Author Topic: If your gonna delete my post atleast message me to explain why??  (Read 2570 times)

peroxwhygenesis

  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Hi guys, could someone help clear something up for me.
I have all the up to date current mods installed for FF7 with no problems and they work great.

I wanted to start playing FF8 again so I began looking for graphic improvement mods.
I first installed ff8 launcher 1.31 which drastically improved the games graphics with the exception of a black boader around trees and mountains in most fighting environments.

I then read that the launcher was old an doutdated and the same alias driver I use for FF7 can be used to improve FF8.
I installed the driver the same way (copy and paste into game directory) and set the resolution to 1600x900. However the graphics look very blocky incomparison to the launcher.

Am I doing something wrong? Or is the launcher the way to go? I notice there is a config file for FF7 and not FF8 when installing the driver. Do I just copy  the driver files into the directory and launch with no need for any special config file?
As Alias driver is meant to be modern I expected even better graphics than the launcher not worse. Any help or info would be greatly appreciated.

Windows 7 64 bit
4Gig ram
ATI Radeon Mobility 4650
Core i7 1.6gig

Covarr

  • Covarr-Let
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 3940
  • Just Covarr. No "n".
    • View Profile
I deleted your post because you already posted it in this thread (twice, even). It only needs to be in one place, and that seemed more appropriate since it is about Aali's driver.

obesebear

  • *
  • Posts: 1389
    • View Profile
actually I merged his post into aali's thread.  Why?  Well, because logic.  It's called the Driver Help Thread for christ sakes.  Same thing is happening to random bootleg help threads and other threads in general that have no business having their own individual topic.


Hopefully after all the cleaning up is done it'll be a lot easier for people to figure out that their question probably isn't the first of its kind.