Qhimm.com Forums

Miscellaneous Forums => General Discussion => Topic started by: Om on 2009-02-15 06:34:58

Title: Preferred versions of FF(and others)....which do you play?
Post by: Om on 2009-02-15 06:34:58
Hi guys.  I just want the best gaming experience possible for myself from these titles listed here. So what I'd like to know IS..... either the versions YOU prefer to play or the BEST ones in general. Just need a pro opinion.  :wink:

Note: Im not a fan of handhelds, typically. So they're kinda exempt from consideration for me. (PSP is maybe an exception because I've seen it can be hooked up to computer monitor.)  :|





These are  the main ones I'd like to inquire about. All the other FF's up are pretty much one platform, one option, AFAIK.

THANKS!




Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: dziugo on 2009-02-15 11:04:27
  • Final Fantasy VII - I have both the PSX and PC versions. And I dont need two. I've played the PSX version exclusively, only because I never had that great of a computer to run the PC version, and still don't have even basic enough of a video card to run it right. The PC version I got as a gift and just kept around despite my not being able to play it. BUT, I do plan on getting a better computer with adequate capabilities very soon. So....I'm leaning towards the PC now and thinking about letting the PSX one go. I'm certain people on this forum would be biased towards the PC version  :wink: but....what do you think? 
So, you're saying that you have a CPU slower than a 200MHz and no graphics accelerator at all? I remember that it played just fine on a Celeron 333MHz with a S3 accelerator (and the accelerator wasn't actually needed, with 333MHz you could play in software rendering mode).

And by graphics accelerator I mean ANY graphics accelerator (starting from an old 3dfx Voodoo).
Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: yoshi314 on 2009-02-15 16:17:17
Quote
And by graphics accelerator I mean ANY graphics accelerator (starting from an old 3dfx Voodoo).
yup, i played it on 120mhz pentium with 3dfx (i think it was voodoo rush card) first time around.

Quote
Final Fantasy VIII - Never really been crazy about this one. Actually I dont think I've ever played it all the way through. But why not......PSX or PC?
i think psx would be more safe choice. even though the pc version looks a bit better, you won't have issues with incompatible gfx card or something like that ;-)
Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: Om on 2009-02-15 20:09:53
So, you're saying that you have a CPU slower than a 200MHz and no graphics accelerator at all? I remember that it played just fine on a Celeron 333MHz with a S3 accelerator (and the accelerator wasn't actually needed, with 333MHz you could play in software rendering mode).

And by graphics accelerator I mean ANY graphics accelerator (starting from an old 3dfx Voodoo).

 2.8 Ghz.....Pentium 4....it's an older computer, but that should be more than good enough, right? I think it just never came with anything that could handle the graphics. It was a cheap deal at the time, put together by dell. I was never a big computer gamer, still not really now.

anyways.... on this same computer, the one I'm on atm, I had tried to run an FFVII demo years ago,just to see. It crashed seconds into the demo every time I'd start it up. So I have a crappy video card I guess.

i think psx would be more safe choice. even though the pc version looks a bit better, you won't have issues with incompatible gfx card or something like that ;-)

Very well. :thumbsup:

Thanks.  :-D
Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: Marc on 2009-02-16 02:22:46
Even integrated GPU have no problem running the game in hardware mode.  Much less so in software mode.

It's usually a driver issue if the game doesn't work.

I suggest you try it on your current PC if you have the PC version.
Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: Prince Lex on 2009-02-16 05:47:02
If I were you, and I owned FFVI, I would play it on my comp using the translated ROM and SNES emulator.
Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: Om on 2009-02-16 08:37:32
I read the emulator can make it look better than on the console, is this true? I have no experience with ROMs or emus.

How about stuff like Earthbound, Chrono Trigger, and Secret of Mana, are the roms better VS the org. cart ?

Now if I'm just playing ROMs though, what's the point of keeping the games?  :| 
Edit - Is it issues of legality?
Title: Re: Preferred versions of FF(and others)....which do you play?
Post by: Jamers on 2009-02-24 05:50:18
FF4, 5, 6 - Playstation versions. The load times can be annoying, but the extras are worth it. One exception is that I play the translated FF6 Japanese ROM also.
FF7 - PC. I mean, look at all the cool stuff we can do with it!
Title: Re: Different versions of FF(and CT)....which ones to go for? Need your input.
Post by: Prince Lex on 2009-03-11 16:52:36
I read the emulator can make it look better than on the console, is this true? I have no experience with ROMs or emus.

How about stuff like Earthbound, Chrono Trigger, and Secret of Mana, are the roms better VS the org. cart ?

Now if I'm just playing ROMs though, what's the point of keeping the games?  :| 
Edit - Is it issues of legality?


If you own the original game, legality shouldn't be an issue, however I find that playing with emulators is far more enjoyable. I played chrono trigger with an emulator.
Title: Re: Preferred versions of FF(and others)....which do you play?
Post by: hotdog963al on 2009-03-11 19:01:20
I & II = GBA
III = DS
IV, V, VI = SNES
VII = PSX (Original and Best)
VIII = PSX (^)

Personally, I prefer the original versions of the game except for the NES ones as I find the re-makes more accessible.
Title: Re: Preferred versions of FF(and others)....which do you play?
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2009-03-11 19:28:49
I think the NES ones are more difficult top get into. Although I'm usually the first one to say that bad graphics don't make a game bad, there's a limit, especially when it comes with bad sound as well.

The PSX versions of FF and FFII look and sound a lot like SNES games (I'm not sure what the other remakes of those two are like) and the DS version of FFIII looks and sounds great (I'm playing it at the moment).

I've also heard that the NES games are much harder and require more grinding; I'm sceptical about this, but if it's true it's something to bear in mind.