i wasn't pointing the finger at anyone just stating my own opinion and i know all about geohot i have read all his statements and agree with him fully that in purchasing a piece of hardware you buy the rights that go with your hardware and you should be allowed to do what you want to it but if jail breaking the console means playing pirated games or even backups or backing up your games on your HDD then that is violating the laws sony has prenounced..i believe in buying goods and you having full ownership of them don't get me wrong i think it's BS that sony sued him won i also think it's BS that you can't copy your own original games...i agree with you fully i just don't want sony to be left to rot in the dirt is all....i want to have a console to play in the near future..know what i mean!!?
But jailbreaking DOESN'T mean playing pirated games, or backups as the case may be. It simply means you can run un-signed code. If someone uses the jailbreak for such a purpose, then so be it, can't hold the messenger accountable for the message. Even so, Sony hasn't made any laws. You're not understanding the difference between a licensing agreement and a law. A licensing agreement isn't a law, it has no legal bearing. That being said, I have no real issue with Sony banning people with Jailbroken consoles from the PSN, because it violates the licensing agreement that you agree to when connecting to PSN. Sony can enforce a licensing agreement for services run by them. You agree to a PSN licensing agreement, you violate it, you can't use PSN, case closed. You agree to a licensing agreement to use the PS3, you violate it...Sony can't really do anything about it because that licensing agreement isn't law, and what you do on your own hardware is your own business, and they have to suck it up and deal with it. While I don't personally feel that game piracy is as daunting an issue as Sony makes it out to be, it is an issue, but one that they can't do much about, except implement working security measures (like using a random number instead of 4), and don't violate consumer protection laws.