1
General Discussion / ePSXE?
« on: 2005-07-06 06:36:26 »
I wouldn't believe anyone would pirate one of the PS1 FF's these days. You can get them for what, $5 on ebay or in the bargain bin at your ebgames/gamestop?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
That didnt do crap, which was why i posted in this thread.
But the issue is now semi resolved: My main system now lets ff7 work *rolls eyes*
That didnt do crap, which was why i posted in this thread.
But the issue is now semi resolved: My main system now lets ff7 work *rolls eyes*
Okay, i built myself a low-end rig to run win98, and this way play older games without problems (like ff7). I've gotten AA sorta working on a geforce 4 mx440, but i get those damned gridlines, no matter what i do or what drivers i download. The card's not even mine (anymore), so i can't spend too much effort getting that particulair card working. The default card is some geforce2 mx200. I swapped cards to see what the problem was, but the 440 doesn't work much better than the 200.
Rivatuner says it doesnt support ANY of the drivers i'm Dling either, whether they be 5x.xx, 6x.xx, whatever.
Fun fact: Under winxp, the very same card worked perfetly, didn't even need rivatuner >=.
I'd rather not install winxp on this rig (I'll do a dual-boot as a last effin resort). Suggestions?
For the reccord, my main rig with a geforce 6600gt hates ff7 with a passion, so i can't go back to using that =(
Just let this thread die, okay?
And of all things, you actually think he referred to the pirates suing us? Geesh, talk about trying to find something to rant about...
And sell it widely on the black market?! Sure! Then, someone gets ahold of a copy and bitches about it not working. Then, they start complaining to us (instead of Eidos, for legal reasons) about the game not working, and then we get stuck in the middle of a gigantic class action suit. Is that what you want? Is that it?
Would using AA or AF reduce the background jaggies? that's the only thing i'm not liking atm.
I mean no offence to anyone here if they do, But you have to be a sad bastard to read the EULA whenever you install a game....I mean...You buy halo for the PC the day it comes out, you pop the dvd in the drive and bam...You are compulsed to read a 56 page essay about what you are allowed to do with the copy you just forked out 40 quid for. You're not going to read it. You're just goping to click ok and get installing!
I have finished and released the patch! You can download it from my website in the hacks section. The patch cannot be redistributed without my permission.
Enjoy!
Ah yes, the gray area of no-CD cracks... What's the current legal status of them again?
Quote from: Trek234<sigh> I never said 60hz didn't cause head aches.
The fact is though when you are locked at 60hz you are also locked at 60fps. I.e. motorcycle goes at 60fps instead of 200fps.
Uhm... no it doesn't. Setting/locking the screen refresh rate doesn't affect the actual FPS of the game, unless it's a REALLY simple engine which always waits for vsyncs (which I don't believe FF7's does). If in doubt, consider Quake III running at 140fps. That doesn't mean 140 frames are pushed to the screen every second, merely to the graphics memory. Besides, locking DirectX's framerate is quite a ...uhm, crude way to fix a single game. No offsense.
50 Hz visibly flickers, while 60 Hz merely proves to be annoying as it becomes a strain on your eyes and is a never-ending source of head-aches.
Wouldn't that just make the screen flicker instead of being smooth?