Qhimm:
Not that I wish to in any way downplay the events that occured, but using wild exaggurations won't help anyone. The death count is estimated to be in the range of a couple of thousands, but nobody knows. It's definitely not half a million, though.
I agree. However, there *could* still have been a lot of people who vaporized. As many as 10,000 different people in each of the Towers, plus people on the ground and in adjacent buildings. I also remember hearing that two more NY buildings have since also fallen. Last night they said there were about 300 Fireman and Police who were on the scene when the first tower collapsed and are believed dead. There's something like 200+ confirmed dead at the Pentagon, and the total number for the dead passengers of the 4 hijacked planes seem to be hovering in the high 260s. Last I heard about New York, a top goverment official was quoted as "hoping" that an estimate of 800 dead from the Towers was unrealistically high.
What's more creepy though... have anyone noticed how shook-up president Bush looks? ...exactly.
I get the impression that he's angry, and, instead of exploding, he's putting his anger to constructive purposes.
how can anyone harbor so little respect for human life?
Check out the stuff their kids are learning in school sometime. All kinds of stuff that absolutely brainwashes their kids with Muslim extremism against Israel and the rest of the West. Frightfully violent anti-West and anti-Israel stuff. Even children's songs have been rewritten.
Jari Huttunen:
You are seeing the reason right now; massive publicity. Even bad publicity is publicity, after all. Although usually you are supposed to take the responsibility to get the PR, which hasn't happened, at least yet.
In addition, if the perpetrators *are*, in fact, extremist Muslim terrorists, than it's also a matter of their Jihad/"holy" war against us. We are merely "infidels", of whom it is an "honor" to kill.
Or it just might be that someone is really pissed at US, and 'cause you can't really threaten a superpower via conventional war you have to apply poor man's warfare: terrorism.
I think there's some truth to that. Why else hasn't whoever it is that did it claimed responsibility? The intent of terrorism is to sow terror, after all.
dagsverre:
Oh, and this time it doesn't look like it's done for publicity, but rather for pissing off US...these people want to have the Islam world at war with the western one.
I agree. Really hard to negotiate with people who don't want to negotiate...
darkness:
A terrorist group admitted to it. But then the leader said 'No we didn't. Thats terrible!' or something along those lines.
IIRC, that's the warning Jari was referring to. The reporter who got it didn't bother to report it until after what happened yesterday. Osama bin Laden and the Taliban leader (ruler of Afghanistan in everything but name) have both denied involvement. However, I guess there's several US intelligence reports (intercepted transmissions) that indicate otherwise.
StrayWings:
11 = 11TH September, Tuesday
9+3 = 12TH September, Wednesday
1+7+5 = 13TH September, Thrusday
7+7 = 14TH September, Friday
If you want my personal opinion, that's just superstition.

I think it was symbolism enough that the planes hijacked were from "American Airlines" and "U.S. Continental" or something like that.
This person predicted World War 1 as well as World War 2...and his predictions were correct on both events, and he has made quite some more predictions, but not all of them came true..let's just hope that this one is one of them..
I agree with Ficedula. I'd bet a lot that those "predictions" were just as intentionally vague as the one you just listed.

If a prophecy is not specific, or if the prophet is wrong even once, I find it very hard to respect or believe it/them.
eerrrr:
The USA teamed up with UK, France...cant remember.
From what I hear it's every member of NATO. "...an attack on one member is an attack on all members..." etc. etc.
ficedula:
Remember Vietnam? All the resources of the USA - and other countries - couldn't win there, because it wasn't a simple battle, army vs. army.
Actually, IIRC, it wasn't the whole US army. (I'm pretty sure at it wasn't ever much more than 700,000 marines.) The main reason we pulled out was because the majority of the American public (this was the 70s, after all

) didn't even want to be involved in the war, and that naturally made our leaders rather unpopular. Eventually, to try to salvage things they pulled out. But I agree, it wasn't a normal war. It was all jungle, guerilla tactics, and so forth.
vvalentine:
This is freaky.
Well, if you *really* want some very specific prophecies that came true centuries after they were made, check out the Bible sometime.
SLG:
I am an emotionless being.
Unless you are not a human, I find that hard to believe. Humans are emotional beings. Therefore, everyone has emotions. For instance, your very handle is "Some-Loser-Girl". From that it is very easy to infer that you have a low opinion of yourself, and that is therefore why you chose your handle. That may not be the case, only you know the truth, but one's self esteem is rather directly linked with emotions. Perhaps your handle has some other meaning, such as a humourous intent, but that too is directly linked with emotion. Spock didn't go around calling himself "Some-Loser-Guy".
More examples from stuff you've posted (I hope I'm not compromising Remake security here

):
One thing I feared
Bah. Now everything is not aligned.
My homosexual e-mail will not allow me to download the file.
Is this a personal attack? Of course not. If it hurts your feelings, I apologize. Of course, if you really don't have any feelings (feelings=emotions), then I guess I have nothing to worry about...
Why make a big deal out of this? Well, I guess it's because I have an uncomfortable time with anyone who tries to act as if they are impervious to and without emotions. Possibly because I used to try to do that myself, trying to suppress my emotions and act as though I had none, to the point of unmoveability. I eventually realized that it was mostly a defensive tactic that came out of my very low self-esteem. In fact, I think that it was almost a subconscious attempt on my part to make up for my shortcomings by viewing myself as better than others. After all, I was not burdened by emotions, which were obviously pure folly, and, therefore, I was better than those I despised.
I'm not accusing you of having an inferority complex like I have (again, only you know the truth). You're certainly entitled to your opinion (although opinions pretty much==emotions...), and this is just my own opinion; but I *seriously* doubt that anyone human is without emotions. It's just an essential part of how we are made up.
end RANT.
Anyway, the terrorism affected me as well. I don't exactly feel much sympathy for the victims, mostly because of 2 things:
1. I have not seen any of the news footage
and
2. It just all seems rather distant and unreal to me. Maybe if I actually knew some of the people who died or if I'd ever been to New York it would be different. That's what it was like for things like the Columbine Massacre. That just hit a lot closer to home for me. Of course, it should have. Heck, I was at the same concert as the 2 killers a night or so before they went on their rampage. But somehow this just doesn't seem the same.
Anyway, things are still in a tizzy here. My state has a number of potential terrorist targets (IIRC, we house the "secret" backup US military/government HQ in addition to a trade center), and the President briefly came out to an adjacent state because they learned that the White House and Air Force 1 were targets.
All mail is frozen. The only plane is a military plane that's carrying aid supplies/workers or mail or something back and forth between here and somewhere else at all hours of the day. I couldn't connect to the 'net for a whole day, and the only news anywhere and everywhere was terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. I think people are getting tired of it.
Sooner or later, people's thoughts will probably switch from grief and shock to violence and revenge. If the government doesn't do anything, the people will (mobs/riots/witchhunts). Unless whoever did this knows something we don't, mobilizing America against them was *not* a smart idea.