Author Topic: Sex offender shuffle  (Read 4539 times)

Jari

  • Guest
Sex offender shuffle
« on: 2010-01-09 03:41:42 »

sl1982

  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 3764
  • GUI Master :P
    • View Profile
Re: Sex offender shuffle
« Reply #1 on: 2010-01-09 03:58:33 »
Hah, was that real? If so then even funnier

Kudistos Megistos

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 3929
    • View Profile
Re: Sex offender shuffle
« Reply #2 on: 2010-01-09 21:19:52 »
 :lol:

So, is it only sex offenders whose identity gets revealed to their neighbours? I wonder whether US lawmakers think that it's more important for people to know about 19-year-olds who have sex with their 17-year-old girlfriends or basement dwellers who are caught with lolicon manga than about murderers who might be living amongst them.

(on a related note, I often think that the Anglo-Saxon countries are having a competition to see who can be the most hysterical about paedophilia. If so, Canada is winning after overtaking Britain :-D)
« Last Edit: 2010-01-09 21:23:22 by Kudistos Megistos »

The Seer of Shadows

  • *
  • Posts: 1140
  • I used to be indecisive. But now, I'm not sure...
    • View Profile
Re: Sex offender shuffle
« Reply #3 on: 2010-01-10 07:53:04 »
Hah, was that real? If so then even funnier

Definitely wasn't real, but still hilarious :lol:

Marc

  • *
  • Posts: 445
  • I hear Voices ... in my head
    • View Profile
Re: Sex offender shuffle
« Reply #4 on: 2010-01-11 21:34:45 »
:lol:

So, is it only sex offenders whose identity gets revealed to their neighbours? I wonder whether US lawmakers think that it's more important for people to know about 19-year-olds who have sex with their 17-year-old girlfriends or basement dwellers who are caught with lolicon manga than about murderers who might be living amongst them.

(on a related note, I often think that the Anglo-Saxon countries are having a competition to see who can be the most hysterical about paedophilia. If so, Canada is winning after overtaking Britain :-D)

Once you read the actual article, it actually makes sense.  No cybersex with 12 years old.  Of course, it leaves room for interpretation and therein lies the problem ...

Kudistos Megistos

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 3929
    • View Profile
Re: Sex offender shuffle
« Reply #5 on: 2010-01-12 05:04:56 »
Hey, I read that article :cry:

And the room for interpretation does mean that, for people who fit society's idea of a sex criminal (i.e. ugly, socially awkward and lacking charisma), there is a very real possibility of some legal action being taken for as little as talking to a child online.