole by the day.

I mean really, we're not a large community, is it so goddamn hard to not hate each other?

 :x

Everyone best drop this now.

Afraid of something, are we? :D

Anyway, I have things to do and places to be. Ta-ta for now. :)

Or he's trying to keep order in the forum that no longer needs, or wants you.  Sorry you're not terribly important to us, must have you questioning your self worth, considering you keep coming back.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-25 08:01:48
We could always ignore that which we find to be inaccurate or offensive, perhaps focus on producing something?   "Interesting statistics, but I disagree, here is some alternative data." - Instead of "Statistics manipulation haha!" Of course attempting to use strange forms of subjective logic to encourage other strange forms of subjective logic makes for...whatever this^ is called.  It'd be fun to jump in, but you can always win these things by frusterating the other guy with deliberate stupidity - respond to something stupid, and there is now evidence you care about stupid things.  Too bad I can't say that without also applying it to this post.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Armorvil on 2011-03-25 09:33:11

What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good.

That depends on how one defines "good".

If "good" to you means a flame-war and a troll-fest, yes, I can understand why you'd head into provocation territory. It's so fun, right ?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 10:19:25
Or he's trying to keep order in the forum that no longer needs, or wants you.  Sorry you're not terribly important to us, must have you questioning your self worth, considering you keep coming back.

I find this amusing, given the fact that you yourself said that you'd leave the forums a few weeks ago and said that you aren't important.

Then changed your mind five minutes later.

Goddamnit Jari, can't you just f*cking drop it already?

Same goes for you Kudi, you're becoming more and more of an insufferable ahole by the day.

I mean really, we're not a large community, is it so goddamn hard to not hate each other?

I'm amused by how much the third line of that post contradicts the first two. ;D

But I'm pleased that I now know where I stand. I wonder whether this hatred for me is because I didn't take the side of light and justice and defending fair maidens during that debacle you had with Jari a few weeks ago? Or maybe it's because I say bad things about Apple?

I apologize for him Kudi he has been off his med's for days.

Terrible things can happen when one is off one's meds. I once even got my husband's friend mixed up with my fiancé. That caused a lot of embarrassment during the wedding!

you are now doing exactly what Seifie-kun demanded of me - acting as his personal damage control team. He makes a booboo - not that rare of an incidence, considering that he is stupid, and prone of making it lot worse, because he is an asshat.

Indeed, but no just Seifer's personal damage control team. It seems like the best way to get the mods on your side 'round these parts is to be a troll. Perhaps sl would be more sympathetic to me if I spammed porn and threatened to kill people?

The current anti-flame war tactic seems to be forbidding anyone to robustly criticise the arguments of someone known to have a short temper. Just in case something bad happens. Like this. Of course, that means that we have to let certain people do whatever they want, just so that we can avoid trouble. That sounds like appeasement to me, and the last time i checked, appeasement had a less that perfect record in dealing with bad people.

Now, watch how quickly I get moderated for pointing out unpleasant facts!
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-25 12:02:42
LOL  You can't be taken seriously really.  It is clear to everyone you are a troll who is a bit butt hurt that your best pal left (and only returns when there is trouble ) ;)  I will leave you to it.  You turned a simple argument about aviation safety into a character assassination and baiting exercise.  Ask Jari where that gets you these days.  I am not that idiot who was here before, I don't take it that seriously anymore and I can ignore it or laugh at it.  Not to mention the mods here now actually do something.  You are a dyin' breed round these parts, and thank god for that.  If you want to act like a moron and fit in with your f*cked-up kind, I suggest you boogie on over to the Lifestream Forum.  You will find a lovely home there, for sure.  They will also agree with every crazy argument going, so you won't even need to argue.  IQ entrance fee <60.

Seriously, you  need to learn to get your fun elsewhere.  This is a bit basic.  You have both got to such a point that you don't even care how obvious your trolling is...  it has become second nature to you.  While we are at it, trolling is a mental disorder and is strongly linked to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

In other words it makes you awful, bitter people; delighting in the trouble you cause.   All you serve to teach us in this thread is that you are not nice people and are both mentally disturbed.  Usually stems from childhood and upbringing.


What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good.

That depends on how one defines "good".

If "good" to you means a flame-war and a troll-fest, yes, I can understand why you'd head into provocation territory. It's so fun, right ?

best thing is to leave him here talking to himself about how bad I am.    It is no good being an obvious troll, and it is obvious to everyone here that he takes opposite sides to stir up a bit of trouble ;)  With that in mind, what use is it even arguing with him?  Let's move on because he is getting exactly what he set out to achieve. 

A familiar pattern around here is the ones who don't contribute anything to FF7 are the same ones who go round trolling.  Always stuck in this section bringing up as many things as possible to get a reaction.  It is sad...  but not surprising that Kud is a regular over at 4chan.  :mrgreen:

He goes on about Hermoor 24/7 but is no better than him.  I suggest Kud and jari go and join him, they are more alike than they believe.

back to the topic:

The whole point of the statistical slant was to show that people who quote "Planes are the safest" are basing it on dodgy stats; parroting the propaganda and brainwashing that is peddled by the media and aviation, and that a fairer stat is the deaths by JOURNEY NUMBER.  I don't think anyone here feels safer knowing that they are more likely to die in a plane by journey number and instead think "oh well, by miles travelled I am...so...I will just think of happy thoughts.  It's gonna be a goooooood day.".  That would be crazy.  The reason the aviation use that stat is because it looks good (honestly, that's obvious).  The reason the insurers use the death by journey number is because it is a more faithful statistic.  Yes I said more faithful, not perfect.

Planes usually crash and burn on take off or landing.. so what happens in-between is largely irrelevant.

I did not mean to claim that the stats show conclusively that planes are more dangerous than car, but that at best, planes are no more safe.  If I said that or gave that impression then I retract it.  They certainly are NOT the safest form of transport.  That is a fact.  An undeniable fact.  I am well aware that even the death by journey stats are not perfect and have problems in interpretation but they are far fairer than death by hours travelled or distance travelled. 

I would also like to add that given the choice of death, most of us would like the sharp fast death of car. If something goes wrong in a plane, generally you will be alive for a long time, in utter panic the likes of which you cannot conceive.  You are placing your life in the hands of a human operator, and hence most accidents in plane are human error related.  I am afraid that human error does exist on plane.. it doesn't just stop because the Aviation's dodgy stats say so.

I did not manipulate any statistics, as I did not compile the stats, I merely stated them.  The fact is, kud is just trolling and I would wager in direct conversation with his buddy, the lunatic Jari.   


If either had any real care for debate they would have attempted it, instead they made everyone aware that they have no argument other than "MANIPULATION!!!!!" and at the same time made their trolling look ridiculously blatant.  It is no surprise to find that the same people are the source of every argument on this forum and always will be.  You would have thought that their enormous practice at it would have made them more competent trolls, but as I said, they do it so much they have become complacent.  This thread has become the biggest joke ever, and it is all on Kud and jari!

Cheers boys :P

1 last thing.  You 2 need to give up trying to bait me and troll me.  We are never going back to the old days so move on.  :o  That way you will at least maintain some sort of dignity instead of being the laughing stock of the forum.  I will not be back to this thread.




Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: obesebear on 2011-03-25 14:55:55
The attempts to make other people look stupid are pathetic now.  Was it a little amusing when it was happening a year or so ago? Sure.   But when it becomes a noticeable pattern (dare I say obsession), it just becomes sad.

Jari, I used to enjoy your humor; your posts used to be a real nice read because you seemed to have a really fun-loving personality.  But now that you've had a falling out with Qhimm, it's time to be upset and blame Mako and DLPB.  Oh no! Mako may have been a past troll who has cleaned up her act!! Whatever shall we do?  DLPB posts his opinion as 100% fact, yet has ceased outright attacking people... Good God it's chaos!  Now please, go ahead and quote my post and make some more complaints while pretending to somehow be superior to me.

Kudistos.. Really dude?  We're not dumb.  It's blindingly obvious you still dislike DLPB.  Granted for the most part you've put the past behind you and tried to be civil, it seems any chance you get to call him out on something you do it.  Not just debating something he's decided is pure fact, but mocking and belittling him as well.  If you want to debate posts and show how your side is the only side worth caring about, fine, good, do it.  Personally, I love playing devil's advocate, but when you start slandering people, you start losing the respect of everyone witnessing it.

DLPB, just because we're "on your side" right now, gives you no right to question anyone's IQ.  You're becoming guilty of the same character defamation you're accusing KM of, which most of us now know as baiting.

I too HIGHLY suggest everyone ceases the name calling.  Debating is all well and good, and I love it, but let's keep it at that.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 17:51:44

Kudistos.. Really dude?  We're not dumb.  It's blindingly obvious you still dislike DLPB.  Granted for the most part you've put the past behind you and tried to be civil, it seems any chance you get to call him out on something you do it.  Not just debating something he's decided is pure fact, but mocking and belittling him as well.  If you want to debate posts and show how your side is the only side worth caring about, fine, good, do it.  Personally, I love playing devil's advocate, but when you start slandering people, you start losing the respect of everyone witnessing it.

Akshully, before this thread, I'd had no more problems with Seifer than the average forum member. In fact, there were some cases in which I was on his side. Why don't you have a look at the old ATTN: Seifer Almasy thread and see how often my name pops up and how much baiting/gloating I do? Could it be that you are confusing me with Jari? Or perhaps you are confusing Seifer with Hermoor? I ask this because I really can't see why you are coming to the conclusion that my act of pointing out the weaknesses in Seifer's argument is motivated by some grudge. If anyone has the grudge here, I think it might be certain moderators who don't like certain members who have, in the past, questioned their decisions.

I know that facts haven't been regarded as very important in this debate, but there is still time to change that, instead of making wild and unfounded accusations.

DLPB posts his opinion as 100% fact, yet has ceased outright attacking people

I suggest you read the post right before yours. Do you not think that

You are a dyin' breed round these parts, and thank god for that.  If you want to act like a moron and fit in with your f*cked-up kind, I suggest you boogie on over to the Lifestream Forum.  You will find a lovely home there, for sure.  They will also agree with every crazy argument going, so you won't even need to argue.  IQ entrance fee <60.

is an outright attack?


DLPB, just because we're "on your side" right now

That's so obvious you don't even need to say it.

1000 words of seething hatred, just because I disagreed with him

So it's true. A leopard really can never change its spots.

It's funny that a have the moderators and a significant proportion of the forums gang up on me for a one line jibe, but all this gets is "you're as bad as he is".
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: gotenksssj22002 on 2011-03-25 18:25:44
LOL  You can't be taken seriously really.  It is clear to everyone you are a troll who is a bit butt hurt that your best pal left (and only returns when there is trouble ) ;)  I will leave you to it.  You turned a simple argument about aviation safety into a character assassination and baiting exercise.  Ask Jari where that gets you these days.  I am not that idiot who was here before, I don't take it that seriously anymore and I can ignore it or laugh at it.  Not to mention the mods here now actually do something.  You are a dyin' breed round these parts, and thank god for that.  If you want to act like a moron and fit in with your f*cked-up kind, I suggest you boogie on over to the Lifestream Forum.  You will find a lovely home there, for sure.  They will also agree with every crazy argument going, so you won't even need to argue.  IQ entrance fee <60.

Seriously, you  need to learn to get your fun elsewhere.  This is a bit basic.  You have both got to such a point that you don't even care how obvious your trolling is...  it has become second nature to you.  While we are at it, trolling is a mental disorder and is strongly linked to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

In other words it makes you awful, bitter people; delighting in the trouble you cause.   All you serve to teach us in this thread is that you are not nice people and are both mentally disturbed.  Usually stems from childhood and upbringing.


What is there to gain by provocating him ?... ...Answer : nothing good.

That depends on how one defines "good".

If "good" to you means a flame-war and a troll-fest, yes, I can understand why you'd head into provocation territory. It's so fun, right ?

best thing is to leave him here talking to himself about how bad I am.    It is no good being an obvious troll, and it is obvious to everyone here that he takes opposite sides to stir up a bit of trouble ;)  With that in mind, what use is it even arguing with him?  Let's move on because he is getting exactly what he set out to achieve. 

A familiar pattern around here is the ones who don't contribute anything to FF7 are the same ones who go round trolling.  Always stuck in this section bringing up as many things as possible to get a reaction.  It is sad...  but not surprising that Kud is a regular over at 4chan.  :mrgreen:

He goes on about Hermoor 24/7 but is no better than him.  I suggest Kud and jari go and join him, they are more alike than they believe.

back to the topic:

The whole point of the statistical slant was to show that people who quote "Planes are the safest" are basing it on dodgy stats; parroting the propaganda and brainwashing that is peddled by the media and aviation, and that a fairer stat is the deaths by JOURNEY NUMBER.  I don't think anyone here feels safer knowing that they are more likely to die in a plane by journey number and instead think "oh well, by miles travelled I am...so...I will just think of happy thoughts.  It's gonna be a goooooood day.".  That would be crazy.  The reason the aviation use that stat is because it looks good (honestly, that's obvious).  The reason the insurers use the death by journey number is because it is a more faithful statistic.  Yes I said more faithful, not perfect.

Planes usually crash and burn on take off or landing.. so what happens in-between is largely irrelevant.

I did not mean to claim that the stats show conclusively that planes are more dangerous than car, but that at best, planes are no more safe.  If I said that or gave that impression then I retract it.  They certainly are NOT the safest form of transport.  That is a fact.  An undeniable fact.  I am well aware that even the death by journey stats are not perfect and have problems in interpretation but they are far fairer than death by hours travelled or distance travelled. 

I would also like to add that given the choice of death, most of us would like the sharp fast death of car. If something goes wrong in a plane, generally you will be alive for a long time, in utter panic the likes of which you cannot conceive.  You are placing your life in the hands of a human operator, and hence most accidents in plane are human error related.  I am afraid that human error does exist on plane.. it doesn't just stop because the Aviation's dodgy stats say so.

I did not manipulate any statistics, as I did not compile the stats, I merely stated them.  The fact is, kud is just trolling and I would wager in direct conversation with his buddy, the lunatic Jari.   


If either had any real care for debate they would have attempted it, instead they made everyone aware that they have no argument other than "MANIPULATION!!!!!" and at the same time made their trolling look ridiculously blatant.  It is no surprise to find that the same people are the source of every argument on this forum and always will be.  You would have thought that their enormous practice at it would have made them more competent trolls, but as I said, they do it so much they have become complacent.  This thread has become the biggest joke ever, and it is all on Kud and jari!

Cheers boys :P

1 last thing.  You 2 need to give up trying to bait me and troll me.  We are never going back to the old days so move on.  :o  That way you will at least maintain some sort of dignity instead of being the laughing stock of the forum.  I will not be back to this thread.

really give up trying to bait you??????????? you do know you just took their so called bait right proving them to be right in every way shape and form km i'm on you side
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 18:30:08
really give up trying to bait you??????????? you do know you just took their so called bait right proving them to be right in every way shape and form km i'm on you side

Why thank you! ;D

But I must point out that there was no baiting. I merely thought he was wrong and called him out.

People have decided that I was baiting, with no evidence, and often relying on claims about my past with Seifer that are completely untrue, and have interpreted this whole affair according to the grand narrative of kudi-chan being a mean old poopy-head.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: gotenksssj22002 on 2011-03-25 18:36:09
really give up trying to bait you??????????? you do know you just took their so called bait right proving them to be right in every way shape and form km i'm on you side

Why thank you! ;D

But I must point out that there was no baiting. I merely thought he was wrong and called him out.

People have decided that I was baiting, with no evidence, and often relying on claims about my past with Seifer that are completely untrue, and have interpreted this whole affair according to the grand narrative of kudi-chan being a mean old poopy-head.

yes i know you wasn't baiting just i was using his own words
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Mako on 2011-03-25 18:41:47
Quote
Terrible things can happen when one is off one's meds. I once even got my husband's friend mixed up with my fiancé. That caused a lot of embarrassment during the wedding!

I think you are trying your best at humor? Came off a bit mean...I was trying to lighten up the situation no need to attack me :(

Now before you say the much anticipated "I didn't do anything" pay attention to the bold. You like to sneak stuff like that in...I don't like it, I am sad that you decided to make fun of me when I was trying to help. I was defending you on IRC, and I often enjoyed your jokes and posts.  :-[
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 18:45:33
Quote
Terrible things can happen when one is off one's meds. I once even got my husband's friend mixed up with my fiancé. That caused a lot of embarrassment during the wedding!

I think you are trying your best at humor? Came off a bit mean...I was trying to lighten up the situation no need to attack me :(

Now before you say the much anticipated "I didn't do anything" pay attention to the bold. You like to sneak stuff like that in...I don't like it, I am sad that you decided to make fun of me when I was trying to help. I was defending you on IRC, and I often enjoyed your jokes and posts.  :-[

I don't see how saying that I was "off my meds" was "trying to lighten up the situation". In my opinion, that was a bit mean. Implying that someone is mentally ill does not help the situation.

But we all know that, on these forums, certain people can be insulted with impunity but others can't be criticised at all.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: obesebear on 2011-03-25 18:47:36
But we all know that, on these forums, certain people can be insulted with impunity but others can't be criticised at all.
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lffp50bv7O1qg7bz2o1_400.jpg) (http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lffp50bv7O1qg7bz2o1_400.jpg)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 18:49:07
But we all know that, on these forums, certain people can be insulted with impunity but others can't be criticised at all.
(http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lffp50bv7O1qg7bz2o1_400.jpg) (http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lffp50bv7O1qg7bz2o1_400.jpg)

So, you're not even trying to deny it, but instead are gloating about it!

So many people's true colours are being revealed!
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: obesebear on 2011-03-25 18:57:24
My true colors indeed.  I'm best friends with DLPB.  Best friends since way, way back.  We're going to take over these forums he and I, just biding our time for now.   In all honesty, I'm best friends with whoever I side with in any debate... it's just the sad truth of things.  How could I possibly be neutral on a Final Fantasy forum... emotions just run too high.

I probably shouldn't have posted that picture, but what's done is done.  However, I think you do realize your bias and just want an argument.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Mako on 2011-03-25 19:05:15
Quote
I don't see how saying that I was "off my meds" was "trying to lighten up the situation". In my opinion, that was a bit mean. Implying that someone is mentally ill does not help the situation.

You missed the whole earlier part of the joke (deliberately?) see you have a very interesting post style. Many people found my joke funny and it could have ended the situation had you not kept pressing the issue.

You are extremely funny when you want to be, this is very uncharacteristic of you to keep attacking everyone who has posted in your thread. Has something happed? are you feeling ok? don't let DLBP get to you he can be a bit... ummm passionate but there is no reason to insult everyone.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 19:13:59
My true colors indeed.  I'm best friends with DLPB.  Best friends since way, way back.  We're going to take over these forums he and I, just biding our time for now.   In all honesty, I'm best friends with whoever I side with in any debate... it's just the sad truth of things.  How could I possibly be neutral on a Final Fantasy forum... emotions just run too high.

And the worst thing about that is that your sarcasm is so close to the truth. There's clear favouritism; you've even admitted to it.

What else is clear is that I am being used as a proxy by which to attack Jari. All of Seifer's arguments lump me and Jari together*, and your claims that I have some grudge against Seifer show that you have confused my history with Seifer with Jari's history with Seifer, and have made assumptions about my motivations based on that confusion.

However, I think you do realize your bias and just want an argument.

You keep saying that. You have no evidence, but you keep saying it. Is it so hard to believe that I thought Seifer's argument was just bad?

*What's especially funny about Seifer's conspiracy theory that I am secretly working with Jari just to be mean with him is that I could just as easily make the same claim about Seifer, and I'd have more evidence! I could say that Seifer is working with Hermoor to be mean to me. Those two have been known to work together in the past in order to cause trouble, and Seifer is generally known to play the PM game to get people on his side. I have never done that. He had no evidence that I was doing that; he just asserted it. Just as you have asserted that I am trolling, without having any evidence.

I'd really like to see some evidence for these claims that all I'm doing is trolling, because at the moment, there is none. There are just assertions. Assertions that are made with no evidence and assertions that are based upon outright falsehoods.

What's also interesting is that no-one has made much of an argument for anything I've said being false. People just seem content to say that I'm trolling and ignore the truth completely. That's a classic Bulverism. Don't bother to say what's wrong with someone's argument (that's too hard!), just assume that the person is wrong and come up with reasons as to why the person came to be so silly.


You missed the whole earlier part of the joke (deliberately?) see you have a very interesting post style. Many people found my joke funny and it could have ended the situation had you not kept pressing the issue.

Then you should take more care to make your jokes clearer and to make sure that they're appropriate for the situation. If no harm was intended, then I am of course willing to let it go.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: yarLson on 2011-03-25 19:18:38
the funny thing is, this is called the Trolling Thread, so I hope no one is trying to deny whats going on here. Secondly a debate requires some contents of logical consistency so lets not try and say that's what this is. I am not taking any sides here honestly there are some relevant points on both sides, as well as some logically fallacious statements. I would say however that the original post was a bit of a drastic assumption. Manipulation requires some aspect of truth to be altered to an untruthful state, while still under the guise of being truth. I don't think he is guilty of any such thing and so the premiss of your whole argument is irrelevant and this thread is pointless. This does not mean I am taking his side, it simply is what it is, call it what you want. I have a tendency to place the blame on the first to antagonize, I'll freely admit that. I feel a little stupid for even replying at this point but the only reason I am posting this is to hopefully encourage somebody to read this.

http://www.logicalfallacies.info/

being logically fallacious does not make you stupid, it simply makes you human, so lets please drop the personal attacking from either side. Similarly, to point out an argument as wrong is one thing, but to be able teach another why they are wrong is quite another. The later is the soul of an argument. If you have no intent of teaching someone what you believe to be true, and if you are not willing to leave open the possibility that you are wrong, then you have no legitimate basis to call a simple quarrel an argument.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Mako on 2011-03-25 19:27:38
Quote
Then you should take more care to make your jokes clearer
I thought it was pretty clear... I even separated it (didn't indent though) and the joke was immediately well received. To which I might add that normally my jokes fall flat.

I will make this clear; I am defending my joke it is very rare that I get a laugh and many at that! I will fight to the death on this issue. Now instead of us lancing each other verbally we can drop it and have hugs! and be forum pals. Do not attack my joke sir I need this one!
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-25 19:30:30

You are a dyin' breed round these parts, and thank god for that.  If you want to act like a moron and fit in with your f*cked-up kind, I suggest you boogie on over to the Lifestream Forum.  You will find a lovely home there, for sure.  They will also agree with every crazy argument going, so you won't even need to argue.  IQ entrance fee <60.

is an outright attack?


Yes it is, and it will not be tolerated from you DLPB anymore then anyone else. If you kids cannot play nice in the playground then you do not get to play.

I leave this as my final warning: Any more personal attacks and said person will be moderated and I will filter their posts before they are posted. This goes for everyone
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 19:32:34
the funny thing is, this is called the Trolling Thread, so I hope no one is trying to deny whats going on here.

It certainly is what's going on! The only question is who's trolling whom.

I would say however that the original post was a bit of a drastic assumption. Manipulation requires some aspect of truth to be altered to an untruthful state, while still under the guise of being truth. I don't think he is guilty of any such thing and so the premiss of your whole argument is irrelevant and this thread is pointless.

O RLY?

My contention is that he cherry picked one set of statistics in order to advance a certain position. Moreover, he cherry picked what I argued was the least appropriate set of statistics for the comparison he was making. Surely cherry picking counts as manipulation? It's presenting the statistics in such a way that might make the weaker argument appear to be the stronger.

Quote
Then you should take more care to make your jokes clearer
I thought it was pretty clear... I even separated it (didn't indent though) and the joke was immediately well received. To which I might add that normally my jokes fall flat.

I will make this clear; I am defending my joke it is very rare that I get a laugh and many at that! I will fight to the death on this issue. Now instead of us lancing each other verbally we can drop it and have hugs! and be forum pals. Do not attack my joke sir I need this one!

Very well. I am perfectly willing to put down my lance when there is a satisfactory resolution to the situation and I am convinced that malice was not the cause of the debacle.
Title: The Great Debate: Transportation Safety
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-25 22:54:14
I was interested in determining whether it is safer to travel by plane or car.  The answer should present itself if we examine data from multiple sources.  I have two sources, 1 for cars, and 1 for planes.  They are not infallible, but they appear to be reliable enough for our purposes.  Other sources are encouraged.

Plane Safety:  http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/01/11/336920/global-airline-accident-review-of-2009.html

Car Safety:  http://www.who.int/features/2004/road_safety/en/

In terms of Injuries and Deaths - Cars 1.2 Million deaths per year; 50 Million injuries per year.

                                                     Planes 806 Deaths per year (avg.); 31 Fatal Accidents per year.

Note that up to 30% of fatal car accidents involve a drunk driver (in the USA).  Also, many car accidents are collisions between vehicles and human beings or cyclists.  Plane crashes usually involve catastrophic mechanical failure, or a drastic pilot error - some automobile fatalities are a result of mechanical failure (but consider how often planes are maintanenced verus how many cars are poorly maintained).

And this is for planes:
Code: [Select]
•1990-94: 1.32 serious accidents per million departures.
•1995-99: 1.06.
•2000-04: 0.58.
•2005-09: 0.55.
By serious, I believe they mean involving a fatality.

It is clear to me that cars are much more dangerous than planes, but nearly all automobile fatalities are preventable while the trip is taking place, but it has been mentioned that plane accidents usually occur on takeoff or landing.

If I am driving a car, or in an area where cars are being driven, the introduction of a loud noise, an interesting scene, a hole in the road, or excessive speeds (and 1000 other factors) can create an accident in an instant.  The plane travels through air and is not subject to most of these factors.  However, outside forces can act on planes (bird strikes) and mechanical failure can happen in automobiles (Toyota Brake Failures).
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-25 23:16:37
That does not answer the question properly at all, because you have not used an average based on how many total journey's there are (and by that stat, cars come out 3X worse).

There are far far more car journeys than plane journeys, so obviously a sum total will show planes having less deaths.   (I also didn't realise it was this thread because of the post title, but since this is actually debating I will leave the post here).

You cannot use sum totals in this debate, as it is the most unfair stat going.
Title: The Great Debate: Transportation Safety
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-25 23:44:09
Well here is some data http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspx

By using the information here, I've calculated that there is 1 death per 292,865,490,000 vehicle miles traveled (in the USA) or a .000000000293% chance of dying for every mile you drive.  By injuries, it would be 52 times that number chance of sustaining an injury by driving. Insignificant indeed.  But then I found this.

Code: [Select]
Fatality rate per billion passenger miles traveled
Car (most dangerous)
 7.2
Airplane
 2.3
Bus
 2.0
Train (safest)
 0.5
http://airfare.michaelbluejay.com/modes.html#sources

From here http://airfare.michaelbluejay.com/modes.html With a list of sources.

I didn't check the math on each source, but its something to look at.  I would have to say that fatalities per passenger mile is  a good method of determining safety.  Journey numbers is too ambiguous.  Planes cover those miles faster, so in terms of "time spent in vehicle" planes are even more dangerous than simply by passenger mile.  Deaths per passenger hour of travel might be a better method.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Cupcake on 2011-03-25 23:51:17
Or he's trying to keep order in the forum that no longer needs, or wants you.  Sorry you're not terribly important to us, must have you questioning your self worth, considering you keep coming back.

I find this amusing, given the fact that you yourself said that you'd leave the forums a few weeks ago and said that you aren't important.

Then changed your mind five minutes later.

Mako talked me into staying, don't think it's of free will.  Also, the hatred/dislike of you stems from you trolling, and just being an asshole more often lately.  I don't know what caused it, but for the last week or so, you just seem to be on the warpath.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-25 23:58:26
Or he's trying to keep order in the forum that no longer needs, or wants you.  Sorry you're not terribly important to us, must have you questioning your self worth, considering you keep coming back.

I find this amusing, given the fact that you yourself said that you'd leave the forums a few weeks ago and said that you aren't important.

Then changed your mind five minutes later.

Mako talked me into staying, don't think it's of free will.

Oh, it's not free will?

Did she tie you up and prevent you from deleting your account?

Also, the hatred/dislike of you stems from you trolling, and just being an ahole more often lately.  I don't know what caused it, but for the last week or so, you just seem to be on the warpath.

Maybe that's just your perception. Anyway, what was it that sl said about no more personal attacks? Calling me an arsehole is certainly a personal attack. I'd be more careful, if I were you.

I leave this as my final warning: Any more personal attacks and said person will be moderated and I will filter their posts before they are posted. This goes for everyone
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: BloodShot on 2011-03-26 00:05:16
Did i miss something?  ???

This trolling thread seems true TL:DR material.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Cupcake on 2011-03-26 00:12:00
Or he's trying to keep order in the forum that no longer needs, or wants you.  Sorry you're not terribly important to us, must have you questioning your self worth, considering you keep coming back.

I find this amusing, given the fact that you yourself said that you'd leave the forums a few weeks ago and said that you aren't important.

Then changed your mind five minutes later.

Mako talked me into staying, don't think it's of free will.

Oh, it's not free will?

Did she tie you up and prevent you from deleting your account?

Also, the hatred/dislike of you stems from you trolling, and just being an ahole more often lately.  I don't know what caused it, but for the last week or so, you just seem to be on the warpath.

Maybe that's just your perception. Anyway, what was it that sl said about no more personal attacks? Calling me an arsehole is certainly a personal attack. I'd be more careful, if I were you.

I leave this as my final warning: Any more personal attacks and said person will be moderated and I will filter their posts before they are posted. This goes for everyone

1) Or, you know, I try to be a nice person every now and then, something I'm sure you know nothing about

2) I've gotten to the point where I don't give a shit, if I got moderated/banned, so be it, I really don't care, but I'm sick and tired of just holding my tongue so I don't get moderated/banned.  I sit mostly on IRC anyway.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 00:20:19
1) Or, you know, I try to be a nice person every now and then, something I'm sure you know nothing about


Is that so?

Well, a lot of people have commented on my helpfulness. In fact, I'm one of the most helpful people to people who have a problem with running or modding the game, as long as the person is polite and I know how to deal with it.

Of course, this happens in the on-topic forums, something I'm sure you know nothing about.

2) I've gotten to the point where I don't give a sh*t, if I got moderated/banned, so be it, I really don't care, but I'm sick and tired of just holding my tongue so I don't get moderated/banned.  I sit mostly on IRC anyway.

I see. Then let rip. I'm sure you have beefs with plenty of people. Why not make a thread about it?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Cupcake on 2011-03-26 00:25:02
1) Or, you know, I try to be a nice person every now and then, something I'm sure you know nothing about


Is that so?

Well, a lot of people have commented on my helpfulness. In fact, I'm one of the most helpful people to people who have a problem with running or modding the game, as long as the person is polite and I know how to deal with it.

Of course, this happens in the on-topic forums, something I'm sure you know nothing about.

2) I've gotten to the point where I don't give a sh*t, if I got moderated/banned, so be it, I really don't care, but I'm sick and tired of just holding my tongue so I don't get moderated/banned.  I sit mostly on IRC anyway.

I see. Then let rip. I'm sure you have beefs with plenty of people. Why not make a thread about it?
Lurking in on-topic ≠ not present in on-topic.  I just don't give a shit about people having issues running the game, mine are solved, save for one or two, which are uniquely mine, for various reasons, and not much I can do about them, so fuck it.  So what if I don't feel like typing up a guide for one person, so they understand how to install Aali's driver.  So what if you do?  Being able to go "HERP DERP I KNOWZ 'DIS HEREZ TEH INFOS" isn't anything to gloat about.


Actually... not really, only people I have an issue with right now, are you, and Jari, everybody else I'm actually on good terms with.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 00:29:54
I just don't give a sh*t about people having issues running the game, mine are solved, save for one or two, which are uniquely mine, for various reasons, and not much I can do about them, so f*ck it.  So what if I don't feel like typing up a guide for one person, so they understand how to install Aali's driver.  So what if you do?  Being able to go "HERP DERP I KNOWZ 'DIS HEREZ TEH INFOS" isn't anything to gloat about.

So you see no reason to help anyone at all, so long as all of your issues are solved?

Yeah, you're coming across as a really nice guy. I'm sure the forums will be much worse off when you leave or get banned.

Actually... not really, only people I have an issue with right now, are you, and Jari, everybody else I'm actually on good terms with.

If sl1982 keeps his promise, I think you might have issues with some other people as well.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: drfeelgud88 on 2011-03-26 00:43:41
Didn't bother reading this embarrassment of a thread (the trolling parts) so I'll just say one thing: Some people can really get into discussions as these.

I should read up on it to see why and what lead to these events. I'm afraid that by doing so, I would feel the need to punch myself in the gut for being all interested in a thread in which is calling certain people out.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Bosola on 2011-03-26 00:49:16
I really like reverse-engineering Squaresoft RPGs.

If only there were a forum where we could discuss it :(
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 00:54:12
I should read up on it to see why and what lead to these events. I'm afraid that by doing so, I would feel the need to punch myself in the gut for being all interested in a thread in which is calling certain people out.

I wouldn't recommend it, if for no other reason than the fact that you're unlikely to find any enlightenment. I suspect a lot of what has gone on here is a result of people bringing up deep resentments that they'd kept silent up until now, and keeping onto old grudges.

And a lot of the shitstorm stems from people confusing me with someone else.

I really like reverse-engineering Squaresoft RPGs.

If only there were a forum where we could discuss it :(

Have you tried facepunch?

I personally wish there were some way for people to go to their profile, click on the "ignore board options" link, tick the "completely unrelated" box and change their profile. Then they wouldn't have to see anything they didn't want to see.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: drfeelgud88 on 2011-03-26 00:58:11
I personally wish there were some way for people to go to their profile, click on the "ignore board options" link, tick the "completely unrelated" box and change their profile. Then they wouldn't have to see anything they didn't want to see.
You can do that? Wow, I did not know that; not that I would do it anyway to begin with. I'd rather just go about my business and do something else. It is not like "OMG I must read this!" ha.  ;D
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-26 01:06:27
Fatality rate per billion passenger miles traveled
Car (most dangerous)
 7.2
Airplane
 2.3
Bus
 2.0
Train (safest)
 0.5


Let's say that those are correct... they still show that the claim "Planes are the safest form of transport" is dubious to say the least, which is my main problem with the aviation authority and people who claim planes as safest.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 01:09:02
Let's say that those are correct... they still show that the claim "Planes are the safest form of transport" is dubious to say the least, which is my main problem with the aviation authority and people who claim planes as safest.

Not long ago, you were vehemently arguing that planes were more dangerous than cars. Now you're content to say merely that they are not the most safe method of transport. That's an interesting change in your argument. Could it be that you are considering the possibility that you were wrong?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jari on 2011-03-26 01:19:32
Seriously, you  need to learn to get your fun elsewhere.  This is a bit basic.  You have both got to such a point that you don't even care how obvious your trolling is...  it has become second nature to you.  While we are at it, trolling is a mental disorder and is strongly linked to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

In other words it makes you awful, bitter people; delighting in the trouble you cause.   All you serve to teach us in this thread is that you are not nice people and are both mentally disturbed.  Usually stems from childhood and upbringing.

Hey, you didn't say anything about winding people up! I am disappointed now. :/


A familiar pattern around here is the ones who don't contribute anything to FF7 are the same ones who go round trolling.  Always stuck in this section bringing up as many things as possible to get a reaction.  It is sad...  but not surprising that Kud is a regular over at 4chan.  :mrgreen:

So, contributing something to FF8 doesn't qualify? Drats, I knew I picked the wrong game. :|


The whole point of the statistical slant was to show that people who quote "Planes are the safest" are basing it on dodgy stats; parroting the propaganda and brainwashing that is peddled by the media and aviation, and that a fairer stat is the deaths by JOURNEY NUMBER.  I don't think anyone here feels safer knowing that they are more likely to die in a plane by journey number and instead think "oh well, by miles travelled I am...so...I will just think of happy thoughts.  It's gonna be a goooooood day.".  That would be crazy.  The reason the aviation use that stat is because it looks good (honestly, that's obvious).  The reason the insurers use the death by journey number is because it is a more faithful statistic.  Yes I said more faithful, not perfect.

Oh, fucking Jesus H Christ; on what God-forbidden grounds can you compare two methods of transportation that are as far apart as driving and flying using number of journeys? I believe Kudi-chan explained to you earlier why it makes no sense at all. Unless, of course, you indeed fly as often as you drive. Very, very few people do that.


I would also like to add that given the choice of death, most of us would like the sharp fast death of car. If something goes wrong in a plane, generally you will be alive for a long time, in utter panic the likes of which you cannot conceive.  You are placing your life in the hands of a human operator, and hence most accidents in plane are human error related.  I am afraid that human error does exist on plane.. it doesn't just stop because the Aviation's dodgy stats say so.

Hate to tell you this, but most traffic accidents don't kill you. They, however, might leave you disabled for the rest of your life. Plane crashes on the other hand have a pretty high and nice fatality rate.

And assuming you drive on public roads, you are rather likely to encounter other drivers, not to mention cyclists and pedestrians. Who usually also tend to be people. Each and any of those can cause an accident. Most of them don't have anywhere near the training an average pilot has, or even much of a screening.



I did not manipulate any statistics, as I did not compile the stats, I merely stated them.  The fact is, kud is just trolling and I would wager in direct conversation with his buddy, the lunatic Jari.   

Sorry to disappoint, but I haven't had direct contact with Kudi-chan for quite a few months. Unlike some people who seem to use rather high-schoolish methods of rallying up a gang via PMs, I don't think I need such tactics. I can hold my own just fine without a brigade of my own. I suspect Kudi-chan feels the same way. :)


We are never going back to the old days so move on.  :o

So.... why exactly do you edit your old posts, then?


I probably shouldn't have posted that picture, but what's done is done.  However, I think you do realize your bias and just want an argument.

But do you and SL realize your bias?

Not that I'd be complaining, I find it rather hilarious, being a big fan of hypocrites and all. :) I'm just curious whether it's intentional or not - because it is there. :)


Or he's trying to keep order in the forum that no longer needs, or wants you.  Sorry you're not terribly important to us, must have you questioning your self worth, considering you keep coming back.

I find this amusing, given the fact that you yourself said that you'd leave the forums a few weeks ago and said that you aren't important.

Then changed your mind five minutes later.

Mako talked me into staying, don't think it's of free will.

Oh, it's not free will?

Did she tie you up and prevent you from deleting your account?

(http://borgborg.org/lulz-u-made-a-funni.jpg)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-26 01:29:19
Not long ago, you were vehemently arguing that planes were more dangerous than cars.
-------

Several times I reinforced the statement that "at best" planes are "no more safe" and I said "They definitely are not the safest [overall]"

You should keep up.  I retracted the implication that "cars are definitely safer", as that was never really my problem.  My problem is that the aviation authority parrots the "safest" and so do people brainwashed into believing it.  There is nothing left to say on this.  I have made it clear.

Also, depending on which set of official stats you use (3 are compiled and I sent them), you get vastly different outcomes.  I personally believe death by journey number is fairer and so do aviation insurers.

You can try to prolong this if you wish, but there is nothing left to prolong, only your trolling. :P Have fun!
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Bosola on 2011-03-26 01:32:20
Quote from: Best and greatest, protector of visitors
I personally wish there were some way for people to go to their profile, click on the "ignore board options" link, tick the "completely unrelated" box and change their profile. Then they wouldn't have to see anything they didn't want to see.

On a serious note, why doesn't this board have an ignore function?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-26 01:33:18
Quote from: Best and greatest, protector of visitors
I personally wish there were some way for people to go to their profile, click on the "ignore board options" link, tick the "completely unrelated" box and change their profile. Then they wouldn't have to see anything they didn't want to see.

On a serious note, why doesn't this board have an ignore function?

It does doesn't it?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 01:33:32
Funny Jari that you still insist that I am biased since I just moderated someone who i regularly talk to for an attack on someone who I am clearly 'biased' against.  :roll:
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 01:36:11
Quote from: Best and greatest, protector of visitors
I personally wish there were some way for people to go to their profile, click on the "ignore board options" link, tick the "completely unrelated" box and change their profile. Then they wouldn't have to see anything they didn't want to see.

On a serious note, why doesn't this board have an ignore function?

It does, its in your profile.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jari on 2011-03-26 01:42:03
Funny Jari that you still insist that I am biased since I just moderated someone who i regularly talk to for an attack on someone who I am clearly 'biased' against.  :roll:

Oh, absolutely. Because you are.

Unless you are operating on a some kind of scale; do one biased thing, do one unbiased thing = problem solved, they negate each other! I don't think it works like that, and I doubt you do, either. :)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 01:44:31
You should keep up.  I retracted the statement that "cars are definitely safer", as that was never really my problem.

Really? Because it seemed that that was exactly your problem. That was the point we were arguing about. Don't deny it, because your posts are right there.

And if you edit them, you'll just incriminate yourself further.


Sorry to disappoint, but I haven't had direct contact with Kudi-chan for quite a few months. Unlike some people who seem to use rather high-schoolish methods of rallying up a gang via PMs, I don't think I need such tactics. I can hold my own just fine without a brigade of my own. I suspect Kudi-chan feels the same way. :)

Indeed. We're both big boys who can look after ourselves.

Seifie-kun, before making up conspiracy theories about Jari and I being in cahoots, you should look at the amount of times I have had an argument with someone and Jari has not involved himself. And vice versa. These incidents vastly outnumber the occasions when we both argue together. That last set of occasions only occurs when we both happen to agree on something and both feel strongly about it. Sowwy, there's no conspiracy :-(


http://borgborg.org/lulz-u-made-a-funni.jpg

Aw shucks. Well, I do try 8)

Funny Jari that you still insist that I am biased since I just moderated someone who i regularly talk to for an attack on someone who I am clearly 'biased' against.  :roll:

This is true, and I am pleased that you kept to your word.

However, the general tendency during this flame war has been to take the side of Seifer, assume that I am trolling and blame me for his overreactions. As I said earlier, to avoid saying anything that another member would not like just to keep the peace is simply appeasement. And, of course, appeasement does not prevent war; it merely postpones it and makes it worse when it finally happens. You can't treat some members as protected species.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 02:00:09

Funny Jari that you still insist that I am biased since I just moderated someone who i regularly talk to for an attack on someone who I am clearly 'biased' against.  :roll:

This is true, and I am pleased that you kept to your word.

However, the general tendency during this flame war has been to take the side of Seifer, assume that I am trolling and blame me for his overreactions. As I said earlier, to avoid saying anything that another member would not like just to keep the peace is simply appeasement. And, of course, appeasement does not prevent war; it merely postpones it and makes it worse when it finally happens. You can't treat some members as protected species.
[/quote]

Nobody is 'protected' around here, save for admins that are rarely here. Like i said before I have nothing against an argument. Only attacks. If you noticed I didnt even post anything in here before that. I dont care who is right or not. You attacked him first, hence you were warned first. Apparently this makes me DLPB's personal bodyguard. He was also warned that what he said was not ok either. Cupcake was moderated for what he said. Anyone else that says something will be as well, the rules apply to everyone.

Funny Jari that you still insist that I am biased since I just moderated someone who i regularly talk to for an attack on someone who I am clearly 'biased' against.  :roll:

Oh, absolutely. Because you are.

Unless you are operating on a some kind of scale; do one biased thing, do one unbiased thing = problem solved, they negate each other! I don't think it works like that, and I doubt you do, either. :)

Everyone has recieved what they deserve in my opinion. My conscience is clear. Except for you maybe. Yet you were Qhimm's friend, so maybe you have protected status as well.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: The Seer of Shadows on 2011-03-26 02:13:07
Why oh why do we care this much about whether planes are safer than cars or not?

To answer my own question: We don't.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 02:18:09
I suspect that nobody really does.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-26 03:07:46
I did, but for discussion to take place, at least one other person had to actually care.  There were multiple troll droppings between each 'Planes or Cars' post, so I guess I don't care anymore.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: yarLson on 2011-03-26 03:18:43
I suspect that nobody really does.
after reading this whole thing and being a third party who is not directly involved with either side, I can pretty much say this as a certainty  :evil:
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: drfeelgud88 on 2011-03-26 06:35:39
Why oh why do we care this much about whether planes are safer than cars or not?

To answer my own question: We don't.
We don't. This thread is now about who has the biggest "e-peen."

Scratch that above statement -- it was a bit harsh. I apologize.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Mako on 2011-03-26 06:56:04
What?!? Sl1982 an admin! yay!!!

Guess Qhimm likes your style  8)

Also for those of you wondering I am tired. Also I'd imagine this thread won't be here in the morning as completely unrelated chances aren't lookin to good.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: yarLson on 2011-03-26 07:03:57
haha whats really sad is that kudi put this post together in a few minutes and worked up 70 replies in a single day whereas I have been busting my ass on my project for the past several weeks and I have only racked up about 12 posts  :'(

honestly I find that hilarious
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-26 07:05:07
Congrats on the promotion.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 16:41:25
haha whats really sad is that kudi put this post together in a few minutes and worked up 70 replies in a single day whereas I have been busting my ass on my project for the past several weeks and I have only racked up about 12 posts  :'(

honestly I find that hilarious

I didn't start that thread; it was split off from another one.

Interestingly, obesebear decided to split the thread starting from the moment that I disagreed with Seifer, obviously implying that the mere act of disagreeing with him is trolling.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 17:27:32
There is no need to be putting words in peoples mouths. Maybe it got split at that point because it made the most sense? Disagreeing is not trolling, baiting maybe (but I dont think so in this case). But when an argument starts does it not make sense to split it at where the argument started?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 17:32:40
There is no need to be putting words in peoples mouths. Maybe it got split at that point because it made the most sense? Disagreeing is not trolling, baiting maybe (but I dont think so in this case). But when an argument starts does it not make sense to split it at where the argument started?

When it is put into a thread called the "trolling thread", it definitely does imply that my post was trolling.

But that's no surprise "Kudistos is trolling" seems to be repeated like a religious mantra by some people when I disagree with them (because of course, there's absolutely no way I might honestly think they were wrong!). At least, they repeat the mantra until they sit down and think about things for a while and realise that I was right.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 17:41:27
Yet perhaps not the first post was trolling. Even you cannot deny that trolling was going on in the thread at some point.


When it is put into a thread called the "trolling thread", it definitely does imply that my post was trolling.

But that's no surprise "Kudistos is trolling" seems to be repeated like a religious mantra by some people when I disagree with them (because of course, there's absolutely no way I might honestly think they were wrong!). At least, they repeat the mantra until they sit down and think about things for a while and realise that I was right.

I will agree that does happen. Yet it also goes the other way. Others get labeled the same just because of their past behaviour.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 17:56:56
Yet perhaps not the first post was trolling. Even you cannot deny that trolling was going on in the thread at some point.

Yes, but as I said earlier, the real question is "who was doing the trolling". The answer might not be as obvious as it first seems.

I will agree that does happen. Yet it also goes the other way. Others get labeled the same just because of their past behaviour.

The amount of time that people are mocked for their past behaviour is directly proportional to the stupidity of said past behaviour.

And although it's certainly vindicating to see people agree with me after weeks of "You is trollin'!", it's very frustrating to see that my arguments are immediately dismissed as trolling just because people either can't refute them or just don't like the person making them, and it's very frustrating to see people agree that I was right, but never acknowledge this fact. It would save everyone a lot of time, a lot of butthurt and a lot of U-turns (flip-flopping, for our Novomundane cousins) if people gave my arguments a fair hearing instead of ad homineming everything either due to personal grudges, or to avoid having to come up with an actual counter-argument.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-26 18:05:02
I've noticed instances where logical arguments are posted in response to some of your own, and they are ignored.  If saving time and butthurt were your objective, then perhaps responding to logical arguements presented would do this too.   And I don't like you or dislike you, or think you are right or wrong...I just enjoy pointing out things that haven't been noticed.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 18:05:40
I've noticed instances where logical arguments are posted in response to some of your own, and they are ignored.  If saving time and butthurt were your objective, then perhaps responding to logical arguements presented would do this too.   And I don't like you or dislike you, or think you are right or wrong...I just enjoy pointing out things that haven't been noticed.

Give examples.

This seems to be something my opponents often have a lot of trouble doing.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 18:09:26
Perhaps, but life isnt fair. As a person who 'trolled the trolls' you have been labelled as such. Is it right? No, but past behaviour is usually the best predictor of the future.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-26 18:09:32
I'm not your opponent.  I don't need to give examples because I don't need to prove something to you that I know to be true.  I don't care if anyone believes me or not.  If you don't think that you've ignored logical arguements then say so.  Or you could acknowledge that you have.  You know I'm perfectly capable of producing examples...but then they would be subject to your deluded scrutiny.  Where would that get us?  Another 70 posts of wasted time.  Or translated into KM languge = Win
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 18:16:49
Perhaps, but life isnt fair. As a person who 'trolled the trolls' you have been labelled as such. Is it right? No, but past behaviour is usually the best predictor of the future.

So if I troll trolls, does that mean I troll everyone for the fun of it, regardless of whether I think their argument has merit?

Or are you saying that when I get accused of trolling, you regard the people I'm arguing against as trolls? You've accused me of trolling for arguing against you many times; does that mean that you're a troll?

I must also remind you that during Hermoor's first stay here, before everyone started regarding him as a poor, innocent victim of cyber bullying, you treated him in a way that might be regarded as trolling the troll. So did obesebear.

My mouth has just written a cheque that my ass can't cash

Are you even trying? So you can make a claim with no evidence at all, then say "I know I'm right, so I don't need to prove anything"? How convenient!

You eat babies. I don't need to give examples because I don't need to prove something to you that I know to be true.

And your language has revealed that, contrary to your claims, you do have some sort of grudge against me. In fact, some of your language might be regarded as a personal attack.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-26 18:19:11
My language is the result of your calling me out.  Like I said, me putting up evidence is the first step towards the a pointless waste of time.  As of right now you don't believe me, and thats fine with me.  Ugh...what a defeat.

I can make a claim without evidence if I have no interest in the perception of my claim, yes.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 18:22:42
My language is the result of your calling me out.  Like I said, me putting up evidence is the first step towards the a pointless waste of time.  As of right now you don't believe me, and thats fine with me.  Ugh...what a defeat.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you called me out.

Yes, if I look at the order of the posts, you accused me of ignoring logical arguments before I said anything to you. So you called me out.

Ouch, that must be embarrassing!

And I strongly suspect your reluctance to show any evidence is because you either don't have any, or because you're worried that, when out under scrutiny, it might be revealed that those logical arguments I am accused of ignoring either might not have been ignored, or might not have been logical.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: yarLson on 2011-03-26 18:27:49
Actually its like he says, evidence isn't needed if you have read the thread, and since KM you've been defending yourself this whole time I assume you have read it and you know whether he is right or wrong so why point it out again and again. Honestly I think he was trying to be nice
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: xLostWingx on 2011-03-26 18:29:45
Yes, you're delusional.  Uh oh, is that a personal attack?  Nah, oh wait...I need to provide evidence.  Darn.  Guess you win again KM.

Oh I'm embarassed at your interpretation of my calling out out when in fact you referred to me as an opponent, and I was pointing out an observation...so embarassing.  You choose to use words like "accuse".  Well since we can choose which words to use, I'll say it is my opinion that you ignore logical arguements from time to time.  Now the arguement is over, because I'm merely stating an personal opinion.  Do you want to argue whether or not I hold this opinion?

Oh and I know that in situations such as this, your revised rules for winning are that I continue to post and waste my time.  So feel free to say whatever accusatory and off the wall things you want, because I won't be responding again. "Running Away" right?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 18:34:55

So if I troll trolls, does that mean I troll everyone for the fun of it, regardless of whether I think their argument has merit?

Or are you saying that when I get accused of trolling, you regard the people I'm arguing against as trolls? You've accused me of trolling for arguing against you many times; does that mean that you're a troll?

I must also remind you that during Hermoor's first stay here, before everyone started regarding him as a poor, innocent victim of cyber bullying, you treated him in a way that might be regarded as trolling the troll. So did obesebear.


Yeah at the beginning I probably did feed the trolls so to speak, unfortunately the Lulz thread is gone or you would see that I did not participate in it, or even condone what was going on. And lets see examples of where I accused you of trolling me.

And stop taking what I say as absolutes. Do you troll all the time? No. Is everyone you argue with a troll? No. Everytime you argue something are you trolling? No. Do you always troll the trolls? Usually, but not always.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 18:44:11
Actually its like he says, evidence isn't needed if you have read the thread, and since KM you've been defending yourself this whole time I assume you have read it and you know whether he is right or wrong so why point it out again and again. Honestly I think he was trying to be nice

Evidence is always needed.

And I have addressed the "logical" arguments that have been made against me in this thread. Indeed, Seifer actually agrees with me now. The point of my disagreement with him was about whether planes were safer than cars. He now agrees that they are. Apparently, his logical arguments were not only addressed, they were refuted. Of course, he won't admit it and is pretending that he was making a different point, but that's because it's so embarrassing to call someone a troll, accuse them of all sorts of horrid things and then realise that they were right.

Yes, you're delusional.  Uh oh, is that a personal attack?

Yes it is.

I'll say it is my opinion that you ignore logical arguements from time to time.  Now the arguement is over, because I'm merely stating an personal opinion.  Do you want to argue whether or not I hold this opinion?

Oh, it's your "opinion"? So you admit that there's no factual basis to your claims and it's just a subjective, emotional response? I hope you won't mind if I state my opinion:

Opinions are worthless.

Give me some facts next time, or at least some logic. You see, your claim was not about a subjective matter, such as whether Mozart was better than Beethoven, but about an objective one. If you say that I ignore logical arguments, that is a statement about a factual, objective matter. It is either right or wrong. Any "opinion" about such a matter is of no interest to me. We need facts and logic before such a claim can be taken seriously, and it looks like you can't provide them. Oh dear! How embarrassing!

Yeah at the beginning I probably did feed the trolls so to speak

As a person who 'trolled the trolls' I shall label you as such

And lets see examples of where I accused you of trolling me.

Let me just have a look through the past posts. It could take a while. I'll edit this post when I find some, unless there's a new post that it would be more appropriate to put them in. I definitely know there have been times when we have disagreed about some matter regarding moderation, and you have accused me of trolling.

EDIT:

Oh snap, the search function isn't working. Nor is the function for searching user posts. Does anyone know why the server load is so high? Maybe someone is trying to DDoS us.

Proof, in case anyone accuses me of lying:

(http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/7076/searchth.png)

And stop taking what I say as absolutes. Do you troll all the time? No. Is everyone you argue with a troll? No. Everytime you argue something are you trolling? No. Do you always troll the trolls? Usually, but not always.

Your actions do not match your words.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: yarLson on 2011-03-26 18:49:44
Okay, in a perfectly logical world, being personally attacked does not give you the right to do it right back. I agree with you that opinions are worthless, but the FACT is your just accusing people who accuse you. Truthfully it's no way to argue, and I think this thread should be closed down already. I dunno if you notice or not but your jumping around from person to person so much that your not really giving out too much evidence yourself. Saying something is one thing, but proving it is quite another. I don't think anyone here is really proving anything. In fact, I wish someone would just delete all this already.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 19:00:55
The thread stays open, Kudistos has the right to respond. Post any evidence you have in this thread Kudi-san.

Kudi, you may label me whatever you wish, but the fact of the matter is i stopped doing it, you didnt.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jari on 2011-03-26 19:20:52
No, but past behaviour is usually the best predictor of the future.

(http://borgborg.org/cheshire-cat-5.jpg)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Armorvil on 2011-03-26 19:42:40
Summary of the thread :

"You're a troll !"
"No, I'm not !"
"You're wrong !"
"No, I'm right !"

Brillant. Some people like to waste their time, and I wish I had that much on my hands. Contrary to popular belief, in these kinds of arguments, the winner is always the one who stops replying first. Not the arrogant one who wants to have the "last word".
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 20:26:54
Summary of the thread :

"You're a troll !"
"No, I'm not !"
"You're wrong !"
"No, I'm right !"

You're a troll.

The thread stays open, Kudistos has the right to respond. Post any evidence you have in this thread Kudi-san.


So, I've found that even when the search function is working, it doesn't work. It certainly doesn't display consistent results. Nevertheless, there is at least one definite example of you accusing me of trolling you when I simply disagreed. See the thread called completely unlrelated (http://forums.qhimm.com/index.php?topic=10573.0). Arguing for the sake of it is trolling, is it not? I mean, it implies that the purpose of the arguing is trouble causing, so that's classified as trolling. You also seem to accuse me of trolling you in the "The New Rules" thread (google cache is needed to see this one; the thread was deleted). Unfortunately, google doesn't seem to have a record of the whole thread, but there's one incident in which you might be interpreted as saying that I'm trolling. It's something that could be interpreted several ways, but you accuse me of just bitching about the rules and imply that I would have done so even if the rules had been different. That can be interpreted as an accusation of trolling, no?

I'll have a look for some more things when the search function is working better. I do recall quite a few times when you have dismissed any of my disagreements with the moderating system as being arguing "just for the sake of it". That is to say, trolling.

And hey, before anyone complains that I have not provided sufficient evidence, at least I've provided some evidence for my claims. That's more than anyone has done for their claims against me.

past behaviour is usually the best predictor of the future.

So, why do you allow a person who has been banned god knows how many times to have an account? If this person has threatened to kill people and spammed the boards with porn, don't you think he should be prevented from having an account? After all, past behaviour is usually the best predictor of the future.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 20:39:37
Heh. I think you and I have a different definition of trolling. Arguing just for the sake of it is just that. Some people like to be contrary as it can provide deeper insight to the topic at hand. Arguing for the purpose of getting a rise out of someone else is trolling.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: DLPB_ on 2011-03-26 20:45:19
You are all doing what I used to do.  Playing them at their own game.  The more you argue the more they are winning.  Leave the thread and let them talk to themselves.  They are clearly a pair of trolls and so there is no use trying to reason.  Kud for example, seems to have his own definition of everything.  be it troll or baiting...  he has his own definition of "good".  He has a warped justification for everything he is doing, and so does Jari. 
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 20:49:45
Heh. I think you and I have a different definition of trolling. Arguing just for the sake of it is just that. Some people like to be contrary as it can provide deeper insight to the topic at hand. Arguing for the purpose of getting a rise out of someone else is trolling.

Oh really? If you had accused me of "playing Devil's advocate", that might have got your meaning across better. As it is, your language suggested that I was just seeking to cause trouble. In any case, you were accusing me of arguing because I wanted to argue, not because I believed what I was saying. That's the central issue here. When you say that, you automatically give yourself a licence to ignore me, since I'm just arguing because I want an argument. You can use this technique to avoid ever having to engage with anything I say.

Furthermore, you said that and then took a dismissive tone, which adds more weight to the "it means trolling" interpretation of what you said than the "it means playing Devil's advocate".

You are all doing what I used to do.  Playing them at their own game.  The more you argue the more they are winning.  Leave the thread and let them talk to themselves.  They are clearly a pair of trolls and so there is no use trying to reason.  Kud for example, seems to have his own definition of everything.  be it troll or baiting...  he has his own definition of "good".  He has a warped justification for everything he is doing, and so does Jari. 

It's not like you don't have your own definition of certain words. After all, your definition of words like "trolling" and "baiting" seems to be "disagreeing with me" or "pointing out my mistakes". You also seem to have a strange definition of truth, one that does not resemble anyone else's definition of it.

BTW, you've just addressed me, haven't you? Isn't that "playing me at my own game"?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 20:55:36
I am more genuinely curious then anything. If he thinks he does not troll then I would like to understand why he thinks that. If he thinks he is always debating the topic at hand then perhaps that is all he is doing. Things like rules should never be concrete, intent should always play a factor in things.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 21:01:45
Heh. I think you and I have a different definition of trolling. Arguing just for the sake of it is just that. Some people like to be contrary as it can provide deeper insight to the topic at hand. Arguing for the purpose of getting a rise out of someone else is trolling.

Oh really? If you had accused me of "playing Devil's advocate", that might have got your meaning across better. As it is, your language suggested that I was just seeking to cause trouble. In any case, you were accusing me of arguing because I wanted to argue, not because I believed what I was saying. That's the central issue here. When you say that, you automatically give yourself a licence to ignore me, since I'm just arguing because I want an argument. You can use this technique to avoid ever having to engage with anything I say.

Furthermore, you said that and then took a dismissive tone, which adds more weight to the "it means trolling" interpretation of what you said than the "it means playing Devil's advocate".


Look, I am not a man of fancy words. If you interpreted what I said as something else well I apologize. As for the dismissive tone well that would most likely be because I did dismiss your opinion.
Not because I thought you were trolling, but because I did not agree with said opinion. (I cant remember the rules thread and couldnt find it on google)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-26 21:11:57
As for the dismissive tone well that would most likely be because I did dismiss your opinion.

Yes, you did. Without giving any reason why.

And it seems that other people in that thread agreed with me, including obesebear.

(I cant remember the rules thread and couldnt find it on google)

It was the one that was in the "projects" forum (then called "game tweaking"). Obesebear deleted it. For some reason, most of the debating about the rules that were made a year ago happened in that thread.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-26 21:26:33
Is that what your problem is? You feel we should have debated opinions?
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: gotenksssj22002 on 2011-03-27 02:53:39
isn't that technical what a forum is for debating things regardless of opinons or anything having a debate means all opinons/facts sud be listend to regardless of what u think of the person, or if you think their trolling if their post makes sences towards the topic at hand it can't be classed as trolling or just coursing an argument. i've notced from reading a few theads on this forum that some people desmiss other peoples opinons based of past but don't forget people grow/change over the years.

lol i wonder if i'll get flamed for this post  8-)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jaitsu on 2011-03-27 05:05:47
someone earlier said that thoughs that don't really contribute to the game (FF7) seem to troll the most, i hope they don't consider me a troll T.T

SL, if i remember correctly, a devils advocate is someone who does for themselves, and encourages others, to do what they feel they should do regardless of right or wrong (or was that just Sean O' haire.... sorry if i got that mixed up Kudistos).

i think that sometimes, people don't even really realize they're trolling, they're getting so deep into an arguement they make the transition and don't even realize it. i'm not sure whats gone on here, but this might be the case is all i'm sayin.

anyway sorry if this little tidbit was innaffectual. (i think that's how you spell it...)
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: The Seer of Shadows on 2011-03-27 09:03:08
SL, if i remember correctly, a devils advocate is someone who does for themselves, and encourages others, to do what they feel they should do regardless of right or wrong

Eh?  I don't think you remember correctly.  Google it.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Jaitsu on 2011-03-27 15:24:49
SL, if i remember correctly, a devils advocate is someone who does for themselves, and encourages others, to do what they feel they should do regardless of right or wrong

Eh?  I don't think you remember correctly.  Google it.

like i said i could have been wrong and i apologize if i was
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: drfeelgud88 on 2011-03-27 16:25:53
Why the heck does this thread keep poppin' up? (I know I know, because we are replying to it; just as I am doing right now)

This thread is random (I know the CU Forum is made for the purpose of "random"), but now it is so random that it is highly unreadable. It's random gibberish imo.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2011-03-27 16:58:14
Why the heck does this thread keep poppin' up? (I know I know, because we are replying to it; just as I am doing right now)

This thread is random (I know the CU Forum is made for the purpose of "random"), but now it is so random that it is highly unreadable. It's random gibberish imo.

Perhaps the forums should have a sage (sage) function? ;D

And I agree, it has served its purpose, whatever that purpose was. If I had the option, I'd lock it. I only have the "remove" option, however, and I'm always opposed to removing threads that aren't created by spambots.
Title: Re: Trolling Thread: For all your trolling needs
Post by: sl1982 on 2011-03-27 17:22:53
Very well, as long as everyone is satisfied that this thread has served whatever purpose it served I will lock it.