Qhimm.com Forums

Off-topic forums => Completely Unrelated => Topic started by: Jari on 2010-01-09 03:41:42

Title: Sex offender shuffle
Post by: Jari on 2010-01-09 03:41:42

Teh win (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfCYZ3pks48). :-D

Title: Re: Sex offender shuffle
Post by: sl1982 on 2010-01-09 03:58:33

Hah, was that real? If so then even funnier

Title: Re: Sex offender shuffle
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2010-01-09 21:19:52

 :lol:

So, is it only sex offenders whose identity gets revealed to their neighbours? I wonder whether US lawmakers think that it's more important for people to know about 19-year-olds who have sex with their 17-year-old girlfriends or basement dwellers who are caught with lolicon manga than about murderers who might be living amongst them.

(on a related note, I often think that the Anglo-Saxon countries are having a competition to see who can be the most hysterical about paedophilia. If so, Canada is winning (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/12/07/canada-bans-talking-to-children-online/) after overtaking Britain :-D)

Title: Re: Sex offender shuffle
Post by: The Seer of Shadows on 2010-01-10 07:53:04

Quote from: sl1982 on 2010-01-09 03:58:33

Hah, was that real? If so then even funnier

Definitely wasn't real, but still hilarious :lol:

Title: Re: Sex offender shuffle
Post by: Marc on 2010-01-11 21:34:45

Quote from: Kudistos Megistos on 2010-01-09 21:19:52

:lol:

So, is it only sex offenders whose identity gets revealed to their neighbours? I wonder whether US lawmakers think that it's more important for people to know about 19-year-olds who have sex with their 17-year-old girlfriends or basement dwellers who are caught with lolicon manga than about murderers who might be living amongst them.

(on a related note, I often think that the Anglo-Saxon countries are having a competition to see who can be the most hysterical about paedophilia. If so, Canada is winning (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/12/07/canada-bans-talking-to-children-online/) after overtaking Britain :-D)

Once you read the actual article, it actually makes sense.  No cybersex with 12 years old.  Of course, it leaves room for interpretation and therein lies the problem ...

Title: Re: Sex offender shuffle
Post by: Kudistos Megistos on 2010-01-12 05:04:56

Hey, I read that article :cry:

And the room for interpretation does mean that, for people who fit society's idea of a sex criminal (i.e. ugly, socially awkward and lacking charisma), there is a very real possibility of some legal action being taken for as little as talking to a child online.