Qhimm.com Forums

Miscellaneous Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: The Black-caped Man on 2007-12-31 16:58:45

Title: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2007-12-31 16:58:45
Since this is the greatest Final Fantasy forum on earth(or at least the greatest I found :-P) I am sure Final Fantasy VII is more than a game in your eyes. As for me, it changed my way of thinkin in real life. Yes I do have the belief of Final Fantasy VII. I believe that everything consists of a combination of Life stream particles(or as the christ would say: the "soul") and I do believe that our spiritual energy returns to the planet when were gone, as does our body(=decay). Then our consciousness joins the main Life Stream so that the particles are somehow shuffled and then somewhere else we are reborn. We are no longer WE but I'm sure that sometimes certain particles are the same than in our previous lifes. We are combinations of Life Stream particles and human DNA.

This is my belief.

Now I wanted to ask what you guys think? whats your believe? And did Final Fantasy VII also affect your way of life like in my case?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-02 05:24:41
Ah well it helped me look at things more maturely as a child, it also helped my puzzle solving abilities grow while I was young, due to the thinking nature of the game, but as for turning it into a belief like a religion, and taking it too seriously it's just a bit weird..

How old are you exactly?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 06:29:44
18 and you are exactly the people I dont understand. There are no facts about religion so why should this be wronger than anything else?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-01-02 06:48:37
It also shouldn't be "righter" than anything else, by that same principle. One thing I've noticed about religion in general is that all are possible, yet none can be proven by fact. There's evidence, there's faith, there's what seems to make sense, but ultimately the fact people still argue about religion constantly speaks for itself.
That said, there's really no reason to start believing in the lifestream, fayth, the matrix, or anything else. Consider it a possibility, sure. Truly believe in it, though? I don't think it wise to fill gaps in our knowledge with any answers just for the sake of self comfort. Assuming we don't all die in war or accident, we might find the truth eventually.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 06:54:18
No no I dont just copied the believe so Im finally satisfied or so. Long before playing Final Fantasy VII(I think I was 7 when I played it first) I already believed in rebirth. The Christendom never fit for me. I never believed in Heaven or Hell or other places we would reach. Final Fantasy VII just provided me with terms. Now I dont call it "soul" or spriritual energy, I call it Life stream. Now I dont call it rebirth(cause we wont be "WE" anymore after it) I call it returning. Thats all.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-02 07:07:26
I'm just one of those people that never bothered with religion, I don't waste my time with trivial facts/fiction in the event I may or may not die tomorrow, so "believing" in any religion let alone that of something based on a video game (wether you first thought about this stuff or not) saying that you believed in something similar before may have made more sense, but trying to back up what you believe in from a video game seems very childish.
When I was 7-10 I wanted to be like cloud and thought about stuff like that but I'm 17 and have a full time life so I can' think like that anymore.

I'm sorry if it comes across as condescending, but it's all just a little strange..

Also
Quote
One thing I've noticed about religion in general is that all are possible, yet none can be proven by fact.
I recommend watching the south park epidsode (Go Go God IIX) it's the second part to the evolution episode explains pretty much that were all believing in the same thing but under a different name (not counting rebirth)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 07:21:30
So its ok to believe in South park but not in Final Fantasy!?!?!?!

And yes with 7 I was already thinking about things like that. That always fascinated me since I was thinking. Since my mother died early I never had time for a childhood so I always acted far more experienced than my friends(Thats why some of them admired me, others hated me).
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-02 07:38:35
Quote
So its ok to believe in South park but not in Final Fantasy!?!?!?!
Dude what makes you think I "believe in it"

And my father died when I was young just FYI
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 07:49:34
The case with my mother should be no excuse for me, its just that I wanted to make you understand why I thought about believe in my early days.

And you said that southpark explains that we are all believing the same thing. What makes you think that its right? yes dude. The believe in it.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-02 07:53:10
No now your putting words in my mouth, belief as your putting it requires faith. I don't have faith.
I said south park explains it I didn't say weather it was right wrong or in between or weather or not I even believe in it.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 07:54:42
So if you dont believe in it why should I?^^
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-02 08:19:34
I've seen the episode so I know what you're talking about squeeble, and I agree to an extent.  Though there are differences in all religions, most have a common background and largely believe the same things.  And once World War III is over the world will most likely turn all Atheistic and fight each other.
But without the belief in something (flying spaghetti monster?) what's the point to living?  If there's no point to life why not just kill yourself or commit whatever crimes as you see fit since there really is no ultimate punishment?  The belief in something greather is what drives us to do good.

I don't know if FF7 has influenced my life in any way, except buying that damned crisis core psp.

I do find it strange that The Black Caped Man bases his religion off of a game, but really how much different is it than developing a religion off of a book, or being influenced because you heard an amazing speaker preaching his beliefs?

I'm just a regular ol' Christian btw
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 08:27:42
Wow....really.....wow....

You know every Chrisitan I talked to about believe thought Im completely stupid although I told him EXACTLY the same thing you just wrote.
Obesebear you are the coolest person Ive met in these forums up to now 8-)
And btw I didnt BASE my religion on it I just took over some terms, I wrote it in one of my posts.
But thats exactly what I always said to my friends, why not believe in this or that? Its the same as with the Christians. They base their religion on a man who lived 2000 years ago and whoom they never got to know. I see no point in that.
But dont get me wrong I have nothing against Christians, I just hate those who slag me off because of my belief and think theirs is somehow more right than mine cause thats just not true.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Borde on 2008-01-02 10:34:54
Jejeje... when WWIII is over... IF there is a WWIII there will be no one to fight. I saw recently a very interesting fact: even after years of nuclear disarming it has been calculated that if you put together EEUU's and Rusia's arsenal, you've got enough destructive power to destroy the world around 200 times.

Beliefs are certainly a complex topic. Even a pure atheist like myself must belive in something without having any rational proofs to back it up (such as the hability of makind to not destroy himself), so I don't feel like bashing others for their beliefs. But there is something that just pisses me off. Why must we have some kind of eternal reward (or punishment) to stop us from comitting crimes? We already have our own laws, so we don't need any divine entity to give us a set of rules.

About your theory The Black-caped Man, I've allways thought that FF7 had a very intersting point of view about the life cycle too. It's well know for everyone that matter cannot be destroyed, just tranformed. And thus when you die the matter of your body it's certainly recycled into something else, very much like the way lifestream recycles energy. I can see that FF7 was just an update for your already existing beliefs, but I also understand why Squeeble thought it was a disturbing idea the way you put it at first.

As for the main topic, there has been one sentence of FF7 that certainly helped me. It's something that Cloud says when Aeris dies. I don't know how it was translated in english, but in Spanish it was "Se acabó el reir, se acabó el llorar..." (No more laughs, no more tears...). I used to be very worried about dying, about wasting my life. But after reading that sentence I understood I shouldn't care about that. No matter what I do or don't do. When I die, it will be the end, and I won't feel good or bad any more. I know I could have read this somewhere else, but it had a deep impact for me in that situation.

By the way, my father died when I was young, but I won't say I had no infancy. It just wasn't a very happy infancy...
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-02 11:26:09
I know which sentences you mean:

Cloud:"Aerith! This cant be real!"
Sephiroth:"Do not worry. Soon the girl will become part of the planets energy.
All that is left is to go north. The promised land waits for me over the snowy fields.
There I will become a new being by uniting with the planet. As will this girl...."
Cloud:"Shut up. The cycle of nature and your stupid plan dont mean a thing! Aerith is gone...
Aerith will no longer talk, no longer laugh, cry or get angry....
What about us? What are WE supposed to do? What about my pain?
My fingers are tingling.....my mout is dry.....my eyes are burning!"
Sephiroth:"What are you saying? Are you trying to tell me you have feelings too?"
Cloud:"Of course! Who do think I am!"
Sephiroth:"Ha, ha ha....Stop acting as if you were sad.....
Theres no need to act as though youre angry either.....
Cause Cloud, you are..............................
................................................
.........(Jenova Battle)..................
................................................
Youre just a marionette!"

PS: yeah yeah. Call me freaky but after 100times playing I know every sentence in the game^^ :wink:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-01-02 11:54:23
But there is something that just pisses me off. Why must we have some kind of eternal reward (or punishment) to stop us from comitting crimes? We already have our own laws, so we don't need any divine entity to give us a set of rules.

Yeah. For some bizarre reason both of the resident Jesus-freaks proposed the same idea that obesebear posted.

I'll never understand why someone would need the notion of ultimate - or any kind - punishment to be nice. Except of course, if the person is so lacking in morals that he can be only threatened to do the right thing. Then again, based on my experiences with religious people, it all makes sense now...
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: spyrojyros_Tail on 2008-01-02 21:19:33
I have recently become more interested in the idea of the lifestream and I have been doing a little bit of work in this area, it nearly drove me to insanity, but ill share my findings. I would recommend you watch "The Secret" and Bill Hicks

Now I believe that the most logical idea of where we came from would be from the meteor that hit the earth and killed the dinosaurs, kinda like the cetra. After the dinosaurs were wiped out we suddenly appeared, so im thinking there was something inside that meteor that created us as we know it now, or influenced earths lifestream if we can call it that (Thats what I think anyway, I could be wrong).

Sp if you watch "The Secret" (http://www.thesecret.tv/) you will find out that we are living in a world where everything that in the universe is energy. So im going to put a few quotes from the film in here

"So and we can ask the question what creates the world around us he or she will say energy, well describe energy; it can never be created or destroyed, it always was and always has been, it is everything that ever existed it always exists, and its moving into form, through form and out of form.

So you can go to a theologian and say what created the universe and he or she will say god, ok describe god; always was and always has been, never be created or destroyed,  it always was and always has been, it is everything that ever existed it always exists, and its moving into form, through form and out of form.

Its the same description just different terminology

So who are we? We are spritual beings, we are an energy field operating in a larger energy field."

So this kinda fits in with bugenhagens version of events (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpn5YCOju00&feature=related). So we are all blessed with this spirit energy when we are brought into the world, an energy that always was and always has been.

Now if you want Bill Hicks version of events (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX1CvW38cHA): "“Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves."





Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: spyrojyros_Tail on 2008-01-02 21:23:59
I have recently become more interested in the idea of the lifestream and I have been doing a little bit of work in this area, it nearly drove me to insanity, but ill share my findings. I would recommend you watch "The Secret" and Bill Hicks

Now I believe that the most logical idea of where we came from would be from the meteor that hit the earth and killed the dinosaurs, kinda like the cetra. After the dinosaurs were wiped out we suddenly appeared, so im thinking there was something inside that meteor that created us as we know it now, or influenced earths lifestream if we can call it that (Thats what I think anyway, I could be wrong).

Sp if you watch "The Secret" (http://www.thesecret.tv/) you will find out that we are living in a world where everything that in the universe is energy. So im going to put a few quotes from the film in here

"So and we can ask the question what creates the world around us he or she will say energy, well describe energy; it can never be created or destroyed, it always was and always has been, it is everything that ever existed it always exists, and its moving into form, through form and out of form.

So you can go to a theologian and say what created the universe and he or she will say god, ok describe god; always was and always has been, never be created or destroyed,  it always was and always has been, it is everything that ever existed it always exists, and its moving into form, through form and out of form.

Its the same description just different terminology

So who are we? We are spritual beings, we are an energy field operating in a larger energy field."

So this kinda fits in with bugenhagens version of events (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpn5YCOju00&feature=related). So we are all blessed with this spirit energy when we are brought into the world, an energy that always was and always has been.

Now if you want Bill Hicks version of events (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX1CvW38cHA): "“Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves."

So the lifestream to me seems as logical as you can put it.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Borde on 2008-01-02 22:25:00
Wooo... man, sure you must have played a lot of times in order to remeber the script so accurately The Black-caped Man. Yes, that's the dialog I was refering to.

Exactly El Ammo Bandito! But even for those who resist to follow the basic implicit rules that keep our society working, we've got the law and the police to punish them without the need of a god.

Just to clarify something spyrojyros_Tail, hominids (not to talk about homo sapiens) didn't appeared exactly when the dinosaurs disappeared. There was a HUGE lapse of time between their death and the birth of our race.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-02 23:34:28
If there's no point to life why not just kill yourself or commit whatever crimes as you see fit since there really is no ultimate punishment?  The belief in something greather is what drives us to do good.


My life driving force is love, love of my friends family, the girl I'm painfully in love with, and I don't need any god or something telling me if I don't do right I'll burn because I do whats right out of the kindness of my heart not a book or a higher being telling me how to do it.
But it seems common sense isn't so common anymore these days with groups of youths...


Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-03 00:58:16
@ Borde

Are you sure dinosaurs and humans didn't coexist?  In one of my religion classes I remember hearing about some type of proof that they did live together.  The reasons Dinosaurs grew so large was because of a layer of ice covering the Earth's atmospere creating a sort of greenhouse effect that allowed all life to live much longer than we consider normal these days.  Which would explain the different ancient texts with accounts of humans living hundreds of years.  This layer of ice was obviously destroyed by a meteor(s) and caused a massive flood... anyways, I'm interested if anyone else has learned or at least heard of this before.

@ Squeeble

I'm glad you don't need a higher force dictating the way you act because of the threat of extreme punishment.  That's great.  I grew up in middle class America and was force fed religion until I was 18, so I had very little interaction with Atheists.  While I consider myself open minded in all things, it doesn't mean I completely understand other religions (or lack thereof).  But I do have trouble comprehending how Atheists don't believe in a higher power/being, though being Agnostic does make a lot of sense...
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Synergy Blades on 2008-01-03 01:24:04
Quote
In one of my religion classes I remember hearing about some type of proof that they did live together.

 :-D

Maybe this (http://www.creationmuseum.org/) would be right up your religion class teacher's alley. The best way to describe this sort of thing is that attempting to twist science to prove an outcome you've already decided upon (based on a religious book, or whatever), is a bit dangerous, and surely the antithesis of the scientific method (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Method).

Quote
But I do have trouble comprehending how Atheists don't believe in a higher power/being

I suppose atheists think the same of religious believers. Personally, my train of thought runs parallel to that of logic; ideas that you can come up with that contain religion, I apply logic and reason to. For instance: there is a Heaven. Where? What proof is there of this? Is there any science/hard fact that can back up such an assertion? Ultimately, what most (if not all) of this logical questioning comes back to is something like the following: "because Jesus/God/... said", or "because it says in the Bible" - or rather, "because it just is, and my religion/I choose to believe it that way" - with no actual logic, reasoning or proof behind it (the discussion of the motives behind the writers of religious texts is another post altogether).

To point to the mysterious, the unknown (and moreover, the never-knowable... "how can you prove god doesn't exist?") just because there are gaps in our understanding - such as you find with Creationists against evolution - is really the fall of the provable and the rise of the fanciful; this sort of thing could often be found in centuries past where concepts such as the stars in the sky being "heavenly bodies" or twinkling gods watching over us were common - because we simply lacked the understanding, and filled in the gaps with whatever mysterious ideas our heads could collectively come up with. As we enter recent centuries, "the unknown" gives way; our scientific and mathematical understanding grows, and so the need for religion seems to be slipping with regards to the immediate world around us, and long-established religious bodies become afraid of change. Not so with science. Take again the theory of evolution - you know what, it isn't perfect, it has holes, but it's the best working explanation we've got, with provable, tangible evidence and postulates. It may morph into something entirely different as we continue to push and poke at it, but that's the beauty of science - it moves forward, it accepts critique, it can even do a complete U-turn, but there's always the scientific method/logic/proof used to get it there.

Alas, as much as our understanding moves forward in leaps and bounds, human suffering lingers on, and many people's lives can be stricken with difficulties, and so the need for people to reach out for an otherworldly presence watching over them - comforting, reassuring - when bad things happen, or to get them through life on a daily basis, remains, and probably will for centuries to come.

Pardon me for the monologue.  :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-01-03 01:39:26
@ Borde

Are you sure dinosaurs and humans didn't coexist?  In one of my religion classes I remember hearing about some type of proof that they did live together.  The reasons Dinosaurs grew so large was because of a layer of ice covering the Earth's atmospere creating a sort of greenhouse effect that allowed all life to live much longer than we consider normal these days.  Which would explain the different ancient texts with accounts of humans living hundreds of years.  This layer of ice was obviously destroyed by a meteor(s) and caused a massive flood... anyways, I'm interested if anyone else has learned or at least heard of this before.

Religion. Educating people about biology since 0 AD. :lol:

I do not even dare to ask why religion class is doing Creationism / Young Earth brainwashing instead of... you know, teaching things about religions in general.

I think that I can answer for Borde, though: scientific proof. All the reliable sources suggest that dinosaurs - save for their avian offspring; birds - perished about 65 million years ago. First humans - and these are not even Homo Sapiens - appeared about 200 000 years ago. There's a 64 800 000 year gap between them. Which is 324 times longer period of time than the 200 000 years during which humans have existed in some shape or form.


EDIT: Damn you Synergy Blades! Damn you and your fast fingers! :lol:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Synergy Blades on 2008-01-03 01:47:51
Quote
EDIT: Damn you Synergy Blades! Damn you and your fast fingers!

(http://www.lolcats.com/images/u/07/34/lolcatsdotcomapif8cpspt0k87dj.jpg)

Ah, but Jari, would you rather have my fast fingers, or your ability to condense my argument down to three lines?  :lol:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-01-03 02:24:48
Theories based on theories...

I think everything in this topic points towards one thing. We don't know jack.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-03 12:20:21
Synergy Blades is absolutely right!

The reason why I dislike all Chrisitans I know is that theyre all like you said: They insist on their religion, are not open minded, dont understand anything else. They just say the things you wrote: Because Holy Bible said bla bla, because Jesus once said bla bla....Why should Jesus be more holy than me or you guys? We never got to know him. I think he was just a good speaker and lived in a time where people could easily be convinced by supernatural things thats all.
I have no problem with Chrisitans in general, but I hate the way the influence people in their belief:
It starts with the stupid baptism. What are they thinking? They are more or less forcing you to be in there, if you want it or not. I wish I had never been baptised. Then they continue with Religion as a subject at school. Thats just wrong. You are told: This is so, this is that way. Thats just completely wrong. Then we got the church, which uses its religion to make money with it.(=>church rate) And the best thing is when I confront my religion teacher with that, he always says: "But we have to show them the "right" way of belief"!
WRONG: There is no right way. At least no way thats righter than others.

I think religion as a subject at school should be completely forbidden till High School or so. Then there should be such a subject, but the teacher shouldnt just say: That is this way and so on. He should ask the pupils what they believe and maybe put his own belief in. It should be a kind of supernatural discussion where everyone says what he believes and where others accept that and do not try to convince him. This would be and ideal idea right?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Master Ridley on 2008-01-03 14:35:40
Since this is the greatest Final Fantasy forum on earth(or at least the greatest I found :-P) I am sure Final Fantasy VII is more than a game in your eyes. As for me, it changed my way of thinkin in real life. Yes I do have the belief of Final Fantasy VII. I believe that everything consists of a combination of Life stream particles(or as the christ would say: the "soul") and I do believe that our spiritual energy returns to the planet when were gone, as does our body(=decay). Then our consciousness joins the main Life Stream so that the particles are somehow shuffled and then somewhere else we are reborn. We are no longer WE but I'm sure that sometimes certain particles are the same than in our previous lifes. We are combinations of Life Stream particles and human DNA.

This is my belief.

Now I wanted to ask what you guys think? whats your believe? And did Final Fantasy VII also affect your way of life like in my case?

Change soul to spirit and your on the right track. It has been scientifically proven that the Literal, physical spirit (that potentially can become a ghost) is actually the magnetic field of the human body. The Spirit is not only the bodies magnetic field but also the current consciousness of that life. When you die, your magnetic field becomes part of the planets magnetic field.

Your Ghost is a complete copy of your spirit that is created by your spirit attaching itself to an object of great importance, most likely a precious item within a house or the house itself and it becomes active after the person dies. A Ghost even has a consciousness, somewhat.

The soul is something different. It's your essence and that can travel elsewhere, either after you die or before you die during a traumatic event. If the Soul leaves your body early, your spirit takes over your consciousness. Of course, you won't notice though.

If this is confusing, sorry.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Borde on 2008-01-03 15:51:31
I don't know if I can say this without being offensive, but I'll do my best: Creationism is a threat to sience and, don't doubt about it, a threat to society itself. But I just can't grasp the reason why the Christian church has come up with this absurd idea. It's because they are loosing belivers? Maybe it's because science has proven wrong theories mistaken as absolute truth by the church? If they really want to be taken seriously they should just accept that their duty is to confort people's heart's and give moral advice (even if religion isn't the only way), not to explain the world around us. If their sacred texts are wrong (or at least unlikely) why not just say that they are figurative? I think it would be the most elegant way to settle down this useless discussion of once and for all. When used correctly, religion cannot contradict science because they play in completly separeted fields.

Telling the students to simply ignore the currently accepted theories looks like a very dangerous lesson to me. Sure, anyone can come up with it's own theory about anything that hasn't been explained irrefutably (that is, nearly anything). And that's not bad, in fact this is the way science advances. But it just cannot be directly put at the same level of the current theory accepted by the sientific community. And the reason is that those theories are backed up with a collection of facts that make them more likely than all the others.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-03 16:16:21
I think science is a large reason why a lot of orthodox churches are shrinking in numbers and followers.  Hundreds of years ago the church believed the Earth was the center of the universe, but when the Heliocentric system was proposed it was considered blasphemous. 

It's a good example of how any religion cannot be taken too literally.  The sun being the center of the universe has nothing to do with God existing, and it took some years before the church finally understood this.  It's much the same today with evolution being the forefront of disproving creationism.  Though it is possible evolution could have happened on such a massive scale over billions of years, whats to say a greater power didn't have a hand in it?

The problem is many people take their religion far too seriously causing them to be blindingly close-minded.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-03 19:28:52
Exactly. Its that close-mindness that really dissappoints me. Good to see that I can talk with you guys about this topic without being called "Anti-Christ Fucker" or "Unholy Metal Ass".
These are the terms people usually use against me although Im very open-minded. Well, this is how far it has come in todays society.......
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-04 07:48:48
Good to see that I can talk with you guys about this topic without being called "Anti-Christ f***er" or "Unholy Metal Ass".
These are the terms people usually use against me although Im very open-minded. Well, this is how far it has come in todays society.......

You should tell those people that grammar fails them and to think of a better slanderous comment, rather than sounding like a 10 year old lol.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-04 09:02:05
Thats precisely what I do but in fact it doesnt help me much.......well I dont mind these people anyways.....
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Freman on 2008-01-04 20:36:19
The reason why I dislike all Christians I know is that they're all like you said: They insist on their religion, are not open minded, don't understand anything else. They just say the things you wrote: Because Holy Bible said bla bla, because Jesus once said bla bla....Why should Jesus be more holy than me or you guys? We never got to know him. I think he was just a good speaker and lived in a time where people could easily be convinced by supernatural things thats all.

That's very open minded of you. Especially considering almost every criticism you level at them could be turned back on you. The central tenet of Christianity is the resurrection, either it happened or it didn't. If it didn't then Christianity is false. Unlike evolution (defined as the idea that all living things are descended from a single form which in turn arose from non-living matter) it could have been falsified. It wasn't.

I don't know if I can say this without being offensive, but I'll do my best: Creationism is a threat to science and, don't doubt about it, a threat to society itself. But I just can't grasp the reason why the Christian church has come up with this absurd idea. It's because they are loosing believers? Maybe it's because science has proved wrong theories mistaken as absolute truth by the church? If they really want to be taken seriously they should just accept that their duty is to confront people's heart's and give moral advice (even if religion isn't the only way), not to explain the world around us. If their sacred texts are wrong (or at least unlikely) why not just say that they are figurative? I think it would be the most elegant way to settle down this useless discussion of once and for all. When used correctly, religion cannot contradict science because they play in completely separated fields.

Creationism is not a threat to science, after all most fo the founders of science would have been described as young earth creationists. Newton, Pasteur, Maxwell, etc. Creationism is not a threat to society but Evolution might be; after all the biggest butchers in history like Hitler and Stalin were evolutionists.

Its logical that as the Biblical claims about history are rejected then its moral claims will be rejected also.

I think science is a large reason why a lot of orthodox churches are shrinking in numbers and followers.  Hundreds of years ago the church believed the Earth was the center of the universe, but when the Heliocentric system was proposed it was considered blasphemous.

I would say that the atheistic dogma being pumped into students is indeed resulting in falling numbers of Christians in the west. Your knowledge of history is somewhat limited however. Heliocentric cosmology has been around since the time of the Greeks, Copernicus proposed it as an alternative to the Aristotelian geocentric model and it was treated as an interesting model. Galileo ran into trouble for two main reasons, in the wider geopolitical conflict between Protestantism and Catholicism someone who challenged the authority of churchmen to interpret scripture was instantly offside with the Church. His other fault was allowing his book to be seen as mocking the Pope. At least it was the Pope, a secular leader would probably have chopped his head off. Meanwhile Galileo couldn't present evidence to support his contention that wasn't equally well explained by Tycho Brae's geocentric model that had the Sun revolving around the Earth and the other planets revolving around the Sun.

Actually you can still mathematically construct a geocentric model of the Solar System that provides all the predictive power of the heliocentric model without anyone being able to prove it wrong.

Religion. Educating people about biology since 0 AD. cheesy

I do not even dare to ask why religion class is doing Creationism / Young Earth brainwashing instead of... you know, teaching things about religions in general.


Are you familiar with the name Carolus Linnaeus, a devout Christian and YEC whose biological classification system is still used today?

To point to the mysterious, the unknown (and moreover, the never-knowable... "how can you prove god doesn't exist?") just because there are gaps in our understanding - such as you find with Creationists against evolution - is really the fall of the provable and the rise of the fanciful; this sort of thing could often be found in centuries past where concepts such as the stars in the sky being "heavenly bodies" or twinkling gods watching over us were common - because we simply lacked the understanding, and filled in the gaps with whatever mysterious ideas our heads could collectively come up with. As we enter recent centuries, "the unknown" gives way; our scientific and mathematical understanding grows, and so the need for religion seems to be slipping with regards to the immediate world around us, and long-established religious bodies become afraid of change. Not so with science.

You've managed to display your own indifference to logic. There are positive logical, philosophical and historical arguments for the necessary existence of God. There are actual positive arguments against the idea of evolution (as described above) not least that all observed changes in species involving sorting and loss of existing genetic information, not the gain that would be necessary for an amoeba to become an anthropologist. That's why evolutionists usually resort to equivocation, the whole "we see dogs form new varieties of dogs, therefore a reptile turned into a dog" argument.

My life driving force is love, love of my friends family, the girl I'm painfully in love with, and I don't need any god or something telling me if I don't do right I'll burn because I do whats right out of the kindness of my heart not a book or a higher being telling me how to do it.
But it seems common sense isn't so common anymore these days with groups of youths...


You've just described why you do something, not why it's right or wrong. That's the key issue; why is something right or not? Meanwhile the Christian insists that all human beings (being originally created in God's image) know at least something of right and wrong so your position is entirely consistent with our beliefs.

So and we can ask the question what creates the world around us he or she will say energy, well describe energy; it can never be created or destroyed, it always was and always has been, it is everything that ever existed it always exists, and its moving into form, through form and out of form.

So you can go to a theologian and say what created the universe and he or she will say god, ok describe god; always was and always has been, never be created or destroyed,  it always was and always has been, it is everything that ever existed it always exists, and its moving into form, through form and out of form.

Its the same description just different terminology

So who are we? We are spritual beings, we are an energy field operating in a larger energy field.


It's wonderful to construct other people's arguments. It avoids having to engage with real arguments.

Energy exists only in the sense that it's always present. The second law of thermodynamics tells us that the sum total of available energy is in a state of decrease. The general term for that in an increase in disorder. Visualize it as a clock running down. Consequently it actually is part of an argument for a creator, if a clock is winding down then at some point something had to wind it up. Since energy is the most fundamental unit in the universe whatever raised the energy to its initial level is probably outside the universe, this is accepted as one of the qualities of God.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Synergy Blades on 2008-01-04 21:53:13
Quote
the atheistic dogma being pumped into students

What dogma is this? The dogma that people can believe what they like, make up their own mind (preferably when their minds are at an age they can comprehend what's being told to them), and are free to do so and live without influence by one particular religion over the populace? Or perhaps those atheists that go round countries converting everyone by the sword, or those atheists that fly themselves into tall buildings to make them topple? Or perhaps those atheists that kill their own family because their son-in-law belongs to the wrong caste (http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/01/01/family.dead.ap/index.html?sid13)? Yes, atheists do bad things too, but usually that's a psychological, mental or other societal problem, not because a twisted dogma tells them they're doing the right thing.

Quote
after all the biggest butchers in history like Hitler and Stalin were evolutionists.

Ergo, all evolutionists are dangerous? Surely a poor argument; Hitler was a Christian (http://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm) but the argument that, therefore, Christians are likely to be the most dangerous is ridiculous, since not all Christians are alike (though some share the same source for their beliefs, without being able to use free will and free decision about their ethics and morals, which could be construed as dangerous). I could also say Hitler and Stalin have moustaches, ergo, all people who have moustaches are the biggest threats to humanity.  :|

Quote
You've managed to display your own indifference to logic. There are positive logical, philosophical and historical arguments for the necessary existence of God. There are actual positive arguments against the idea of evolution (as described above) not least that all observed changes in species involving sorting and loss of existing genetic information, not the gain that would be necessary for an amoeba to become an anthropologist. That's why evolutionists usually resort to equivocation, the whole "we see dogs form new varieties of dogs, therefore a reptile turned into a dog" argument.

Logical, philosophical and historical arguments that simply lack any verifiable or even falsifiable proof. That lack of falsifiability means we can make no arguments against religion or a higher being - it becomes "untouchable". I already mentioned that evolution has holes, and as a person behind the cause of science it doesn't mean that I'm willing to substitute the notion of some almighty creator - without proof - where those holes reside. So evolution may not be totally correct; what are you suggesting in its place? Something unprovable by science, that cannot be seen, touched, felt, observed, calculated, or even understood - and if so, why?

Quote
if a clock is winding down then at some point something had to wind it up. Since energy is the most fundamental unit in the universe whatever raised the energy to its initial level is probably outside the universe, this is accepted as one of the qualities of God.

You're doing what I suggested here, jumping straight to the fantastical from a lack of knowledge.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-01-04 22:16:47
Creationism is not a threat to science, after all most fo the founders of science would have been described as young earth creationists. Newton, Pasteur, Maxwell, etc. Creationism is not a threat to society but Evolution might be; after all the biggest butchers in history like Hitler and Stalin were evolutionists.

Evolution is not a threat to society but Christianity might be; after all the biggest butchers in history like Pope Urban II, Pope Eugene III, Pope Innocent III - har har, what a funny name - and Pope Honorius III were not only Christians, but also leaders of the church.


Its logical that as the Biblical claims about history are rejected then its moral claims will be rejected also.

Yes! Because I think Dubya should be hanged - preferably by some other part of his body than neck - I also shall not use neither Intel's or AMD's CPUs or nVidia's cards, because by golly, these are eeeevil American companies. It's extremely logical!

Anyway, do I even need to ask why someone who believes in the invisible man in the sky suddenly developed an interest in logic?


I would say that the atheistic dogma...

Since atheism is not a religion, it doesn't have dogmas, either. I admit that some atheist certainly act like it's a religion, but that's their problem.


Actually you can still mathematically construct a geocentric model of the Solar System that provides all the predictive power of the heliocentric model without anyone being able to prove it wrong.

Considering that James Bradley proved it wrong in 1725, I'd beg to differ.


Religion. Educating people about biology since 0 AD. cheesy

I do not even dare to ask why religion class is doing Creationism / Young Earth brainwashing instead of... you know, teaching things about religions in general.


Are you familiar with the name Carolus Linnaeus, a devout Christian and YEC whose biological classification system is still used today?

*facepalm*

Familiar enough that I know his given first name.

I can also see that you really hit the nail on the head, there. Totally got my point, and all that.


There are actual positive arguments against the idea of evolution (as described above) not least that all observed changes in species involving sorting and loss of existing genetic information, not the gain that would be necessary for an amoeba to become an anthropologist. That's why evolutionists usually resort to equivocation, the whole "we see dogs form new varieties of dogs, therefore a reptile turned into a dog" argument.

Oooops (http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB102.html). And this (http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB101_2.html).


It's wonderful to construct other people's arguments. It avoids having to engage with real arguments.

Energy exists only in the sense that it's always present. The second law of thermodynamics tells us that the sum total of available energy is in a state of decrease. The general term for that in an increase in disorder. Visualize it as a clock running down. Consequently it actually is part of an argument for a creator, if a clock is winding down then at some point something had to wind it up. Since energy is the most fundamental unit in the universe whatever raised the energy to its initial level is probably outside the universe, this is accepted as one of the qualities of God.

Why are you just quoting some Creationist / ID handbook for arguments, then? If you'd want real arguments, you should come up with your own.

Plus, here (http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CF/CF001.html)'s something you might want to read about second law of thermodynamics.


PS. Awesome lolcat, SB. :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Synergy Blades on 2008-01-04 22:19:54
Btw, your argument about holes in evolution reminded me of this.

Theory: When I jump in the air, I float off into the sky.
Observation: I don't float off, I come back down to earth.

Because the atheist cannot prove beyond doubt that there is a force of gravity pulling me back down, God exists - and is pulling everyone down.  :?

Welcome to Intelligent Falling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_falling).  :-D



Thanks Jari, thought you might like it, you seem to be in a bit of a lolcat phase.  :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-04 22:59:37
[offtopic] Bring back the dog with the laser eyes![/offtopic]

Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-06 17:23:27
I just wanted to say, next time you want to put something in that was said by another person use the insert quote function^^
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: †Slash† on 2008-01-06 18:59:43
Religion, as a whole, attempts to justify who we are, what we are, and where we came from (much like science). However, unlike science, religion is a much more primitive way of thinking and simply falls short of providing viable answers to what humanity may or may not be.

Perhaps the greatest flaw of the human mind is its insatiable desire to discover its own origin, and to explain things around it. I'm sure, on more than one occasion, early man tried to explain his own surroundings, just as modern man does with religion and theories such as evolution. If a cave man goes to the river to get something to drink, and it starts to rain, he can scoop up water with his own hands and make it "rain", as well. He thinks "By Jove, I've got it! There must be someone like me, but bigger and immortal above me making it rain!". If there's a forest fire, early man can come to the conclusion that since he can make fire, there must be great gods in the skies making fire on a larger scale.

Religion generally offers a set of ideas; some good, some bad. Christianity, for example, teaches good virtue and morality. According to the Bible, you must live a somewhat Christ-like life to gain admittance into Heaven and become born again. This requires having faith in God and Christ without having any solid facts or clues that point to their existence, or proof of the validity of the Bible.

The Bible states that God is an all-powerful, all-loving, and all-merciful lord that created humanity as well as the world we live in. However, if he's so merciful, why is it if we don't follow his teachings, we are condemned to eternal suffering in the pits of a fiery Hell? Is God not just a tyrannical overlord that continuously bullies his subjects? Christians follow the Bible blindly. For example, Christians will praise God for saving one survivor in the infamous World Trade Center attack, yet not blame him for killing the other three thousand. If Hurricane Katrina spared a family's home, it's clearly by God's mercy and love, yet it's Satan that brought about the destruction and pain for the thousands of others.

Then there's the issue of proving whether or not God exists. "The Celestial Teapot" is an analogy written by Bertrand Russell, a philosopher, that helps show that it is entirely the Christian Church's responsibility to prove the existence of God and their Bible. Atheists and other non-believers should not have to prove why God doesn't exist or why the Bible is wrong.

Quote from: Bertrand Russell
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.

The reason organized religion merits outright hostility is that, unlike belief in Russell's teapot, religion is powerful, influential, tax-exempt and systematically passed on to children too young to defend themselves. Children are not compelled to spend their formative years memorizing loony books about teapots. Government-subsidized schools don't exclude children whose parents prefer the wrong shape of teapot. Teapot-believers don't stone teapot-unbelievers, teapot-apostates, teapot-heretics and teapot-blasphemers to death. Mothers don't warn their sons off marrying teapot-shiksas whose parents believe in three teapots rather than one. People who put the milk in first don't kneecap those who put the tea in first.

This applies to other parody-religions, as well. Who can say that the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist? How about the Invisible Pink Unicorn? Atheism has brought evolution and facts to the table, but what do Christians have to show? For that matter, what does any religion have to show? Certainly the Bible isn't based on fiction alone. I'm not trying to say that none of it is true. I'm sure some parts were based on actual events, places, or people. However, as far as "God" goes, I see no evidence, facts, or proof of his existence.

This post is intended to show my view on religion, not attack Christianity, or any other religion. I use Christianity as an example, because it's probably the religion most are familiar with. I have nothing against Christians, or other religious orientations.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-06 20:21:33
Quote
The Bible states that God is an all-powerful, all-loving, and all-merciful lord that created humanity as well as the world we live in. However, if he's so merciful, why is it if we don't follow his teachings, we are condemned to eternal suffering in the pits of a fiery Hell? Is God not just a tyrannical overlord that continuously bullies his subjects? Christians follow the Bible blindly. For example, Christians will praise God for saving one survivor in the infamous World Trade Center attack, yet not blame him for killing the other three thousand. If Hurricane Katrina spared a family's home, it's clearly by God's mercy and love, yet it's Satan that brought about the destruction and pain for the thousands of others.

Just to clear some things up, being merciful doesn't mean allowing no bad or evil to happen.  It means showing mercy.. showing forgiveness or sympathy.  If you seek forgiveness and accept Jesus as being God's son, all you need do is ask for his mercy/forgiveness and there you go, you are forgiven just like that.  Christians also believe God gave people free will, which means assholes will be assholes and fly planes into buildings and God won't necessarily interfere.

Also you must lose something (or never have had it) in order to be grateful for it.  If God only allowed good things to happen at all times, there would be no appreciation of said good things.  And sometimes humanity needs the tragedies to realize what we have.  Unfortunately it seems the tragedies are what brings out the best in people.

Perhaps God doesn't exist and everything in the universe just happened by off chance.  If anyone can quickly sum up the facts evolution has brought to the table I would sincerely like to hear them.  I know evolution does happen, such as humans slowly losing wisdom teeth and animals adapting to their environment, but I still haven't seen a fish become reptile.  If it's survival of the fittest... wouldn't only humans and a few select other species still be around, or at least still evolving?  If anyone can enlighten me, I'd like to know more.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: †Slash† on 2008-01-06 21:24:54
I am by no means an expert on evolution or creationism, but I think that many people undermine the concept of evolution.

When people say evolution happened by "chance", that's only half true. Yes, it was chance that organisms appeared in different types of environments, but it is not by chance they evolved the way they did. People sometimes ask me "Well, how can everything be so perfect and symmetrical if evolution was so random?". Well, if you look at the situation from a logical perspective, would it make sense if things were not symmetrical? Could you imagine the instability of having only one leg in the center of your body? Could you imagine the limited eye-sight of only one eye in the center of your head? Symmetric anatomy is a cornerstone of adaptation and fitness in the environment.

Organisms evolved the way they did to adapt to their environments and survive accordingly. If, for some reason, an animal's prey moves out of the animal's ecosystem (be it weather or environmental changes that forces it to move), the animals that follow the prey will be the ones that survive. If their prey happened to move to a desert environment from a swamp-like environment (unlikely, but plausible), the animals best fit for that environment would flourish.

For example,  these Ibex: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Ibexes.jpg (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Ibexes.jpg) (image courtesy of Wikipedia).

Those Ibex are virtually invisible in their environment. Naturally, if they were in a forested area, their brown color would stick out like a sore thumb. Say that this animal's ancestor had a dark brown and black embossed coating to fit in with a forested area, but they had to migrate to a desert environment in search of food. Naturally, the animals with the light-brown coat traits would be harder to see and would thrive, while the Ibex whose coat was dark brown would stand out easier to predators. Prime example of survival of the fittest.

.... And honestly,... Can you tell me you don't see an uncanny resemblance to humans when you look at most apes? In my opinion, apes are living proof that evolution happens, and it's not simply "chance" that we evolve the way we do. Suppose again, for some reason, that chimps, orangutans, or whatever were forced to leave the trees and live on the land due to environmental disaster or lack of a food source. If these apes had to evolve to fit a land environment, they would need to adapt. Naturally, their feet would have to become more apt for running,... Just like a man's. They'd need to become lean and swift, rather than bulky. But most of all, the apes would have to rely on their mind in this new environment, which I think is how humans came to be. There is a lot more information that this Wikipedia article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_ancestor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_ancestor) could tell you than I could ever try to explain. But, if you look at the skulls of pre-homo sapiens you probably couldn't tell much of a difference from chimp skulls.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-06 21:39:42
I understand species evolving to better adapt much like the Ibex picture you posted.  I don't understand why we no longer see half man half apes.  If this happened at one time because apes needed to adapt, why do apes no longer need to become humans?  If the evolution of all beings came from a single celled organism, shouldn't all the "in between" species that attempted to evolve still exist and be happening? http://www.alistreview.com/uploads/evolution.jpg (http://www.alistreview.com/uploads/evolution.jpg).   There is indeed evidence of beings existing that resemble both humans and apes, but why are they no longer around.  If evolving doesn't happen instantaneously there would have to have been a lot of neanderthals to carry on their species. Yet only the beginning neanderthal's (apes) and end neanderthals (humans) were fit enough to survive?

That seems to contradict the entire purpose behind evolution. 

Lol, maybe I should find a board based on evolution vs. creationism to get answers.  I don't think a final fantasy board is going to be too much help haha  :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: †Slash† on 2008-01-06 21:51:30
As far as I know, there's no universal conclusion as to the disappearance of pre-homo sapiens, but the general consensus, last I checked, was that homo sapiens eventually replaced the other homo species by using all the food and environmental sources by using their more capable minds. It pretty much falls in with the original "survival of the fittest" argument, supposing that the other species could not compete with modern humans due to their inferior intellect.

Apes don't continue to evolve because they're not forced to. They're perfectly suited for their habitats and don't need to evolve. Something has to happen to cause a species to adapt; some kind of environmental change or supply change. So, if the apes of today aren't forced to move out of their environments as a whole, then why would they need to evolve?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-06 22:01:53
I'm not sure I follow why only the pre-homo sapiens would then go extinct and not other animals as well.

I can understand with our rapid overtaking of the Earth species are not having enough time to adapt and evolve to these conditions we are forcing them to live in, but are there any facts on what caused apes to adapt on a massive scale like that?  Why were fish forced to evolve into reptiles and/or mammals?  Or vice versa?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: †Slash† on 2008-01-06 22:57:48
Well, the homo sapiens were in direct competition with the other homo species, unlike other animals. As shown by the food chain, there are always less predators than there are prey. In this case, there's less of the homo genus than what they're preying on. However, this doesn't mean there was enough food to go around for everyone. They had to work to get their food, and it just happened that the homo sapiens were the best at doing just that.

To be honest, I'm not sure that apes went through the evolution cycle on a massive scale. There are many possible ways that the evolution could have taken place, whether it be a few apes that were forced to evolve, or many. I'm just not sure on that one, I guess I'll look it up whenever.

Now, as far as the evolutionary cycle from water to land, I think the most popular theory is that fish used fins to move in mud and murky water. Fish that had larger and more dynamic fins were more successful swimmers, thus more successful in getting food. The trait for fins was naturally passed down through the fish that lived to breed, hence natural selection. The fins would continue to develop through the generations until there were legs.

That's about all I know on the subject without looking too far into it.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-07 12:29:35
Very interesting facts, though we know all of them(I mean that we evolved out of apes), we still oversee some aftermaths.(I mean that I know THAT we evolved out of apes but I never questioned WHY, although I know that organisms adapt on their environment).
Good that Slash posted it so nice :-D
And if we connect evolution to Christianity, we see that their theory of only humans having a soul is complete nonsense. We evolved out of animals, so they must have a soul too. Animals evolved out of blue-green algae, which are cyanobacteria and which cant be larger than a few micrometer. We see that even such little bacteria must have a soul, so everything that "lives" should contain a soul: humans, animals, plants....The "Lifestream" flows everywhere^^ :-)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-01-10 06:16:50
I just wanted to say, next time you want to put something in that was said by another person use the insert quote function^^

I hope that wasn't pointed at me seeing as I clearly spelt "offtopic" not "quote".

I do know how BB code works.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-01-12 09:47:26
No it was pointed at Freman, the cool newbie.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-01-14 12:53:46
[somewhat off-topic]
A slightly related, and very, very hilarious link (http://209.85.165.104/search?hl=en&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.fstdt.com%2Ffundies%2Ftop100.aspx%3Farchive%3D1&btnG=Search) that a friend sent me.

I figured that some of you might enjoy it.  :-D
[/somewhat off-topic]
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-01-14 15:12:28
Lol, I've only read a little bit but those quotes are hilarious...and sad at the same time.  I refuse to believe people can be that ignorant and close-minded.  Please tell me at least some of them are made up....please.  There's even one guy saying we should revert back to having slavery.     

Sigh :|
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: yoshi314 on 2008-01-14 15:55:29
oh man these quotes are an overkill :]

let's hope these fools will become extinct one day :]
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Olie on 2008-01-17 09:44:30
Btw, your argument about holes in evolution reminded me of this.

Theory: When I jump in the air, I float off into the sky.
Observation: I don't float off, I come back down to earth.

Because the atheist cannot prove beyond doubt that there is a force of gravity pulling me back down, God exists - and is pulling everyone down.  :?

Welcome to Intelligent Falling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_falling).  :-D



Thanks Jari, thought you might like it, you seem to be in a bit of a lolcat phase.  :-D


0wned
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: gjoerulv on 2008-02-11 11:53:36
I'm a christian. Please don't hate me lol. I drink, curse, have casual sex, but I don't smoke (used to he, he). I believe everyone is evolving their own "truths" in life based on what they experience. And the more fed up on it we become, the harder it is to change our minds. And it is our "truths" that separate us and creates hatred and love for each other. We fear the unknown, but at the same time struggle to adjust. Mankind surely is a paradox. The hatred/disrespect for other's "truths" will always exists, 'cause there is only one truth. Your own. Amen lol!
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Destiny on 2008-04-11 22:13:45
Believe in science progression, and think about what happens tomorrow. Religion or not, we must find the way that guide us to better life. Religion is just an istitution, but all must respect what other thinks and no excuse.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Master Ridley on 2008-04-12 07:03:40
'cause there is only one truth. Your own. Amen lol!

Philosophy…but untrue. There is but one ultimate truth, however, this ultimate truth may not be in the mind of some as they may be ignorant to it. Most can only believe what they believe to be true but odds are, they don't know the ultimate truth. Odds are, no human know and never will know. Human existence will end before that time comes. Humans only have approximately 126,000 years before their next known evolutionary accent.

Now, maybe the Planet does have a Spirit and without the Spirit, the planet dies.  Maybe, when people die, their spirits return to the planet unless they are too stubborn and stay as ghosts, which doesn't last forever.

It's been scientifically proven that the Earth will die of natural causes in about 4 billion years, one billion years before the sun turns Giant and melts the Earth to nothingness. How will it die of natural causes you ask? The tectonic plates, that so graciously generate it's magnetic field, will cease movement, the Earth's core with cool and the Earth with become barren, cold and dead, like Mars (yes, Mars is a dead planet). It may even shrink a little! With it, all life on Earth will die…

…this is assuming Earth lives to see a natural death of course

It also has been scientifically proven the a spirit is actually a person's magnetic field. When a person dies, they no longer provide a magnetic field, however, their magnetic field can still exist in a separate form, a ghost, which are conscious mind you. Ghosts connect themselves to objects when the magnetic field of the individual's or individuals' magnetic fields were strongest at the time, however, exist in loops, reliving a certain time over and over again. It's also possible for one ghost to show multiple images of others, even if those others are still alive. An Example of this would be if a serial killer murders someone. That someone, if the even was 'recorded' by the magnetic field of the victim, could create and image of the serial killer in the event loop, while the serial killer is still alive.

Destroying what the ghosts have attached to with cause them to go away in some cases, however, ghosts can not haunt forever as the Earth's Magnetic Field with eventually absorb it though it depends on the magnetic field of the individual.

Spirits are not to be confused with souls as they are not the same. A soul is your essence and heart, while your spirit is your "bio" energy or as I've been saying your Magnetic Field.

Unfortunately, Souls have not been Scientifically proven yet though some believe that The Brain is just the controller for your soul to control the body though not perfectly as some information doesn't get through cause the Brain doesn't comprehend all the commands the Soul has given it though a body can function fine without a soul though can't function without a spirit.

Well, you can either take this as truth or as BS as that's entirely up to you but I see there may be some truth in this, however, does that mean the existence of a Life-stream? Maybe! An existence of God? Don't know though if there were a divine being, I believe there would me multiple Gods or just powerful creatures/aliens claiming to be Gods, all of which were born within the Universe, not the creators of the Universe which I doubt there was any life that can defy the laws of physics.

I also believe that Religion has become obsolete and eventually, religion will be abandoned in the future though that may be wishful thinking. Some of Shaman-ism being an exception as I've seen truth in it.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-12 08:16:42
I really hope I don't get flamed for this, but, why is there a conversation about religion happening on qhimm?

Couldn't people simply state whether or not they agree with the black caped man's belief, or if they disagree, instead of rejecting other people's faiths to get there point across?

I myself have no faith, but the life stream idea is as valid as christianity.
That's all I'm saying, and from what I've read on this topic so far, I apologise in advance if saying it may be a valid theory offends anyone. :-)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-12 08:39:54
It's been scientifically proven that the Earth will die of natural causes in about 4 billion years, one billion years before the sun turns Giant and melts the Earth to nothingness.

O RLY? Link to this scientific proof, please.


How will it die of natural causes you ask? The tectonic plates, that so graciously generate it's magnetic field,

No they don't. Currently it's thought that the liquid outer core generates the magnetic field. Unless you have some new evidence for us?


will cease movement, the Earth's core with cool and the Earth with become barren, cold and dead, like Mars (yes, Mars is a dead planet). It may even shrink a little! With it, all life on Earth will die…

I'm not sure whether you have noticed, but currently it's widely thought that Mars is not within the habitable zone in our solar system, which might have a teeny weeny bit more to do with Mars having no life, than the fact that it does not have a decent magnetic field (or especially the fact that its core is not producing heat).

Also, Earth's core cooling has next to nothing to do with Earth becoming cold. Compared to heat from solar radiation, heat from Earth's core is thought to be rather negligible. Unless again, you have proof of the opposite?


It also has been scientifically proven the a spirit is actually a person's magnetic field.

Well, sh*t. Link please.

Spewing nonsense is one thing, claiming it as 'scientifically proven' is just f***ing stupid.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-04-13 11:31:41
If its really possible to predict Earth's demise then we'll all be gone in 19 years folks:

I was watching the news the other day and they had a story on how in the year 2027 there will be a meteor which will circle around the earth and create 100ft tidal waves around the world. I think we once had a meteor engraving with an aperture of 50m or so and it destroyed everything in a radius of 500km I think. This meteor has a size thats comparable to New York, meaning if it pursues there will be nothing left. Even if it misses, after another 7 years the same meteor will be sucked in by the suns gravitational force and circle back around and come by earth again. So bye-bye world.........
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Thanakil on 2008-04-13 12:19:13
It's not like humans won't do anything to stop that from happening tho (if it's even REAL, and not just a exaggeration...).

You know, we'll send Bruce Willis or something... :roll:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-13 13:08:59
I was watching the news the other day and they had a story on how in the year 2027 there will be a meteor which will circle around the earth and create 100ft tidal waves around the world. I think we once had a meteor engraving with an aperture of 50m or so and it destroyed everything in a radius of 500km I think. This meteor has a size thats comparable to New York, meaning if it pursues there will be nothing left. Even if it misses, after another 7 years the same meteor will be sucked in by the suns gravitational force and circle back around and come by earth again. So bye-bye world.........

Oh man.

Why don't people ever check up whether these interesting news reports have any truth in any them?

No, 1999 AN 10 will not "circle" earth, just pass it. No, 1999 AN 10 most certainly will not create tidal waves of 100 millimeters,  much less 100ft. Why? Because it's about 800-1800 meters in diameter, and more importantly has very little mass, if compared to say... moon, for example. It has a tiny chance of getting caught in Earth's gravity in a way that would make it hit on its next pass. In 2039. Which, by the way, is 12 years after the 2027 pass. NASA estimates that the chance is now 1 in 10 million. So, I guess it's like Dirty Harry would say; "Do you feel lucky, punk?".

And gee, what I just typed has been known since 1999. So it's not exactly hard to check using the mysterious Google.

EDIT: AND IT BLOODY WELL IS NOT COMPARABLE TO NEW YORK IN SIZE, UNLESS SOMEONE HAS RECENTLY SHRUNK NEW YORK.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-04-14 01:47:43
I have nothing to contribute to this conversation other than to say that World War III will effectively take care of plenty of the lives on Earth,  so why don't we just wait until after that happens and then discuss how the rest of us will die.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-04-16 14:39:46
Quote
No, 1999 AN 10 will not "circle" earth, just pass it. No, 1999 AN 10 most certainly will not create tidal waves of 100 millimeters,  much less 100ft. Why? Because it's about 800-1800 meters in diameter, and more importantly has very little mass, if compared to say... moon, for example. It has a tiny chance of getting caught in Earth's gravity in a way that would make it hit on its next pass.

Ever heard of Chaos Theory? Shortcut: Tiny little mistakes in calculations cause BIG DIFFERENCES. Wanna say, if our scientists just accidentally switch 2 decimal places during transcription or something then the comet could easily hit earth instead of just passing by. (If you wanna check my facts then check wikipedia->Chaos Theory or Butterfly effect)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-04-18 08:36:02
The guy who came up with the chaos theory died the other day [/end fun fact] lol.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-18 22:09:57
i don't normally do this with religious topics but i'll go ahead and throw in my two cents worth anyway. I am a christian and i believe in god based on what i know and what i have seen and there isn't anything that can change that so don't challange my belief (just in case somebody wants to bash me)

 now first off i will point this out to athiests or any other people who don't believe in life after death: if you don't beleive in god then that's perfectly fine with me, but i ask you not to look down on christians or any other type of religion because the teachings of christianity is to love and respect all and that makes life a much better place, as where without it there would probably be alot more choas,killing,theivery and cause more pain to us in our lives.

 as for the meteor the size of new york i wouldn't worry about it because with the technology we have we could easily blow something that size to pieces (yes i have thought about debre and we can take care of that as well) i don't believe in the choas theory so much but i won't call anyone out on that either.

 anyway back to my main point is that christianity teaches people to be kind, love, and respect each other and it would be cruel to insult and challenge people for choosing to believe them for it. and THAT is xelane's two cents...or rather xelane's 10$ dollar bill
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-18 22:53:41
May I bash you based on your lack of paragraphs and capitalization, though?

Because your post is quite unreadable as is.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-19 01:04:28
May i bash you because your a complete jackass? Seriously if you want a decent response from me then don't act like you want to start an arguement, otherwise i won't respond with what you're trying to get which in this case would be to fix my post

Learn how to talk to people (I can assume that you're going to post something after me but if you want a proper response then you better have a nicer attitude)

also i never did comment on the real issue of this topic. Black-Caped Man the religion that you follow/abide by closely resembles Buddahism (sorry if i spelt it wrong) but I see your point that it is slightly different since you would allegedly come back as a Human instead of an animal and i personaly don't believe in what you do but I will be more open to it than alot of other people will.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 08:44:59
May i bash you because your a complete jackass? Seriously if you want a decent response from me then don't act like you want to start an arguement, otherwise i won't respond with what you're trying to get which in this case would be to fix my post

You assume a lot. I'm entirely happy making you look like an idiot and mocking you, instead.

See, I'm a firm believer in negative enforcement, I have used it for a long time, and with good results. You might have known that, if you bothered to find out exactly who you started to argue with. But that's probably too much to ask, if you can't manage caps and paragraphs. :-D


Learn how to talk to people (I can assume that you're going to post something after me but if you want a proper response then you better have a nicer attitude)

:-D

You seem to think that I treat idiots as people, or respect their opinion. You are wrong.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 14:12:06
Talk of religion.
It always ends in arguments.
 :|
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-04-19 15:42:13
Quote
I am a christian and i believe in god based on what i know and what i have seen and there isn't anything that can change that so don't challange my belief (just in case somebody wants to bash me) now first off i will point this out to athiests or any other people who don't believe in life after death: if you don't beleive in god then that's perfectly fine with me, but i ask you not to look down on christians or any other type of religion

As I wrote earlier in this thread I dont look down on other religions as long as they do not dislike my own and as long as they have any traceability for me(well I could challenge your belief and come up with tons of arguements but first Im not sure if I could change your mind, second Im not interested in changing your mind since I do not know you and third Im far too tired to write that much :-D)

Quote
Black-Caped Man the religion that you follow/abide by closely resembles Buddahism (sorry if i spelt it wrong) but I see your point that it is slightly different since you would allegedly come back as a Human instead of an animal and i personaly don't believe in what you do but I will be more open to it than alot of other people will.

Well with the difference that I dont believe in Buddha's holiness^^(yeah I know that Buddha always mentioned that he is no divine being or god but the Buddhist treat him like one) but yeah you are right it shows some signs of it. (Actually there are more differences like I dont believe in the 4 noble truths or the octuple path or like the Buddhists dont believe in the Lifestream and much more but as I said Im tired of writing^^)

Oh yeah and whats that stupid discussion of El Bandito and Xelane about? pls calm down people and stop insulting others
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 16:15:01
Oh yeah and whats that stupid discussion of El Bandito and Xelane about? pls calm down people and stop insulting others

Negative reinforcement, buddy. Feel free to take the issue to mods or admins, if it bothers you.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 16:46:15
With all dues, this is a generally nice forum from what I've seen so far.  I personally don't bieleve that it's the place for religious arguments.
The Black Caped Man simply wanted to knw about others beliefs, I highly doubt he wanted it to turn into a scorching contest about people's different bielefs, and why one is better than the other.

The Lifestream belief he holds, while maybe being odd to some, is undoubtadly been picked up by so many others, I ask you, respectfully, I intend no offence to anyone here, but why are people arguing about religions instead of discussing the topic, the Lifestream belief.

I mean, seriously, what difference is there to somebody beileving in Christianity, Catholocism, Bhuddism, Atheism, The Lifestream, or the people who put there religion on forms as being Jedi.  What's the need in the hatefull comments some people throw about?

Personally, by the way, I'm an Atheist, but I don't make fun or insult anyone in any of the categorys above.  I accept them for being people, not part of a religion I don't believe in.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-19 18:57:36
Black-Caped Man i know that there are probably alot more differences between Buddahism and what ever you name what you believe (i haven't heard a name for it yet) but i was just saying that the only pre-exsisting religion that could be compared to is Buddahism unless there is another religion that i'm not taking into account

EL Ammo: you refer to me as an idiot which could probably show what kind of person you are, especialy since you get enjoyment out of mocking people (tsk tsk) and you also like to assume that I am an idiot. The ONLY thing that you can insult me for is my lack of evidence

Also i'll admit that i should have put caps and paragraphs but you could've gotten the same results without the negativity so don't think that you should try your "negative reinforcement" when i am one who does not respond well to negativity.

And finally, why would you assume that I am an idiot to be mocked? I made 1 comment about what I believe in and you felt obligated to insult my typing instead of merely asking me to rewrite my post which could have ended alot better for the both of us and if you have nothing to say other than some kind of negative insult then don't bother saying it because I will no longer respond to random insults
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 19:51:46
The ONLY thing that you can insult me for is my lack of evidence

You think? Try this on for a size; you are a butthurt christfag. Want more?

Trust me, I can insult you for lots of things, and you trying to tell me what I can or can't do doesn't make it any harder for me.


Also i'll admit that i should have put caps and paragraphs but you could've gotten the same results without the negativity so don't think that you should try your "negative reinforcement" when i am one who does not respond well to negativity.

Mysteriously enough you seem to have learned both capitalization and using paragraphs in amazingly short span of time. It would seem that you indeed respond quite as expected to negative reinforcement. :)

You can keep telling yourself that you would have done this or that if sky was green and water was dry, but the fact is that it worked, just like it has worked every time. Period. You just chose to make an ass out of yourself during the process, but hey, that's your problem.


And finally, why would you assume that I am an idiot to be mocked?

Because you either are incapable of basic English language skills, you think that people will read a mass of jumbled up text just because they want to learn your glorious insights, or you are just too lazy.

In any of those cases you are an idiot, I don't even have to assume anything.


I made 1 comment about what I believe in and you felt obligated to insult my typing instead of merely asking me to rewrite my post which could have ended alot better for the both of us and if you have nothing to say other than some kind of negative insult then don't bother saying it because I will no longer respond to random insults

Awww, did I hurt your feelings. Poor thing. :D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Ragna on 2008-04-19 20:08:33
Excuse me, funny-cute-cat, but this (http://forums.qhimm.com/index.php?board=7.0) may be your forum.

Also: don't you know about respect?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 20:15:13
I know, there's no need to insult people just to get a point across, just use reasoning and chances are, people respond well to it.
Getting people wound up to get a response is just a childish way to do things, and I personally don't think it has a place here.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 20:55:12
LOL  :-D

Tidus_Lionheart & Henkäys Ikuisuudesta: Do you know who I am? Do you know that I have been here since 2000 and moderated on more than one occasion?

Perhaps... just perhaps I know about these things? Maybe even bit more than you do?

Did you think that I was pulling his leg when I said that negative reinforcement works?


EDIT: So, come back to complain in about... 2014 - 2016, preferably after you have moderated here for few years, ok?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 21:01:15
As I said, I don't wanna offend anyone, just throwing in my oppinion as everyone else does.
The point of a forum I believe :-)
I don't really care if you've been here since 1927, are a moderator now, or invented the wheel.
Point is, if I want to express my oppinion, I will.

If you're negative reinforcment works, that's fine by me.  I'm just saying, that it's not a method I would use is all.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Ragna on 2008-04-19 21:05:07
Of course I know who you are and what you've done here, pal.
But also, I don't even care who you are. Just respect other people opinions.

P.S.: We are now in off-topic... don't you see?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 21:08:16
so youd prefer if everyone typed like this then

EDIT: Face it, asking nicely doesn't work. No matter what they'd say afterwards. And if you want negative reinforcement to work - like it did here - you are not going to start by respecting idiots.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 21:10:01
so youd prefer if everyone typed like this then

What, if anything does that have to do with the "discussion" we were having?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 21:11:23
Gee, I dunno.

Want to buy a vowel?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 21:26:28
Gimme an A please :-)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-19 21:35:13
By defending the numbskulls who can't - or more likely won't (which might be worse, I suppose - that if anything shows a complete lack of respect towards the people you expect to read your posts) - type something even remotely resembling English you are unfortunately encouraging them.

I do not particularly care what you - or anyone else here - thinks of me, nor do I care if you want to stand up for someone, but in cases like these you are just encouraging them.

And no - before someone suggests it again - asking nicely doesn't work.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-19 21:40:57
Well, I'm not defending anyone, I'm not trying to get you to be nice to people.
Some people need to be spoken to bluntly to get points across, I get that.  All I'm saying is, it's not my way.
So, would it be out of the question, if I said can we start over here, before this thing turns bitter?
I don't mind having people not like me either to be honest, but I've seen alot of you're posts before and they are rather helpfull, so I would prefer to keep you on the good side as it were.
If not, no worries, I accept that some people are stubborn. :-P Joking.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-19 22:39:39
okay, obviously you didn't read what i said about your "negative reinforcement" and that was that if you had done it in a more positive matter it would have gotten THE SAME RESULT. If you didn't understand that it meant that it meant that i would have changed my typing either way

And by the way the reason that your "negative reinforcement" worked was only because you showed me that my typing needed to be changed to be legible to others and that would have worked much better if you were to say it in a positive fashion. I already knew how to use caps and paragraphs btw, nothing new was learned, just enforced

Also, you cannot just assume that asking nicely won't change anything. Most of the people whom I ask nicely change their attitude UNLESS they are those certain people who are just cruel for no reason. Also, I have edited my first post so that it is easier to read

I would also like to thank tidus Lionheart for respectfully showing their opinions while some people who shall not by named continue their rampage
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-04-19 23:15:09
Jari please come back, the amount of nooblets on the forums with endless amounts of questions is making me visit the forum less and less frequently. At least when you "modded" we didn't have the ridiculous amount of post spammers we have now.

I do think you get way to much enjoyment out of picking on relgious types though, (however amusing it might be on my end lol).

I've only really flicked over the argument but my guess is, like most arguments I've seen with him, Jar.. I mean El ammo is pointing out the fact that his negative opinion is as important as your  positive opinion, and as long as you keep pointing out that "thats your opinion" hes gonna keep voicing it.

You could try being a bit nicer at first though, you tend to give them like 1 or 2 posts before you start abusing the shit out of them. Although I spoze in this instance you seem to be holding back somewhat. Lets just all relax have a cup of tea and eat some cake.

(why is this thread still alive btw, i thought it died ages ago.)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-20 02:00:01
Well first off i would like to thank squeeble for agreeing with EL but at the same time didn't choose a side. But as for negative comments being more influencial than positive ones i'm pretty skeptical because i've never delt with a situation where those kinds of results occured.

Also since I have only seen el ammo on this topic I can only say that he is a very negative, and in a sense, evil person who takes joy in insulting and mocking others. however that may only be the case on this topic I honestly can't say.

Anyway what I am trying to say is that El ammo should try to give at least a little more respect and assuming that he doesn't make that into an insult, it may give him a more likeable person
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-20 08:42:17
okay, obviously you didn't read what i said about your "negative reinforcement" and that was that if you had done it in a more positive matter it would have gotten THE SAME RESULT. If you didn't understand that it meant that it meant that i would have changed my typing either way


Obviously I did. Pardon me, but I didn't believe a word of it, and don't believe a word of it now.

Dude, I've been here for eight years. You ain't the first one and won't be the last one who claims that they are special and they should be asked nicely because that would work... probably just because they are made fluffy teddy bears and pretty flowers. It has not worked. Not once. It has been tried. It has been tried with people who later - when the going really got rough after being nice didn't work - said the same thing you do now. Only problem was that it had already been tried with them and they just chose to "forget" it.

There's a minuscule chance that you'd be the first person ever who would have done what he says... but... nah. You are lying.

Maybe you need a lesson; people are not going to take what you say at face value. Especially when they have years of experience that says you are just bullshitting them. They are not going to take it at face value no matter how many times you keep repeating it.


And by the way the reason that your "negative reinforcement" worked was only because you showed me that my typing needed to be changed to be legible to others and that would have worked much better if you were to say it in a positive fashion. I already knew how to use caps and paragraphs btw, nothing new was learned, just enforced

Bullshit. You obviusly are smart enough to type, so you knew full well all this time that your post was unreadable, no need for me to point anything out. You just thought that you'd get away with it. I only gave you a kick on the arse to make you do something about it.

BTW, feel free to put negative reinforcement into as many quotation marks as you'd like, but it is very real (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_reinforcement).


Also, you cannot just assume that asking nicely won't change anything.

Yes I can. I have eight years of experience of it. BTW, your real world example doesn't apply here; this is the Intertubes. It makes idiots out of people when it gives them anonymity.


Jari please come back, the amount of nooblets on the forums with endless amounts of questions is making me visit the forum less and less frequently. At least when you "modded" we didn't have the ridiculous amount of post spammers we have now.

Awww, sorry. Can't do that.


I do think you get way to much enjoyment out of picking on relgious types though, (however amusing it might be on my end lol).

Yeah, but I only pick on the obnoxious ones. :-D


Also since I have only seen el ammo on this topic I can only say that he is a very negative, and in a sense, evil person who takes joy in insulting and mocking others.

(http://borgborg.org/collegehumor.jpg)

BTW, I don't want you to be more likable. Only thing I'm concerned about is whether we can actually decrypt your posts.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-04-20 11:12:03
Also since I have only seen el ammo on this topic I can only say that he is a very negative, and in a sense, evil person who takes joy in insulting and mocking others. however that may only be the case on this topic I honestly can't say.

Hey I've only been here a year and you could consider him being "nice" on this topic.
Jari please come back, the amount of nooblets on the forums with endless amounts of questions is making me visit the forum less and less frequently. At least when you "modded" we didn't have the ridiculous amount of post spammers we have now.
Awww, sorry. Can't do that.
I'm quite curious as to why?
Was it something I missed, or just forgot about.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-20 17:32:46
Nah, there never has been a public discussion about it. It's not a big deal, just several smaller ones, really. Like me not having so much time for it, anymore.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-20 20:26:14
ok obviously there is no reasoning here since you just assume this and that about everybody, that is pretty sad that you judge people so quickly and such an irrashional manner and I hope I don't run into you anywhere else because you are a VERY serious negative influence even if you are technicly holding back.

Do not assume anything about me just based on one blur of unreadable text which btw I fixed yesterday to be readable. The fact of the matter is that being positive ALWAYS works with me and I am aware that there is a possibility that I could be lying but you really should have given me at least one shot at it before you decided to start bashing me.


"There's a minuscule chance that you'd be the first person ever who would have done what he says... but... nah. You are lying."

Hey thanks for assuming that you know me. If you know so much about me then you would probably know my favorite color wouldn't you? And if you don't know what i'm talking about it's the fact that you immediatly assumed that I was lying after only seeing about 5 posts which only tells you SOME thing about me. Do not EVER tell me that I am lying without actually knowing me unless I say something like "I was invited to santa's christmas party and played cards with the Easter Bunny" because I can do the exact same thing to you.

and that whole thing about positive reinforcement not working.....yeah you're full of crap because most of the time when I use it, it works FLAWLESSLY for me. maybe it hasn't worked for YOU but that does NOT mean that it doesn't work so don't come B****ing to me that you have been trying for 8 years and have never gotten it to work once
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-20 21:09:30
Waaahhh! You hurt my feelings! Waaahhh! :lol:

Like I said, spend eight years here, moderate on more than one occasion... then and only then I will take your comments about what works and what doesn't with any degree of seriousness.

Meanwhile you can go cry to your momma, if that makes you feel better. You are not going to get any special treatment from me, just because you whine and bitch.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-20 22:28:12
you are pretty arrogant. and also you seem to think that you are GOOD at insulting people, "go cry to your mamma"? what kind of insult is that? are you some kind of gangsta imitation? that's pretty pathetic don't you think?

in any case you're starting to bore me cause you pretty much say the same things over and over again, constantly recycling your comments. And has anyone noticed that this topic has gone from asking if you think the same way that Black-Caped Man does or not to me argueing to some loser who likes to brag about his 8 years here and thinks that he knows what works best.

anyway like I said you're boring me so I probably won't see you again and that makes my day alot brighter so thanks for showing me how stupid some poeple can be when they think that they are superior to others which you CLEARLY aren't
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-20 22:40:22
Xelane, I wouldnt' waste anymore energy here man, it's clear this is never going to end well.
Just bypass this topic and go to somewhere your imput is appreciated instead of beat on :-)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-04-21 10:37:11
I think it's time to bring'er out again.

(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s280/squeeblish/retarded.jpg)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-21 14:33:40
you are pretty arrogant. and also you seem to think that you are GOOD at insulting people, "go cry to your mamma"? what kind of insult is that? are you some kind of gangsta imitation? that's pretty pathetic don't you think?

in any case you're starting to bore me cause you pretty much say the same things over and over again, constantly recycling your comments. And has anyone noticed that this topic has gone from asking if you think the same way that Black-Caped Man does or not to me argueing to some loser who likes to brag about his 8 years here and thinks that he knows what works best.

anyway like I said you're boring me so I probably won't see you again and that makes my day alot brighter so thanks for showing me how stupid some poeple can be when they think that they are superior to others which you CLEARLY aren't

(http://borgborg.org/funny-pictures-bored-cat.jpg)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-21 21:29:34
LOL to squeebles picture, that was pretty funny to see especially at the bottom where it says "a very special message from the JRR's shut the **** up foundation" XD
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-04-24 02:17:06
It's impossible to win an argument about religion, and it just makes you look like an idiot when you try. Sharing beliefs is fine and dandy. Attacking someone else's is just a waste of everyone's time. Millions have argued about it for thousands of years. You're not going to be the ultimate end to the debate on some online forum about RPGs. I haven't read the past couple pages of this topic, but I'm pretty sure I already know what it says because it's the same thing everything freaking time.

MASSIVE EDIT -
Haha wow. Maybe I SHOULD have read more instead of just skimmed. Then I probably would have realized the arguing is about respect instead of religion. Oh well, maybe someone will get a laugh out of my ignorance so I'll leave it up.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-24 04:42:09
Yea it was more about respect than religion but we did manage to throw a sprinkle of religion into the mix: I said that Black-Caped Man's belief was similar to buddhaism and EL Ammo.....called me a "butthurt christfag"......which i guess still counts :|
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: squeeble on 2008-04-24 08:31:53
I said that Black-Caped Man's belief was similar to buddhaism and EL Ammo.....called me a "butthurt christfag"......which i guess still counts :|
First time I've ever heard that one btw, it made me lol
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-04-25 06:24:45
I just find it funny that the discussion went from the lifestream to the chaos theory and "butthurt christfags". The fact I'm reading this with a Mickeys in hand just makes it worse.


Yes I am an alcoholic. No I don't care how you feel about it.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-25 14:37:50
What is so fulfilling about religion anyway?  Religious morals really are obsolete and ignorant.  Why can't humans live without religion, its like humans in modern times are bound to end up with a religion.  Are humans that weak? 
I'm a pantheist, not an atheist. (there is a difference)  I only became a pantheist after an event of an aesthetic experience, which religious people always seem to put under the rug no matter what kind of aesthetic experience it is.  Soon after, I found myself thinking differently, and later I discovered through my own logic and reasoning, that my morals were superior to those with a religion.  Why?  Because I never wanted to believe in a mystical adoration like God.  I now know from my previous experience of nature, that there are much more pleasant things in the Universe than a God.  I've never had the urge to hurt somebody, or lie to somebody, or to have ugly, pointless, uncontrollable sex.  I've never had the urge to do anything that humans have defined as being "terrible" because I believe in the universal nature around us, not a God.

NATURE AND SCIENCE RULE!  OR SHOULD NOW RULE!
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-04-25 16:04:44
[flame]   Who decided your morals are superior to someone elses?  You?  I thought so.   Just because the world has declared what is right and wrong doesn't necessarily make them that way.  Your belief that you have superior morals only shows how immature you are.  Just because you claim to leave a perfect and sinless life makes you a liar.  If you have never had the urge hurt someone then you are a pushover who will go nowhere in life,  if you've never lied then you need to realize your own denial,  if you've never had "ugly, pointless, uncontrollable sex" then you're probably still a teenager who wishes he/she would be noticed by the opposite (or same) sex.

Also, I'm pretty sure that Pantheism does involve the belief in God (or at least an eternal existence).  That's why it's not atheism.  [/flame]

P.S.  The majority of my beliefs lay in Pantheism.  And please try to refrain from getting "butthurt"; if you want a debate then let's have a calm and mature one.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-25 16:45:56
Well, I suppose if you'd have my mind, you would understand.  It is undeniable that religious people are quite violent.  Just examine the war that is going on today, it's all because of blind faith.  Hmmm..

1. i have no reason to use violence because there is such a thing as reasoning through language.
2. i have no reason to lie to anyone cause the world I know is awesome and real.
3. i'm sure teenagers crave sexual lust when they are about 13 or something, thinking about sex all the time instead of love will get you HIV, so yes I have discarded sex from my mind, and no i don't try to get attention sexually because I'll get HIV.
4. i don't use the ten commandments, my morals are setup much more different, sort of complex and confusing.
5. go read Dr. Dawkins book the "god delusion"
6. pantheism uses the term God as an entity of nature and the physical laws of science and not of an omnipotent being.
7. i'm pretty sure someone one could tell if I'm a good person or not, so far people I know, know that I am a good person, so that leads me to believe that I am a good person.
8. take it easy on me, i'm only 17. :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-25 18:48:34
3. i'm sure teenagers crave sexual lust when they are about 13 or something, thinking about sex all the time instead of love will get you HIV, so yes I have discarded sex from my mind, and no i don't try to get attention sexually because I'll get HIV.

While power of suggestion might indeed be great, I'm pretty sure that you are about as likely to get HIV from thinking about sex, as you are to get pregnant from thinking about sex. Hmmm... immaculate conception. Yummy.

They... uh... told you about condoms in school? Please say yes.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-25 19:05:23
Yes they told me about condoms in school, which is a terrible thing to say to a child or teenager.  You wanna know why??
Because it basically tell kids to go out and have sex with a condom so they can be safe.  Wearing a condom when you make pseudo love to your partner is basically telling them that you hate them and you don't want to raise a child together and live happily ever after.  Sure you would get some protection from HIV, but you would still get what I like to call "mental HIV"
Face it.  Sex is a psychological killer.  Humans have sex just to fulfill there needs that should not even exist, but memetically speaking they sadly do exist.  Humans use the acts of reproduction to have unnecessary sex, and they don't even make love to ensure the survival of the human species only as a responsible decision, people nowadays just do it non-stop; if you disagree then you must be a fool.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-25 19:24:49
Yes they told me about condoms in school, which is a terrible thing to say to a child or teenager.  You wanna know why??

Yes. Very terrible (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88144955). Because it would be so much nicer if all those teenagers who are busy hating each other getting some would just drop dead. Literally.


Because it basically tell kids to go out and have sex with a condom so they can be safe.  Wearing a condom when you make pseudo love to your partner is basically telling them that you hate them and you don't want to raise a child together and live happily ever after.  Sure you would get some protection from HIV, but you would still get what I like to call "mental HIV"

Darn it, you should only have sex to make babies, with someone you plan to spend the rest of your life with. Preferably in the dark, under covers and dressed.

Surely it can't be something that two people can enjoy together? Oh noes! Not at all! For it is handiwork of the Satan! Satan, I tell you!

...do I sound sufficiently Fred Phelps-like?


Face it.  Sex is a psychological killer.  Humans have sex just to fulfill there needs that should not even exist, but memetically speaking they sadly do exist.  Humans use the acts of reproduction to have unnecessary sex, and they don't even make love to ensure the survival of the human species only as a responsible decision, people nowadays just do it non-stop; if you disagree then you must be a fool.

Face it. Sex isn't evil just because you can't get any.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-25 20:09:20
Hah!!  Good!  I hate sex and the idea of sex!  When the time comes my child will be super awesome!
I wonder what your kid is gonna turn out like??
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-25 20:18:42
I'd settle for sane.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-25 20:29:20
Well I feel that obese went a little bit far with the flame but I will admit that he has alot of valid points. Also "it is undeniable that religous people are violent"....uhhh no they aren't, under most circumastances I have found that religous people avoid conflict all together but if they only SAY they believe in their religion then they probably won't follow it.

an example of this would be: a christian who claims to be religious but has casual sex when it is unholy to do so before marrige, as long as they are actually commited to the religion then there should not be any aggressive behavior in that person.

Also I wouldn't declare that "my morals are superior to others" because you are most likely lying or delluded into believing that and may also indicate that you have a very egotistical personality (emphasis on the word MAY). Also, just because you don't believe in religion and that it is holding humanity back doesn't mean that you are right, let people decide for themselves.

Lastly, I can't see why you would hate the idea of sex unless it was because you feel as if the opposite sex wouldn't like you. That was just a hypothosis by the way so let it be known that I am not saying that it is true. And your child will be like every other child in the world, nothing special.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-25 21:11:58
Its not that I don't feel that the opposite sex doesn't like, I just don't want to be an STD infected swinger.
My version or idea of "sex" is much much much MUCH more passionate to those of the people I know.  Many people I know have sex with their partners just to shut them up or avoid later confrontation of some simple minded obstacle in their lives.  Is that moral or love?  No.  From my point of view, sex has become immature and violent.  If you don't believe me, just look at the rape statistics.
  People act like they have to always insert their penises into a woman's flower of life everytime to make love; no!  Just holding your partner in your arms in your own skin and knowing in both of your minds that you care for each other is considered love making in my book.  Reproducing is just a responsible and adult decision in a couple's life.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-25 21:16:48
Oh yeah.  By the way.  I was just comparing my morals to some religious people I know or know of, not to every single person on the planet.  I'm obviously much cooler than Osama bin Laden or Saddam Huessen.  They can't even make their God appear to make them Final Fantasy VII mods!  hahahahaaa!!   
  Sorry if I offended anyone!!!!!!!!!!! :-D :-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-25 22:12:40
Good reply. In the last arguement I was just in every time I would say something, no matter what it was, the antagonist would always come back with an offensive remark that sometimes had no relevence. And to your newly revised morals to sex, I agree, sex has become much too casual especially among teens...it's shocking as well as sad. (hopefully I don't get a "you only say that cuz you can't get any" remark)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-26 05:46:00
Its not that I don't feel that the opposite sex doesn't like, I just don't want to be an STD infected swinger.
My version or idea of "sex" is much much much MUCH more passionate to those of the people I know.  Many people I know have sex with their partners just to shut them up or avoid later confrontation of some simple minded obstacle in their lives.  Is that moral or love?  No.  From my point of view, sex has become immature and violent.  If you don't believe me, just look at the rape statistics.

Shouldn't you... I dunno, have some sex in the first place, before you start making statements? You know, so that you'd know what you are talking about. Just consider it research, if you get moral obstacles otherwise.


People act like they have to always insert their penises into a woman's flower of life everytime to make love; no!  Just holding your partner in your arms in your own skin and knowing in both of your minds that you care for each other is considered love making in my book.  Reproducing is just a responsible and adult decision in a couple's life.

Oh! I almost forgot.

Top Ten Female sex fantasies (http://sonjaaa.livejournal.com/60207.html). Read it and weep.

Methinks that them girlies might want bit more than a hug occasionally.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-26 08:47:49
Uhh...El Ammo I wouldn't suggest telling people to go have sex, especially when they are pretty much against it in the first place. You don't even know how old he is and you're telling him to go have sex and THEN and ONLY then talk about how bad it is....that's pretty pointless and hypocritical for him don't you think?

As well as the fact that since we don't know what his age is, it is a possibility that you could be telling him to break the law (applies if he is under 18) and let's not forget that there is a risk to having sex. I won't say that it's bad but if you just randomly have it with people you barely know or don't care for then you're pretty much asking for alot of trouble.

 :evil:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: dziugo on 2008-04-26 09:50:45
I believe that Jari was just being sarcastic... And Dias Flac already said that he is 17, so I'm pretty sure that he is 17 today too.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-26 12:20:38
Uhh...El Ammo I wouldn't suggest telling people to go have sex, especially when they are pretty much against it in the first place. You don't even know how old he is and you're telling him to go have sex and THEN and ONLY then talk about how bad it is....that's pretty pointless and hypocritical for him don't you think?

Like dziugo said, he is 17. Unless he lied to us, of course. Old enough to have sex.

Am I suggesting that? Or am I questioning the validity of his claims, when he doesn't seem to have any idea what he is talking about?

Besides, he might even cheer up if he got some.


As well as the fact that since we don't know what his age is, it is a possibility that you could be telling him to break the law (applies if he is under 18) and let's not forget that there is a risk to having sex. I won't say that it's bad but if you just randomly have it with people you barely know or don't care for then you're pretty much asking for alot of trouble.

Doesn't apply where I live, doesn't apply in several (most?) US states, certainly doesn't apply in Spain for example... age of consent is actually under 18 in most countries. Perhaps you should read up (http://www.avert.org/aofconsent.htm), before you start making claims?

Pray tell, what risk this might be? Risk of getting beat up by an angry boyfriend? He should learn to run faster, in that case. Risk of discovering that sex might actually be fun and enjoyable? Ooohhhhh, that would be bad.


I believe that Jari was just being sarcastic...

Just a little bit.  :-D


EDIT: Oops, sorry dziugo. Your name is really hard to type. :-P
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-26 12:38:03

Pray tell, what risk this might be? Risk of getting beat up by an angry boyfriend? He should learn to run faster, in that case.


LOL :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-26 17:13:05
Yes I am 17, seriously, no joke, not even kidding, why would I lie about such a trivial thing???  I see what your trying to do El Ammo (let me reassure you that I'm not trying to be condescending about this) your trying to present me with random information to keep me from proving a point.  And my point is that MODERN sex is stupid.  Sex wouldn't have gotten to where its at now if so many people hadn't taken it the wrong way.  So many things have become so easy to identify as being sexual; like for instance, a woman in a tight leather, "skimpy" police uniform with 10 layers of makeup on her face can be defined as being lustful or sexual.  Is this a joke?  If its really true, it just shows how weak the human species is.  This type of attitude of finding a woman in a "skimpy" police uniform sexual, is just adding to our already unstable urges for sex.  These new developed urges created from stupidity, make sex so vile and disgusting.  I mean come on now, penis enlargement pills (if your partner really does love you, he\she would accept you no matter what)  and all these different sexual positions, like anal sex!!!!!  Seriously, do you really want faeces on your penis??? 

And that age of consent crap is just ludicrous.  And no, I don't need to have sex to find out if I would like it or not, because I already know that I don't like it.  Even if they do have protection, there still at risk, condoms can break ya know.  Did I mention the STD's?  Below 18....  I take it that none of you've seen a young pregnant teenager struggle psychological, financially, and physically with the burden of her child.  Your trying to intertwine morality with laws.  And be honest, some laws are really dumb, and the age of consent one is really dumb.  If any of you plan to have kids or already have kids, would you let them go out and have sex with a person they are supposedly in love with before there 18??  The perfect age of consent should really be somewhere in between 25 - 30.

Finally to the point that El Ammo made about womens sexual fantasies. 
Of course women have these sexual fantasies because their men or partners have already presented them with sex, so they are bound to end up thinking about doing more explicit things in sex.  They are trained by their partners to want more and more sex.  And there is always the possibility of their partner having sex with someone else, think of what that could lead to: STD's, rape, and possibly death!  Maybe men should actually try and do what I had said to do to make love, who knows it might be much more romantic and passionate, and you might learn something about your partner, rather than having your woman get penetrated by two different guys.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-04-26 17:37:35
I like sex.
My girlfriend wants it all the time.
I see no problem with this.
Sex = The shit.
No sex = Plain shit.
My point is, I like sex, I have sex lots, and I don't objectify people, and I have no worries about my girlfriend having sex with someone else, just because we have sex and don't "make love".
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-04-26 17:40:07
This really should be split into two topics, with this half going to Completely Unrelated.

Dias Flac, I completely understand what you're trying to say, and I agree it's almost disgusting that humans are hardwired to have sex a lot and then die as if that's our only purpose in life. But at the same time, I'm going to have to take a shot in the dark and guess you're a virgin, because it's pretty obvious you have no clue about pleasing a girl. Romance and passion, sure, but that's not enough. Does the term "g-spot" mean anything to you? Plus all girls are different. One might fantasize about banging you in the ass with a strap-on, another might be old fashioned and just want missionary, then another will be a dumbass that thinks she's in love just because you've got money in your wallet. And I dare say most girls, at least in my experience, confuse lust and love far too often. Being romantic and being too "soft" WILL push a lot of girls away.
Well, there's way too damn much to fill you in on. Find yourself a crazy chick without STDs who wants you to choke her out while you're going at it, ignore all thoughts that go like "I shouldn't do this", stop trying to suppress your instincts trying to go against nature, and then read what you just wrote and tell us you still agree. You're not going to.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Dias Flac on 2008-04-26 18:00:20
Uugh..  I've had enough of this.  Maybe I'm becoming so powerful that I'm taking a whole new route in evolution!!!!!!!!!
whoooooooohoooooooo!!!!!!
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-26 18:06:57
These new developed urges...

Yeah, right (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome).


...created from stupidity, make sex so vile and disgusting.  I mean come on now, penis enlargement pills (if your partner really does love you, he\she would accept you no matter what)  and all these different sexual positions, like anal sex!!!!!  Seriously, do you really want faeces on your penis???

Gee, I was under the impression that scat play and anal sex were two different things. If you really want to know, I'm not into scat (that being said; if someone else is... it's their business and their business only - I don't mind), but anal sex can be great and I find it particularly enjoyable if a girl massages my prostate while performing oral sex on me. And yes, you give a prostate massage by sticking your finger up someone's ass - because that's pretty much the only way to reach it.

Maybe you should try it, before you declare it evil.


And no, I don't need to have sex to find out if I would like it or not, because I already know that I don't like it.

:-D

...you are trolling, right? Have been since you started posting in this thread, I presume.


Even if they do have protection, there still at risk, condoms can break ya know.  Did I mention the STD's?  Below 18....  I take it that none of you've seen a young pregnant teenager struggle psychological, financially, and physically with the burden of her child.

Yes, condoms can break. Feel free to have sex without one, if you'd prefer. Also, you do not seem to understand that condoms (98% effective against unwanted pregnancy) can be used together with other methods of contraception, including morning after pills and even abortion.

Fact: one doesn't get pregnant in this day and age, unless one either wants to, or is extremely careless or stupid.

And finally; you assume too much. Details, however, are something I will not discuss here, or with you.


Your trying to intertwine morality with laws.  And be honest, some laws are really dumb, and the age of consent one is really dumb.  If any of you plan to have kids or already have kids, would you let them go out and have sex with a person they are supposedly in love with before there 18??

YES! HOLY f***ING YES! I WOULD LET THEM HAVE SEX EVEN WITH PERSON THEY ARE NOT IN LOVE WITH, IF THEY'D LIKE TO DO THAT!


The perfect age of consent should really be somewhere in between 25 - 30.

Preferably over 80. Would take care of the entire problem in one generation.


Finally to the point that El Ammo made about womens sexual fantasies. 
Of course women have these sexual fantasies because their men or partners have already presented them with sex, so they are bound to end up thinking about doing more explicit things in sex.  They are trained by their partners to want more and more sex.  And there is always the possibility of their partner having sex with someone else, think of what that could lead to: STD's, rape, and possibly death!  Maybe men should actually try and do what I had said to do to make love, who knows it might be much more romantic and passionate, and you might learn something about your partner, rather than having your woman get penetrated by two different guys.

Ooooookay. Yeah, that must be it. :-D


EDIT: Especially considering your email address... you are trolling. But you are fairly amusing troll, indeed. :-)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-04-26 18:09:38
Uugh..  I've had enough of this.  Maybe I'm becoming so powerful that I'm taking a whole new route in evolution!!!!!!!!!
whoooooooohoooooooo!!!!!!

Extinction is nothing new.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-04-26 18:19:22
....that was a VERY random comment you just made there...
El Ammo, I wasn't sure about his and that was why I tried to be so vague about it. And there are SOME states in the U.S that have that rule but he might not live there. And the way you said "maybe you should read up before you start making claims", first off I didn't make any claims I made a bunch of "what if" questions, if I claimed anything then I would have said something like:
"he's underage to have sex" but what I DID say was that it was a possibility that he is underage.

Secondly I don't like how you said it, even though I just explained how the whole "read up" thing didn't apply here it still makes it seem as though you treat everyone here with no respect except maybe squeeble, why squeeble? because the whole time you've been here he's the only one you didn't insult

And as for dias, the whole "trying to intertwine morality with law" thing: I was telling everyone here that El Ammo was telling you to go have sex when it may or may not be illegal and I think it should be noted that Law vs. morality is YOUR DECISION no-one else's
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-04-26 18:23:35
Secondly I don't like how you said it...

That's too bad, isn't it? :-D
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: obesebear on 2008-04-27 08:20:51
Well, there's way too damn much to fill you in on. Find yourself a crazy chick without STDs who wants you to choke her out while you're going at it, ignore all thoughts that go like "I shouldn't do this", stop trying to suppress your instincts trying to go against nature, and then read what you just wrote and tell us you still agree. You're not going to.

Hmmm....  I agree 1000%  I remember back when I was 16, pretending I hated sex and citing "STDs, VD, feces covered penis, OH MY!" just so I wouldn't seem like a loser to my friends.  Then I finally got laid and realized what a fool I had been.

In all seriousness Dias Flac, don't worry, eventually a girl (or guy) will like you enough to engage in "love making" and you'll have this warm tingly feeling in your pants that tells you to go ahead and grow up a little bit.   Also, please watch the 40 Year Old Virgin.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Otokoshi on 2008-04-27 20:11:24
Quote from: Dias Flac
I'm a pantheist, not an atheist. (there is a difference)

That's very true.  Atheism is the void of any god, while pantheism encompasses the universe/nature into one... well you don't believe in deities so whatever the hell you wanna call it.  So why get so upset about something as natural as having sex?  I can understand if one has personal disgust towards certain sexual practices, whether it's multiple partners or something way out there, because it's your prerogative. 

Quote from: Dias Flac
Uugh..  I've had enough of this.  Maybe I'm becoming so powerful that I'm taking a whole new route in evolution!!!!!!!!!
whoooooooohoooooooo!!!!!!

That doesn't mean you can preach against it as a pious "evolved" individual.  You seem to take the worst case scenario for every situation.  Even with one partner and using a condom, "the condom can break", come on.  It has never been safer to have sex, it's not always practiced, but that is your responsibility.

Quote from: Dias Flac
Of course women have these sexual fantasies because their men or partners have already presented them with sex, so they are bound to end up thinking about doing more explicit things in sex.  They are trained by their partners to want more and more sex.  And there is always the possibility of their partner having sex with someone else, think of what that could lead to: STD's, rape, and possibly death!  Maybe men should actually try and do what I had said to do to make love, who knows it might be much more romantic and passionate, and you might learn something about your partner, rather than having your woman get penetrated by two different guys.

Trained by their partners to want more sex?  Don't you think the desire for sex is natural?  I figured if anyone understood this, it would be a pantheist like yourself.

Quote from: Dias Flac
and all these different sexual positions, like anal sex!!!!!  Seriously, do you really want faeces on your penis???

Variety is the spice of life my friend.  Sex is great, so why not switch things up and possibly, OH NOES!! try other positions?  Or I guess we could keep our flannel pajamas on, lights off, eyes closed, completely silent, and exposing our "sin parts" through our pajama's front button.  How do expect to show this "romance" you speak of without some expression or variety?  You're lady/man is gonna get bored eventually.

Quote from: Dias Flac
The perfect age of consent should really be somewhere in between 25 - 30.

Yes, this makes perfect sense.  Cutting the average woman's fertility window by 50% makes perfect sense.  Considering any pregnancy with the mother 35 years or over is categorized as high risk.  We can have record stillborns because your not comfortable yet with having sex, brilliant!

Quote from: Dias Flac
And my point is that MODERN sex is stupid.  Sex wouldn't have gotten to where its at now if so many people hadn't taken it the wrong way.

So how far are we going back?  Because sex was never civilized.  The idea of monogamy between humans only came about through sexual dimorphism.
Even today a husband and wife stay together to care for their young offspring.  A man is looked down upon for leaving the mother and little child out in the cold.  Love follows because your always with that person, and being nice just makes it easier on you.  :-P j/k

Quote from: Dias Flac
Oh yeah.  By the way.  I was just comparing my morals to some religious people I know or know of, not to every single person on the planet.  I'm obviously much cooler than Osama bin Laden or Saddam Huessen.  They can't even make their God appear to make them Final Fantasy VII mods!  hahahahaaa!!   
  Sorry if I offended anyone!!!!!!!!!!!

It's hard to offend when most of your drivel doesn't make sense.  Which is why I think this could be a troll under our little bridge.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: gjoerulv on 2008-04-27 20:14:34
'cause there is only one truth. Your own. Amen lol!

Philosophy…but untrue. There is but one ultimate truth, however, this ultimate truth may not be in the mind of some as they may be ignorant to it. Most can only believe what they believe to be true but odds are, they don't know the ultimate truth. Odds are, no human know and never will know. Human existence will end before that time comes. Humans only have approximately 126,000 years before their next known evolutionary accent.

No, no you misunderstood. I wasn't talking 'bout the truth but the "truth" everyone individually evolves. No matter how open minded you are, you will have your own opinions on things that are dead set.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-05-09 23:22:48
Omg guys I just wanted to know the reasons of your rl believes not how you please some chicks......
But okay, if you ask for it then look at this:
Quote
Yes I am 17, seriously, no joke, not even kidding, why would I lie about such a trivial thing???  I see what your trying to do El Ammo (let me reassure you that I'm not trying to be condescending about this) your trying to present me with random information to keep me from proving a point.  And my point is that MODERN sex is stupid.  Sex wouldn't have gotten to where its at now if so many people hadn't taken it the wrong way. 

Now, please people take your time to think about things in life and dont just argue after one second of thinking. Who are you to tell mankind whats wrong or right? Who said that its not our only destiny to have sex and multiply? How we do this is up to us. You cant just decide what humans do wrong or right. RIGHT opinions about anything in life are just illusions created by human brain: I mean if one didnt know ANYTHING about the laws of todays society one could never tell if a murder is something wrong or right. Justice does not exist. It's just a thing humans driven by their thirst for power(which developed out of their hunting/surviving instinct in the humans early days) created to control others(if you do not obey, youre going to jail). No one can tell if something is wrong or right..

..and this is the reason why I dont believe in god. If theres no justice from the origin of the universe on, then there can be no justice for god. I mean whats right for god? and whats considered as a sin? We cant know so we cant know how to ascend to heaven. Theres absolutely nothing that contradicts against this for example: Fight, and the last survivor may enter heavens paradise. Who tells us that this is not what god wants? The Church? hahaha! How should they know? They cant either....so please just write something about your believes and do not criticize others.

And El Ammo Bandito:
I dont give a shit on how long youve been here. If you have a problem with non-existing paragraphs then thats your eyes problem and not ours, just skip that post. Do you really think anyone of us will react diffenrent if you right something like: "Change this and that numbskull!"? I wouldnt care a penis about that^^
Stay kind and ask friendly. If that doesnt work, then warn the person. If nothing changes, report it to qhimm and have him/her banned.
(I can understand if you are like this in rl however. I also made good experiences with being dark and scary^^However this is not the treatment one should recieve in a Final Fantasy forum. We all play the games, love the games so we all have something to share. :wink:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-05-10 02:55:36
And El Ammo Bandito:
I dont give a sh*t on how long youve been here. If you have a problem with non-existing paragraphs then thats your eyes problem and not ours, just skip that post. Do you really think anyone of us will react diffenrent if you right something like: "Change this and that numbskull!"? I wouldnt care a penis about that^^
Stay kind and ask friendly. If that doesnt work, then warn the person. If nothing changes, report it to qhimm and have him/her banned.
(I can understand if you are like this in rl however. I also made good experiences with being dark and scary^^However this is not the treatment one should recieve in a Final Fantasy forum. We all play the games, love the games so we all have something to share. :wink:

Oooh, I am a n00bfag, hear me roar.

Seriously... oh, fuck it. You obviously have it all figured out in your little head, who am I to rain on your parade?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Tsetra on 2008-05-10 03:51:43
Hooray! The sequel!
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-05-10 06:29:50
We should probably refrain from continuing an already dead conversation between me and El Ammo and get back to the topic at hand which involves what The Black Caped Man believes in.

And El Ammo at least TRY to refrain from the whole namecalling thing cuz we're not 12 anymore right? hopefully not, i'm not talking about the last comment you just made since it was Black Caped Man who stimulated a response but it still could have been handled much more appropriately
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Otokoshi on 2008-05-10 06:42:31
Quote from: The Blacked-caped Man
Now, please people take your time to think about things in life and dont just argue after one second of thinking. Who are you to tell mankind whats wrong or right? Who said that its not our only destiny to have sex and multiply? How we do this is up to us. You cant just decide what humans do wrong or right. RIGHT opinions about anything in life are just illusions created by human brain: I mean if one didnt know ANYTHING about the laws of todays society one could never tell if a murder is something wrong or right. Justice does not exist. It's just a thing humans driven by their thirst for power(which developed out of their hunting/surviving instinct in the humans early days) created to control others(if you do not obey, youre going to jail). No one can tell if something is wrong or right..

..and this is the reason why I dont believe in god. If theres no justice from the origin of the universe on, then there can be no justice for god. I mean whats right for god? and whats considered as a sin? We cant know so we cant know how to ascend to heaven. Theres absolutely nothing that contradicts against this for example: Fight, and the last survivor may enter heavens paradise. Who tells us that this is not what god wants? The Church? hahaha! How should they know? They cant either....so please just write something about your believes and do not criticize others.

And El Ammo Bandito:
I dont give a sh*t on how long youve been here. If you have a problem with non-existing paragraphs then thats your eyes problem and not ours, just skip that post. Do you really think anyone of us will react diffenrent if you right something like: "Change this and that numbskull!"? I wouldnt care a penis about that^^
Stay kind and ask friendly. If that doesnt work, then warn the person. If nothing changes, report it to qhimm and have him/her banned.
(I can understand if you are like this in rl however. I also made good experiences with being dark and scary^^However this is not the treatment one should recieve in a Final Fantasy forum. We all play the games, love the games so we all have something to share.

Wow, so you spend the majority of your post stating how in "societies rules" we don't know what is wrong or right.  All "El Ammo" does is point out rules that are being broken, that are clearly stated on these forums, and you chastise him for that?  Why, because he's mean?  Cry me a river.

Quote from: El Ammo Bandito!
You obviously have it all figured out in your little head, who am I to rain on your parade?

Apparently he does, and I want whatever he's smoking so I may contradict myself so flagrantly.

Quote from: Xelane
And El Ammo at least TRY to refrain from the whole namecalling thing cuz we're not 12 anymore right? hopefully not, i'm not talking about the last comment you just made since it was Black Caped Man who stimulated a response but it still could have been handled much more appropriately

Of course the first one to pass judgment is the infamous necroposter (http://forums.qhimm.com/index.php?topic=99.msg91472#msg91472).  Are you serious?  Who gives a fuck if someone is "mean" or not.  At least someone can follow simple rules of a forum.  Attitude is nothing that is judged on these forums, so who are you to judge him?

And people ask why I'm not around much anymore?   :roll:
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-05-10 10:03:20
Quote
Wow, so you spend the majority of your post stating how in "societies rules" we don't know what is wrong or right.  All "El Ammo" does is point out rules that are being broken, that are clearly stated on these forums, and you chastise him for that?  Why, because he's mean?  Cry me a river.
It's not that he reacts, it's the way how he reacts. If he believes that being rude is something good then I dont mind.....

And this is the reason why I didn't want anyone to criticize others: If El Ammo Bandito is mean, then just let him, think your own thoughts about him and let him be. If you criticize his lifestyle it will all end in a conversation about how one can please a girl :-D

I tell you what: Write about your belief, why it is your belief and how you came to that conclusion. STOP criticizing anything please!

Quote
Now, please people take your time to think about things in life and dont just argue after one second of thinking. Who are you to tell mankind whats wrong or right? Who said that its not our only destiny to have sex and multiply? How we do this is up to us. You cant just decide what humans do wrong or right. RIGHT opinions about anything in life are just illusions created by human brain: I mean if one didnt know ANYTHING about the laws of todays society one could never tell if a murder is something wrong or right. Justice does not exist. It's just a thing humans driven by their thirst for power(which developed out of their hunting/surviving instinct in the humans early days) created to control others(if you do not obey, youre going to jail). No one can tell if something is wrong or right..

Yeah Im quoting myself now: What no one seems to notice is that I also can't tell you if anything is wrong or right so my whole post can't be believed by you. I just wrote my opinion towards real life believes in hope that anyone would figure out that I can't know either so I would write: And this is why I didn't want anyone to criticize others: Yeah, I don't believe that anyone can tell if somethings wrong or right but that doens't mean I dont want to hear your opinions. Im just intrested in the believes of Final Fantasy players but its sad to see that some of you change this thread into completely unrelated girl f***in things........(THIS IS NO OFFENSE!)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-05-10 10:26:19
Im just intrested in the believes of...

Beliefs!!!!
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-05-10 10:58:27
Quote
Beliefs!!!!

hehe thx for the reminder :wink: (Have you noticed I also wrong-named the whole thread too?^^)

Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-05-10 11:04:00
Yeh I know, I have been reading this thread for a while now and every time I do I scream BELIEFS in my head every time. Haha
:-)
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-05-10 11:09:28
I know what youre talking about :-) I am the same when smsing with my friends....I hate misspellings...
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-05-10 18:45:16
Good job with the whole "necroposter" thing, seriously that was sad. And more to the point what "rule" was El Ammo pointing out? Because as i remember it he started everything by critisizing how i made my paragraphs way back on the 3rd page or something.

Also I care if somebody is mean and so do millions of other people. you think nobody would say anything if we were all in a room saying this rather than doing it via internet forums?
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Jari on 2008-05-10 19:27:42
Good job with the whole "necroposter" thing, seriously that was sad. And more to the point what "rule" was El Ammo pointing out? Because as i remember it he started everything by critisizing how i made my paragraphs way back on the 3rd page or something.

The one about grammar (http://forums.qhimm.com/index.php?topic=5834.0)? Maybe? I dunno, I just wrote them.


Also I care if somebody is mean and so do millions of other people. you think nobody would say anything if we were all in a room saying this rather than doing it via internet forums?

I think they would have thrown you out of the said room long time ago, for being a whinyass bitch.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: Xelane on 2008-05-10 20:38:51
Yes I was reffering to the conversation started by my lack of grammer a few weeks ago.

I'm surprised you decided to take another swing at me like that, you must really enjoy argueing to start up again after we ended the conversation a long time ago.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-05-10 21:38:08
Quote
I think they would have thrown you out of the said room long time ago, for being a whinyass b*tch.

Ok El Ammo Bandito now stop your offences. We are in a Final Fantasy forum not in some pub. The whole thing is now past and settled so lets talk about the thread topic again pls
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: *:.Griever.:* on 2008-05-10 22:04:37
Why doesn't a mod just close this thread?  It's main topic has already been discussed, therefor it's need to be open is nullified.
Title: Re: Real Life believes
Post by: The Black-caped Man on 2008-05-10 22:27:22
Guess youre right....a few people here use final fantasy forums to critizice others lifestyle.....well...it all ends here and now