Qhimm.com Forums

Miscellaneous Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: The SaiNt on 2001-10-20 05:33:00

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: The SaiNt on 2001-10-20 05:33:00

http://user.aol.com/axcel216/newtip19.htm#96BVR

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: dagsverre on 2001-10-20 10:28:00

And I quote:

"UPDATE: "Regarding the way human vision perceives colors rendered on a digital raster display, 96-bit color depth is a complete non-sequitur. The (average?) human eye is not capable
of distinguishing 96 bits of color depth. This hack only substantially slows down video performance."

Still cool though (not that I have one of those cards...I think...)

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Alhexx on 2001-10-20 10:42:00

96Bit ? Holy sh*t! I'm workin on 96 - 80 Bit :grin: ... hehe...

But, hey, the site's got some cool tricks..hehe

 - Alhexx

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Darkness on 2001-10-20 15:31:00

mine only supports 42 =(

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Alhexx on 2001-10-20 18:29:00

Have you ever seriously ran it on 42Bit ? I guess not. I mean between 16 and 32 Bit, there's a visual difference, but 32 and 42? Hm... I guess this count is fine, but not really useful.

 - Alhexx

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Darkness on 2001-10-20 20:01:00

oh, my bad. mine maxes at 36. i run it at 24

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Joey on 2001-10-26 10:59:00

The Human eye can distinguish between 96 bit colour and 32 bit ones. However, there are no programs capable of displaying 96 bit colour. 96 bits of colours will make your computer look dark and real life.

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Alhexx on 2001-10-26 16:26:00

Well, 32 Bit is enough for my Eye... :grin:

 - Alhexx

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Darkness on 2001-10-26 23:15:00

24 works for me :smile: i cant tell he difference between 24 and 36.......

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Sukaeto on 2001-10-27 03:40:00

The human eye can't pick up the difference after 24 bit.

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Joey on 2001-10-27 09:40:00

That's if you have a problem with your eyesight. Normally, if you can read words(Medium sized) from a kilometre away, you can tell the difference. Too bad that I'm gradually losing my bionic eyesight :sad:

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: M0T on 2001-10-28 21:02:00

bionic eyesight joey? what implant do you have then? and why are you losing it?  :grin:

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Sir Canealot on 2001-10-30 09:39:00

Quote

On 2001-10-27 05:40, Joey wrote:
That's if you have a problem with your eyesight. Normally, if you can read words(Medium sized) from a kilometre away, you can tell the difference. Too bad that I'm gradually losing my bionic eyesight :sad:

A kilometer Joey? This makes no sense. I bet I could tell the diffrnece. But I Can hardly read the board across the room with out my glass's. But my vision with in about 20-30 inch's in brilliant. I cant easyly spot jaggies in 1600/1200... theres still some in 1600/1200 with 4x FSAA.
I bet I could spot the diffrnece. I wont risk it though. Nah. 32 bit colourds for textures arent enough though. 32 bit textures in many games still present quite a bit of banding up close ect. I say move onto 64 bit just ffor the heck of it!

Title: Anyone tried this before?
Post by: Joey on 2001-10-31 06:53:00

I don't need glasses.  :grin: