My true colors indeed. I'm best friends with DLPB. Best friends since way, way back. We're going to take over these forums he and I, just biding our time for now. In all honesty, I'm best friends with whoever I side with in any debate... it's just the sad truth of things. How could I possibly be neutral on a Final Fantasy forum... emotions just run too high.
And the worst thing about that is that your sarcasm is so close to the truth. There's clear favouritism; you've even
admitted to it.
What else is clear is that I am being used as a proxy by which to attack Jari. All of Seifer's arguments lump me and Jari together*, and your claims that I have some grudge against Seifer show that you have confused
my history with Seifer with
Jari's history with Seifer, and have made assumptions about my motivations based on that confusion.
However, I think you do realize your bias and just want an argument.
You keep saying that. You have no evidence, but you keep saying it. Is it so hard to believe that I thought Seifer's argument was just
bad?
*What's especially funny about Seifer's conspiracy theory that I am secretly working with Jari just to be mean with him is that I could just as easily make the same claim about Seifer, and I'd have more evidence! I could say that Seifer is working with Hermoor to be mean to me. Those two have been known to work together in the past in order to cause trouble, and Seifer is generally known to play the PM game to get people on his side. I have never done that. He had no evidence that I was doing that; he just asserted it. Just as you have asserted that I am trolling, without having any evidence.
I'd really like to see some evidence for these claims that all I'm doing is trolling, because at the moment, there is none. There are just assertions. Assertions that are made with no evidence and assertions that are based upon outright falsehoods.
What's also interesting is that no-one has made much of an argument for anything I've said being false. People just seem content to say that I'm trolling and ignore the truth completely. That's a classic Bulverism. Don't bother to say what's wrong with someone's argument (that's too hard!), just assume that the person is wrong and come up with reasons as to why the person came to be so silly.
You missed the whole earlier part of the joke (deliberately?) see you have a very interesting post style. Many people found my joke funny and it could have ended the situation had you not kept pressing the issue.
Then you should take more care to make your jokes clearer and to make sure that they're appropriate for the situation.
If no harm was intended, then I am of course willing to let it go.